Assessment of an Allergy Study Including Rapid Provocation Tests to Identify a Safe Alternative Contrast Agent and Phenotyping of Patients With a History of Hypersensitivity to Iodinated Contrast Media.

IF 6.6 3区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Francisco Vega, Azahara Lopez-Raigada, Marina Soria, Maria Catala, Carlos Blanco-Mota, Victoria Mugica, Carlos Blanco
{"title":"Assessment of an Allergy Study Including Rapid Provocation Tests to Identify a Safe Alternative Contrast Agent and Phenotyping of Patients With a History of Hypersensitivity to Iodinated Contrast Media.","authors":"Francisco Vega, Azahara Lopez-Raigada, Marina Soria, Maria Catala, Carlos Blanco-Mota, Victoria Mugica, Carlos Blanco","doi":"10.18176/jiaci.1091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Provocation tests with contrast media are increasingly necessary to complete an allergy work-up. However, they are not standardized. Objective: We aimed to evaluate a rapid provocation test in patients with a history of anaphylaxis. Our secondary objectives included phenotyping the study population and proposing a predictive methodology for allergy test outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an allergy study using iohexol, iodixanol, ioversol, and iobitridol in patients ≥18 years of age with previous hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media. A rapid provocation test (100 cc administered in 12 minutes) was performed using a noninvolved iodinated contrast medium that had yielded negative skin test results. The statistical analysis comprised binary logistic regression and cluster analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 patients were enrolled. Ninety-six patients (74%) developed cutaneous symptoms exclusively, while 17 patients (13%) experienced anaphylaxis. Nine patients (7%) had positive skin test results, and 20 of 141 provocation tests performed were positive. All patients developed mild cutaneous symptoms, including those with a history of anaphylaxis. A safe alternative contrast medium was recommended to 122 patients (94%), with good tolerance in 50 patients in a new radiological examination. We identified 3 patient phenotypes, each associated with a different risk of a positive drug provocation test result. A predictive model for allergy test outcomes was developed, although its statistical predictive capacity was low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We confirmed the efficacy and safety of a protocol including rapid provocation tests in patients with hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media of varying severity. Three patient clusters were identified, each showing a different risk level for a positive provocation test result.</p>","PeriodicalId":50173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"226-236"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.1091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Provocation tests with contrast media are increasingly necessary to complete an allergy work-up. However, they are not standardized. Objective: We aimed to evaluate a rapid provocation test in patients with a history of anaphylaxis. Our secondary objectives included phenotyping the study population and proposing a predictive methodology for allergy test outcomes.

Methods: We performed an allergy study using iohexol, iodixanol, ioversol, and iobitridol in patients ≥18 years of age with previous hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media. A rapid provocation test (100 cc administered in 12 minutes) was performed using a noninvolved iodinated contrast medium that had yielded negative skin test results. The statistical analysis comprised binary logistic regression and cluster analysis.

Results: A total of 130 patients were enrolled. Ninety-six patients (74%) developed cutaneous symptoms exclusively, while 17 patients (13%) experienced anaphylaxis. Nine patients (7%) had positive skin test results, and 20 of 141 provocation tests performed were positive. All patients developed mild cutaneous symptoms, including those with a history of anaphylaxis. A safe alternative contrast medium was recommended to 122 patients (94%), with good tolerance in 50 patients in a new radiological examination. We identified 3 patient phenotypes, each associated with a different risk of a positive drug provocation test result. A predictive model for allergy test outcomes was developed, although its statistical predictive capacity was low.

Conclusions: We confirmed the efficacy and safety of a protocol including rapid provocation tests in patients with hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media of varying severity. Three patient clusters were identified, each showing a different risk level for a positive provocation test result.

一项过敏研究的评估,包括快速激发试验,以确定一种安全的替代造影剂和对碘造影剂过敏史的患者的表型
背景和目的:造影剂激发试验越来越有必要完成过敏检查。然而,它们并没有标准化。我们的目的是评估有过敏史的患者的快速激发试验。我们的次要目标包括对研究人群进行表型分析,并提出过敏试验结果的预测方法。方法:我们对年龄≥18岁且既往对碘造影剂有过敏反应的患者使用碘己醇、碘沙醇、碘维醇和碘比尼醇进行过敏研究。快速激发试验(在12分钟内给药100毫升)使用皮肤试验结果为阴性的非受累碘造影剂进行。统计分析包括二元逻辑回归和聚类分析。结果:共纳入130例患者。96例患者(74%)仅出现皮肤症状,17例患者(13%)出现过敏反应。9例患者(7%)皮肤试验结果阳性,141例激发试验中20例阳性。所有患者均出现轻度皮肤症状,包括有过敏史的患者。122例(94%)患者推荐了一种安全的替代造影剂,50例患者在新的放射学检查中具有良好的耐受性。我们确定了3种患者表型,每种表型都与药物激发试验阳性结果的不同风险相关。开发了过敏试验结果的预测模型,尽管其统计预测能力较低。结论:证实了一种方案的有效性和安全性,包括对不同严重程度的碘造影剂过敏反应的患者进行快速激发试验。确定了三组患者,每组患者对激发试验阳性结果显示不同的风险水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology (J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol) provides an attractive and very active forum for basic and clinical research in allergology and clinical immunology.Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology publishes original works, reviews, short communications and opinions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书