Errors and negative outcomes in home blood pressure monitoring by hypertensive individuals: a scoping review.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-03 DOI:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000778
Francisco M L Cavalcante, Odézio D Brito, Ana C S Estácio, Ana R S O Kumakura, Anne F L Chaves, Nelson M Galindo Neto, Lívia M Barros
{"title":"Errors and negative outcomes in home blood pressure monitoring by hypertensive individuals: a scoping review.","authors":"Francisco M L Cavalcante, Odézio D Brito, Ana C S Estácio, Ana R S O Kumakura, Anne F L Chaves, Nelson M Galindo Neto, Lívia M Barros","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is a valuable tool in the diagnosis and management of hypertension; however, patients often perform inaccurate measurements because of inadequate technique, which may lead to adverse health outcomes. This scoping review aimed to map the errors and negative outcomes associated with HBPM in individuals with hypertension. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Fifteen databases were searched from April to May 2025. The review included primary studies, literature reviews, theses, and dissertations that addressed errors and negative outcomes of HBPM. Independent researchers assessed eligibility and performed data extraction. The data were analyzed descriptively. The search yielded 18 391 studies, 14 of which met the inclusion criteria. In total, 35 distinct HBPM errors were identified. The most prevalent errors reported were failure to follow the recommended number or schedule for daily blood pressure (BP) measurements (57.14%), failure to support the back during measurement (35.71%), inadequate interval between meals or coffee consumption and BP measurement (35.71%), talking during measurement (35.71%) and failure to record the measured BP values (35.71%). The most frequently cited negative outcomes were anxiety, uncontrolled hypertension, self-medication, and an increased number of unplanned emergency room visits (40.0% each). This review highlights that many patients with hypertension perform HBPM inaccurately, committing errors that can be mitigated with professional guidance during consultations. Therefore, healthcare professionals and services must dedicate efforts to properly train and empower patients in the correct execution of this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"6-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000778","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is a valuable tool in the diagnosis and management of hypertension; however, patients often perform inaccurate measurements because of inadequate technique, which may lead to adverse health outcomes. This scoping review aimed to map the errors and negative outcomes associated with HBPM in individuals with hypertension. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Fifteen databases were searched from April to May 2025. The review included primary studies, literature reviews, theses, and dissertations that addressed errors and negative outcomes of HBPM. Independent researchers assessed eligibility and performed data extraction. The data were analyzed descriptively. The search yielded 18 391 studies, 14 of which met the inclusion criteria. In total, 35 distinct HBPM errors were identified. The most prevalent errors reported were failure to follow the recommended number or schedule for daily blood pressure (BP) measurements (57.14%), failure to support the back during measurement (35.71%), inadequate interval between meals or coffee consumption and BP measurement (35.71%), talking during measurement (35.71%) and failure to record the measured BP values (35.71%). The most frequently cited negative outcomes were anxiety, uncontrolled hypertension, self-medication, and an increased number of unplanned emergency room visits (40.0% each). This review highlights that many patients with hypertension perform HBPM inaccurately, committing errors that can be mitigated with professional guidance during consultations. Therefore, healthcare professionals and services must dedicate efforts to properly train and empower patients in the correct execution of this procedure.

高血压患者家庭血压监测中的错误和负面结果:范围综述。
家庭血压监测(HBPM)是诊断和治疗高血压的重要工具;然而,由于技术不足,患者常常进行不准确的测量,这可能导致不良的健康结果。本综述旨在绘制高血压患者HBPM相关的错误和负面结果。这个范围审查是按照乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法进行的。从2025年4月到5月检索了15个数据库。本综述包括初步研究、文献综述、论文和论文,这些都涉及到HBPM的错误和负面结果。独立研究人员评估了资格并进行了数据提取。对数据进行描述性分析。检索结果为18391项研究,其中14项符合纳入标准。总共鉴定出35种不同的HBPM错误。最常见的错误报告是没有按照推荐的每日血压(BP)测量次数或时间表(57.14%),测量时没有支撑背部(35.71%),吃饭或喝咖啡与血压测量之间的间隔不足(35.71%),测量时说话(35.71%)和没有记录测量的BP值(35.71%)。最常被提及的负面结果是焦虑、高血压失控、自我用药和计划外急诊室就诊次数增加(各占40.0%)。这篇综述强调,许多高血压患者执行HBPM不准确,在会诊时可以通过专业指导来减轻错误。因此,医疗保健专业人员和服务必须致力于适当培训和授权患者正确执行这一程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Blood Pressure Monitoring 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research. This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书