Assessment of an Allergy Study Including Rapid Provocation Tests to Identify a Safe Alternative Contrast Agent and Phenotyping of Patients With a History of Hypersensitivity to Iodinated Contrast Media.
Francisco Vega, Azahara Lopez-Raigada, Marina Soria, Maria Catala, Carlos Blanco-Mota, Victoria Mugica, Carlos Blanco
{"title":"Assessment of an Allergy Study Including Rapid Provocation Tests to Identify a Safe Alternative Contrast Agent and Phenotyping of Patients With a History of Hypersensitivity to Iodinated Contrast Media.","authors":"Francisco Vega, Azahara Lopez-Raigada, Marina Soria, Maria Catala, Carlos Blanco-Mota, Victoria Mugica, Carlos Blanco","doi":"10.18176/jiaci.1091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Provocation tests with contrast media are increasingly necessary to complete an allergy work-up. However, they are not standardized. Objective: We aimed to evaluate a rapid provocation test in patients with a history of anaphylaxis. Our secondary objectives included phenotyping the study population and proposing a predictive methodology for allergy test outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an allergy study using iohexol, iodixanol, ioversol, and iobitridol in patients ≥18 years of age with previous hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media. A rapid provocation test (100 cc administered in 12 minutes) was performed using a noninvolved iodinated contrast medium that had yielded negative skin test results. The statistical analysis comprised binary logistic regression and cluster analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 patients were enrolled. Ninety-six patients (74%) developed cutaneous symptoms exclusively, while 17 patients (13%) experienced anaphylaxis. Nine patients (7%) had positive skin test results, and 20 of 141 provocation tests performed were positive. All patients developed mild cutaneous symptoms, including those with a history of anaphylaxis. A safe alternative contrast medium was recommended to 122 patients (94%), with good tolerance in 50 patients in a new radiological examination. We identified 3 patient phenotypes, each associated with a different risk of a positive drug provocation test result. A predictive model for allergy test outcomes was developed, although its statistical predictive capacity was low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We confirmed the efficacy and safety of a protocol including rapid provocation tests in patients with hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media of varying severity. Three patient clusters were identified, each showing a different risk level for a positive provocation test result.</p>","PeriodicalId":50173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"226-236"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.1091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: Provocation tests with contrast media are increasingly necessary to complete an allergy work-up. However, they are not standardized. Objective: We aimed to evaluate a rapid provocation test in patients with a history of anaphylaxis. Our secondary objectives included phenotyping the study population and proposing a predictive methodology for allergy test outcomes.
Methods: We performed an allergy study using iohexol, iodixanol, ioversol, and iobitridol in patients ≥18 years of age with previous hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media. A rapid provocation test (100 cc administered in 12 minutes) was performed using a noninvolved iodinated contrast medium that had yielded negative skin test results. The statistical analysis comprised binary logistic regression and cluster analysis.
Results: A total of 130 patients were enrolled. Ninety-six patients (74%) developed cutaneous symptoms exclusively, while 17 patients (13%) experienced anaphylaxis. Nine patients (7%) had positive skin test results, and 20 of 141 provocation tests performed were positive. All patients developed mild cutaneous symptoms, including those with a history of anaphylaxis. A safe alternative contrast medium was recommended to 122 patients (94%), with good tolerance in 50 patients in a new radiological examination. We identified 3 patient phenotypes, each associated with a different risk of a positive drug provocation test result. A predictive model for allergy test outcomes was developed, although its statistical predictive capacity was low.
Conclusions: We confirmed the efficacy and safety of a protocol including rapid provocation tests in patients with hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media of varying severity. Three patient clusters were identified, each showing a different risk level for a positive provocation test result.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology (J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol) provides an attractive and very active forum for basic and clinical research in allergology and clinical immunology.Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology publishes original works, reviews, short communications and opinions.