Sex-based differences across the stages of the addiction cycle among adults with severe alcohol use disorder.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Anna Beth Parlier-Ahmad, Caitlin E Martin, Michelle Eglovitch, Alexis C Edwards, Nicole Boss, Lori A Keyser-Marcus, Kathryn Polak, F Gerard Moeller, Kenneth S Kendler, Dace S Svikis
{"title":"Sex-based differences across the stages of the addiction cycle among adults with severe alcohol use disorder.","authors":"Anna Beth Parlier-Ahmad, Caitlin E Martin, Michelle Eglovitch, Alexis C Edwards, Nicole Boss, Lori A Keyser-Marcus, Kathryn Polak, F Gerard Moeller, Kenneth S Kendler, Dace S Svikis","doi":"10.1093/alcalc/agaf064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Phenotyping approaches aim to understand heterogeneity in alcohol use disorder (AUD) using neurofunctional domains that are critical to the development and maintenance of the disease. This study explored sex-based differences across stages of the addiction cycle among adults with severe AUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary data analysis from the genes, addiction, and personality study includes adults who met criteria for severe AUD (lifetime). Sociodemographic, substance use history, and behavioral variables were collected via cross-sectional survey. Using the three-stage addiction cycle framework, neurofunctional-related factors were selected as proxy measures: Big Five Inventory Short Form Neuroticism Scale and DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (withdrawal/negative affect), Short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale and DSM-5 AUD craving item (preoccupation/anticipation), response to alcohol during the first five times drinking, and DSM-5 AUD withdrawal item (binge/intoxication). Sex differences were assessed using Chi square tests, t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (N = 5745; 34% male, 66% female) were predominately white (88%) and middle-aged (44 ± 14 years). Many reported polysubstance use (64.2%). Females were significantly more likely to have a MDD diagnosis and higher neuroticism scores than males. Females had significantly higher scores in negative urgency and lack of premeditation while males had higher sensation seeking scores. Males were more likely to have lower sensitivity to alcohol and endorse drinking to relieve withdrawal symptoms than females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a sex-informed approach is critical for the development and validation of AUD phenotyping tools as well as integration of phenotyping into AUD clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7407,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol and alcoholism","volume":"60 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12581830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol and alcoholism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agaf064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Phenotyping approaches aim to understand heterogeneity in alcohol use disorder (AUD) using neurofunctional domains that are critical to the development and maintenance of the disease. This study explored sex-based differences across stages of the addiction cycle among adults with severe AUD.

Methods: This secondary data analysis from the genes, addiction, and personality study includes adults who met criteria for severe AUD (lifetime). Sociodemographic, substance use history, and behavioral variables were collected via cross-sectional survey. Using the three-stage addiction cycle framework, neurofunctional-related factors were selected as proxy measures: Big Five Inventory Short Form Neuroticism Scale and DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (withdrawal/negative affect), Short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale and DSM-5 AUD craving item (preoccupation/anticipation), response to alcohol during the first five times drinking, and DSM-5 AUD withdrawal item (binge/intoxication). Sex differences were assessed using Chi square tests, t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: Participants (N = 5745; 34% male, 66% female) were predominately white (88%) and middle-aged (44 ± 14 years). Many reported polysubstance use (64.2%). Females were significantly more likely to have a MDD diagnosis and higher neuroticism scores than males. Females had significantly higher scores in negative urgency and lack of premeditation while males had higher sensation seeking scores. Males were more likely to have lower sensitivity to alcohol and endorse drinking to relieve withdrawal symptoms than females.

Conclusions: Using a sex-informed approach is critical for the development and validation of AUD phenotyping tools as well as integration of phenotyping into AUD clinical trials.

严重酒精使用障碍成人成瘾周期各阶段的性别差异
目的:表型方法旨在通过对疾病发展和维持至关重要的神经功能域来了解酒精使用障碍(AUD)的异质性。本研究探讨了严重AUD成人成瘾周期各阶段的性别差异。方法:这项来自基因、成瘾和人格研究的辅助数据分析包括符合严重AUD(终生)标准的成年人。通过横断面调查收集社会人口学、药物使用史和行为变量。采用三阶段成瘾周期框架,选择神经功能相关因素作为代理测量指标:大五量表短表神经质量表和DSM-5重度抑郁症(MDD)(戒断/负面影响),短表UPPS-P冲动行为量表和DSM-5 AUD渴望项目(专注/预期),前五次饮酒时对酒精的反应,以及DSM-5 AUD戒断项目(暴饮/中毒)。使用卡方检验、t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验评估性别差异。结果:参与者(N = 5745,男性34%,女性66%)以白人(88%)为主,中年(44±14岁)。许多报告使用多种物质(64.2%)。与男性相比,女性更有可能被诊断为重度抑郁症,神经质得分也更高。女性在消极紧迫感和缺乏预谋方面得分较高,而男性在寻求感觉方面得分较高。与女性相比,男性对酒精的敏感度更低,更倾向于通过饮酒来缓解戒断症状。结论:使用性别知情的方法对于AUD表型工具的开发和验证以及将表型整合到AUD临床试验中至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alcohol and alcoholism
Alcohol and alcoholism 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Alcohol and Alcoholism publishes papers on the biomedical, psychological, and sociological aspects of alcoholism and alcohol research, provided that they make a new and significant contribution to knowledge in the field. Papers include new results obtained experimentally, descriptions of new experimental (including clinical) methods of importance to the field of alcohol research and treatment, or new interpretations of existing results. Theoretical contributions are considered equally with papers dealing with experimental work provided that such theoretical contributions are not of a largely speculative or philosophical nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书