How visual is the "groupitizing"? The impact of visual deprivation over its emergence.

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Cognitive Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-03 DOI:10.1080/02643294.2025.2576743
Andrea Adriano, Lorenzo Ciccione, Minye Zhan
{"title":"How visual is the \"groupitizing\"? The impact of visual deprivation over its emergence.","authors":"Andrea Adriano, Lorenzo Ciccione, Minye Zhan","doi":"10.1080/02643294.2025.2576743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research showed that people enumerate objects faster and more accurately when they form clusters, a phenomenon called \"groupitizing\". While mainly studied visually, its dependence on vision is unclear. Congenitally blind (CB) individuals provide a critical test: if vision is essential, CB people should lack groupitizing; if not, they may apply it across modalities, potentially outperforming sighted participants. We compared CB and sighted adults on an auditory groupitizing task, based on the estimation of 5-12 pure tones presented either randomly or grouped by temporal proximity. Both groups showed lower errors and higher precision for grouped sequences, confirming that groupitizing can emerge without visual experience. Importantly, for larger numerosities, sighted individuals' grouping benefit decreased, whereas CB participants maintained robust advantages across all set sizes. These findings suggest that groupitizing relies on amodal perceptual mechanisms and that congenital blindness may enhance auditory enumeration strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50670,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"310-325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2025.2576743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research showed that people enumerate objects faster and more accurately when they form clusters, a phenomenon called "groupitizing". While mainly studied visually, its dependence on vision is unclear. Congenitally blind (CB) individuals provide a critical test: if vision is essential, CB people should lack groupitizing; if not, they may apply it across modalities, potentially outperforming sighted participants. We compared CB and sighted adults on an auditory groupitizing task, based on the estimation of 5-12 pure tones presented either randomly or grouped by temporal proximity. Both groups showed lower errors and higher precision for grouped sequences, confirming that groupitizing can emerge without visual experience. Importantly, for larger numerosities, sighted individuals' grouping benefit decreased, whereas CB participants maintained robust advantages across all set sizes. These findings suggest that groupitizing relies on amodal perceptual mechanisms and that congenital blindness may enhance auditory enumeration strategies.

“分组”的视觉效果如何?视觉剥夺对其产生的影响。
先前的研究表明,当物体形成集群时,人们会更快、更准确地列举出物体,这种现象被称为“分组”。虽然主要研究视觉,但其对视觉的依赖性尚不清楚。先天失明(CB)个体提供了一个关键的测试:如果视力是必不可少的,那么先天失明的人应该缺乏分组;如果没有,他们可能会把它应用到不同的模式中,可能会超过视力正常的参与者。我们在一项听觉分组任务中比较了CB和视力正常的成年人,该任务基于对5-12个纯音的估计,这些纯音要么是随机呈现的,要么是按时间接近度分组的。两组都显示出较低的错误率和较高的分组序列精度,证实了分组可以在没有视觉经验的情况下出现。重要的是,对于更大的数字,视力良好的个体的分组利益下降,而CB参与者在所有集合规模上都保持着强大的优势。这些发现表明,分组依赖于模态知觉机制,先天性失明可能会增强听觉枚举策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Cognitive Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychology is of interest to cognitive scientists and neuroscientists, neuropsychologists, neurologists, psycholinguists, speech pathologists, physiotherapists, and psychiatrists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书