Assessing and Resolving Findings of Sex Chromosome Discordance in Genetic Testing.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Kyle T Salsbery, Anna A Essendrup, Heather C Flynn Gilmer, Molly H Nelson-Holte, Lauren A Choate, Zhiyv Niu
{"title":"Assessing and Resolving Findings of Sex Chromosome Discordance in Genetic Testing.","authors":"Kyle T Salsbery, Anna A Essendrup, Heather C Flynn Gilmer, Molly H Nelson-Holte, Lauren A Choate, Zhiyv Niu","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>X and Y chromosome analysis is a critical component of genetic testing, used both diagnostically and as a quality control (QC) metric. Discordances between expected and observed sex chromosome data can arise due to mislabeling, demographic data errors, transplant history, or biological variations. Such discordances pose challenges to laboratories and affect patient care, particularly in marginalized populations and unique clinical contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed cases of sex chromosome discordance identified at our laboratory from January 2021 through August 2023. Cases spanned various testing methods and were categorized by the root cause, including mislabeling, sample mix-ups, transgender individuals, stem cell transplants, and unexplained causes. Case outcomes were assessed, and potential resolutions were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 65 cases identified, the leading cause of discordance was mislabeling (n = 20, 31%), followed by other/not identified (n = 16, 25%), sample mix-ups (n = 13, 20%), transgender individuals (n = 9, 14%), and stem cell transplants (n = 7, 11%). Cases required additional QC processes such as reanalysis, clinician contact, and occasionally sample re-collection. The process extended turnaround times by up to 13 business days. Detailed case reviews highlighted the challenges and implications of managing these discordances, emphasizing the importance of accurate data transmission and inclusive practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using X and Y chromosome data as a QC metric can identify critical errors but also introduces limitations and bias. Improved standardization, inclusive practices, and alternative QC methods are necessary to ensure accuracy and equitable patient care. Collaborative efforts are required to address demographic complexities and reduce testing delays.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"4-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: X and Y chromosome analysis is a critical component of genetic testing, used both diagnostically and as a quality control (QC) metric. Discordances between expected and observed sex chromosome data can arise due to mislabeling, demographic data errors, transplant history, or biological variations. Such discordances pose challenges to laboratories and affect patient care, particularly in marginalized populations and unique clinical contexts.

Methods: We reviewed cases of sex chromosome discordance identified at our laboratory from January 2021 through August 2023. Cases spanned various testing methods and were categorized by the root cause, including mislabeling, sample mix-ups, transgender individuals, stem cell transplants, and unexplained causes. Case outcomes were assessed, and potential resolutions were analyzed.

Results: Among 65 cases identified, the leading cause of discordance was mislabeling (n = 20, 31%), followed by other/not identified (n = 16, 25%), sample mix-ups (n = 13, 20%), transgender individuals (n = 9, 14%), and stem cell transplants (n = 7, 11%). Cases required additional QC processes such as reanalysis, clinician contact, and occasionally sample re-collection. The process extended turnaround times by up to 13 business days. Detailed case reviews highlighted the challenges and implications of managing these discordances, emphasizing the importance of accurate data transmission and inclusive practices.

Conclusion: Using X and Y chromosome data as a QC metric can identify critical errors but also introduces limitations and bias. Improved standardization, inclusive practices, and alternative QC methods are necessary to ensure accuracy and equitable patient care. Collaborative efforts are required to address demographic complexities and reduce testing delays.

基因检测中性染色体不一致发现的评估与解决。
背景:X和Y染色体分析是基因检测的重要组成部分,既用于诊断,也用于质量控制(QC)指标。预期和观察到的性染色体数据之间的不一致可能是由于错误标记、人口统计数据错误、移植史或生物学变异引起的。这种不一致给实验室带来了挑战,并影响了患者护理,特别是在边缘化人群和独特的临床环境中。方法:我们回顾了从2021年1月到2023年8月在我们实验室发现的性染色体不一致病例。病例跨越了各种检测方法,并根据根本原因进行了分类,包括标签错误、样本混淆、变性人、干细胞移植和原因不明。评估病例结果,并分析可能的解决方案。结果:在确定的65例病例中,导致不一致的主要原因是标签错误(n = 20, 31%),其次是其他/未识别(n = 16, 25%),样本混淆(n = 13, 20%),变性人(n = 9, 14%)和干细胞移植(n = 7, 11%)。病例需要额外的质量控制过程,如再分析,临床医生联系,偶尔重新收集样本。该流程将周转时间延长了13个工作日。详细的案例审查强调了管理这些不协调的挑战和影响,强调了准确数据传输和包容性做法的重要性。结论:使用X和Y染色体数据作为质量控制指标可以识别关键误差,但也引入了局限性和偏差。改进的标准化、包容性实践和可替代的质量控制方法对于确保患者护理的准确性和公平性是必要的。需要协作努力来解决人口统计的复杂性和减少测试延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书