Influence of camera position, implant angulation and implant reference on the accuracy of complete arch implant recordings with photogrammetry.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-20 DOI:10.4047/jap.2025.17.5.292
Meriem Benabdallah-M'Rabat, Andrea Santamaria-Laorden, Sabina Francesca Bertuol-Gessi, Alicia Martínez-Marugán, Ana Suarez-García, Israel John Thuissard, Jaime Orejas-Pérez
{"title":"Influence of camera position, implant angulation and implant reference on the accuracy of complete arch implant recordings with photogrammetry.","authors":"Meriem Benabdallah-M'Rabat, Andrea Santamaria-Laorden, Sabina Francesca Bertuol-Gessi, Alicia Martínez-Marugán, Ana Suarez-García, Israel John Thuissard, Jaime Orejas-Pérez","doi":"10.4047/jap.2025.17.5.292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of various implant angulations, camera positions and number of implant references on the accuracy of a photogrammetry device for complete arch implant prostheses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>2 edentulous models, one with 6 parallel implants (PM) and other with 6 angled implants (AM), underwent digitalization with a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) to establish a reference standard. Both models underwent 20 impressions with 2 different camera positions and 3 different implant references, with a total of 240 impressions. Euclidean linear and angular measurements were obtained on the reference cast and each experimental scan and compared. Absolute (n) and relative frequencies (%) of true and precise measurements at 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Chi-squared tests were used to assess differences in trueness and precision between these factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3660 distances and 1440 angles were analyzed for trueness. The absolute difference was 54 ± 46 µm and 0.341 ± 0.301°. Precision was 18 ± 23 µm from 68400 measured distances and 0.048 ± 0.074° for the 22800 angulations measured. Statistically significant differences (<i>P</i> < .05) were identified between PM and Am, A1 and A2 and number of references in both distances and angulations for trueness and precision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implant angulations, camera positions and number of implant references used affected the precision and trueness of Precise Implant Capture (PIC) system. However, these differences did not show clinically relevant values.</p>","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":"17 5","pages":"292-303"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12575067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2025.17.5.292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of various implant angulations, camera positions and number of implant references on the accuracy of a photogrammetry device for complete arch implant prostheses.

Materials and methods: 2 edentulous models, one with 6 parallel implants (PM) and other with 6 angled implants (AM), underwent digitalization with a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) to establish a reference standard. Both models underwent 20 impressions with 2 different camera positions and 3 different implant references, with a total of 240 impressions. Euclidean linear and angular measurements were obtained on the reference cast and each experimental scan and compared. Absolute (n) and relative frequencies (%) of true and precise measurements at 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Chi-squared tests were used to assess differences in trueness and precision between these factors.

Results: 3660 distances and 1440 angles were analyzed for trueness. The absolute difference was 54 ± 46 µm and 0.341 ± 0.301°. Precision was 18 ± 23 µm from 68400 measured distances and 0.048 ± 0.074° for the 22800 angulations measured. Statistically significant differences (P < .05) were identified between PM and Am, A1 and A2 and number of references in both distances and angulations for trueness and precision.

Conclusion: Implant angulations, camera positions and number of implant references used affected the precision and trueness of Precise Implant Capture (PIC) system. However, these differences did not show clinically relevant values.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

相机位置、种植体角度和种植体参考对全弓种植体摄影测量记录精度的影响。
目的:本研究的目的是评估不同种植体角度、相机位置和种植体参考数量对全弓种植体假体摄影测量装置精度的影响。材料与方法:2个无牙模型,6个平行种植体(PM)和6个角度种植体(AM),用三坐标测量机(CMM)进行数字化,建立参考标准。两种模型在2种不同的相机位置和3种不同的植入物参考下进行了20次注射,总共240次注射。在参考铸件和每次实验扫描上获得欧几里得线性和角度测量值并进行比较。在95%置信区间(CI)计算真实和精确测量的绝对频率(n)和相对频率(%)。使用卡方检验来评估这些因素之间的真实度和精确度的差异。结果:对3660个距离和1440个角度进行了准确性分析。绝对差值分别为54±46µm和0.341±0.301°。测量距离为68400,精度为18±23µm,测量角度为22800,精度为0.048±0.074°。PM与Am、A1与A2、参考文献数量在距离和角度上的真实度和精度差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:种植体角度、相机位置和种植体参考数影响了精确种植体捕获(PIC)系统的精度和真实度。然而,这些差异并没有显示出临床相关价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics. This journal publishes • Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants. • Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics. • Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书