Yong Chan Bae, Yong Woo Lee, Chi Hyun Lee, Hoon-Soo Kim
{"title":"Time-trend analysis of 78 orbicularis oculi myocutaneous flaps in periorbital reconstruction: a single-center retrospective study in South Korea.","authors":"Yong Chan Bae, Yong Woo Lee, Chi Hyun Lee, Hoon-Soo Kim","doi":"10.7181/acfs.2025.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The orbicularis oculi myocutaneous (OOMC) flap offers an excellent match in color, thickness, and texture for periorbital defects, yet large-scale, long-term data remain scarce. To determine whether indications, flap‑design preferences, and complication profiles change as surgical experience accumulates, cases were stratified into an early practice phase (2001-2017) and a contemporary phase following technique refinement and wider adoption (2018-2024).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All periorbital reconstructions utilizing OOMC flaps between November 2001 and December 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were stratified into Group A (2001-2017) and Group B (2018-2024). We analyzed patient age, sex, etiology, defect site/number, flap design (V-Y advancement, unipedicle/bipedicle switch, pivot), adjunctive procedures, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-eight OOMC flaps were performed in 57 patients for 70 defects. Group A included 25 patients, 30 defects, and 36 flaps, while Group B included 32 patients, 40 defects, and 42 flaps. Basal cell carcinoma was the leading etiology in both periods (77%). The proportion of V-Y advancement flaps rose from 50% (18/36) in Group A to 83% (35/42) in Group B. No flap necrosis occurred, and tumor recurrence was observed only once in Group A.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the relatively short observation window for Group B, OOMC flap use increased markedly, confirming that accumulated surgical experience promotes even more frequent application in periorbital reconstruction. The V-Y advancement variant, in particular, expanded in indication without added morbidity and appears highly reliable for a broad spectrum of periorbital defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":52238,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":"26 5","pages":"190-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12591730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2025.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The orbicularis oculi myocutaneous (OOMC) flap offers an excellent match in color, thickness, and texture for periorbital defects, yet large-scale, long-term data remain scarce. To determine whether indications, flap‑design preferences, and complication profiles change as surgical experience accumulates, cases were stratified into an early practice phase (2001-2017) and a contemporary phase following technique refinement and wider adoption (2018-2024).
Methods: All periorbital reconstructions utilizing OOMC flaps between November 2001 and December 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were stratified into Group A (2001-2017) and Group B (2018-2024). We analyzed patient age, sex, etiology, defect site/number, flap design (V-Y advancement, unipedicle/bipedicle switch, pivot), adjunctive procedures, and complications.
Results: Seventy-eight OOMC flaps were performed in 57 patients for 70 defects. Group A included 25 patients, 30 defects, and 36 flaps, while Group B included 32 patients, 40 defects, and 42 flaps. Basal cell carcinoma was the leading etiology in both periods (77%). The proportion of V-Y advancement flaps rose from 50% (18/36) in Group A to 83% (35/42) in Group B. No flap necrosis occurred, and tumor recurrence was observed only once in Group A.
Conclusion: Despite the relatively short observation window for Group B, OOMC flap use increased markedly, confirming that accumulated surgical experience promotes even more frequent application in periorbital reconstruction. The V-Y advancement variant, in particular, expanded in indication without added morbidity and appears highly reliable for a broad spectrum of periorbital defects.