Mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H) in rectal cancer patients treated with standard neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer treatment reviews Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2025.103039
Gianluca Ricco , Chiara Gallio , Nada Benhima , Irene Assaf , Jean-Luc Van Laethem , Francesco Sclafani
{"title":"Mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H) in rectal cancer patients treated with standard neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Gianluca Ricco ,&nbsp;Chiara Gallio ,&nbsp;Nada Benhima ,&nbsp;Irene Assaf ,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Van Laethem ,&nbsp;Francesco Sclafani","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2025.103039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H) is an established biomarker in early-stage colon cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. However, its prognostic significance in early-stage rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy remains uncertain. We aimed to fill this gap by conducting a systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis of the available evidence. PubMed, Embase and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to 11/03/2025 for studies comparing the outcome of dMMR/MSI-H and MMR proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors were excluded. Data on pathologic complete response (pCR), pathologic tumor regression grade (pTRG), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) were calculated using a random effects model. After screening 705 records, 26 retrospective studies were included, the majority of patients being treated with long-course chemoradiotherapy. There was a significant association between dMMR/MSI-H status and pCR (OR 1.50 [95 % CI: 1.04–2.14]; p = 0.03), while no association was found for pTRG (OR 0.77 [95 % CI: 0.44–1.34]; p = 0.326), DFS (HR 1.00 [95 % CI: 0.50–2.01]; p = 0.998) and OS (HR 1.42 [95 % CI: 1.00–2.01]; p = 0.051). Despite the limited data, subgroup analyses did not appear to reveal any significant difference by type of neoadjuvant treatment. In conclusion, patients with dMMR/MSI-H rectal cancer treated with standard neoadjuvant therapy are more likely to achieve a pCR than those with pMMR/MSS tumors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 103039"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737225001616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H) is an established biomarker in early-stage colon cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. However, its prognostic significance in early-stage rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy remains uncertain. We aimed to fill this gap by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence. PubMed, Embase and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to 11/03/2025 for studies comparing the outcome of dMMR/MSI-H and MMR proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors were excluded. Data on pathologic complete response (pCR), pathologic tumor regression grade (pTRG), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) were calculated using a random effects model. After screening 705 records, 26 retrospective studies were included, the majority of patients being treated with long-course chemoradiotherapy. There was a significant association between dMMR/MSI-H status and pCR (OR 1.50 [95 % CI: 1.04–2.14]; p = 0.03), while no association was found for pTRG (OR 0.77 [95 % CI: 0.44–1.34]; p = 0.326), DFS (HR 1.00 [95 % CI: 0.50–2.01]; p = 0.998) and OS (HR 1.42 [95 % CI: 1.00–2.01]; p = 0.051). Despite the limited data, subgroup analyses did not appear to reveal any significant difference by type of neoadjuvant treatment. In conclusion, patients with dMMR/MSI-H rectal cancer treated with standard neoadjuvant therapy are more likely to achieve a pCR than those with pMMR/MSS tumors.
标准新辅助治疗在直肠癌患者中的错配修复缺陷/微卫星不稳定性(dMMR/MSI-H):一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
错配修复缺陷或微卫星不稳定性(dMMR/MSI-H)是早期结肠癌和转移性结直肠癌的既定生物标志物。然而,其在早期直肠癌患者新辅助治疗中的预后意义尚不确定。我们旨在通过对现有证据进行系统回顾和荟萃分析来填补这一空白。系统检索PubMed, Embase和Scopus,从成立到2025年3月11日,比较dMMR/MSI-H和MMR精通/微卫星稳定(pMMR/MSS)直肠癌患者接受新辅助治疗的结果。排除了免疫检查点抑制剂的研究。提取病理完全缓解(pCR)、病理肿瘤消退分级(pTRG)、无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)数据。采用随机效应模型计算合并优势比(ORs)和风险比(hr)及其95%置信区间(95% CI)。在筛选了705份记录后,纳入了26项回顾性研究,大多数患者接受了长疗程的放化疗。dMMR/MSI-H状态与pCR (OR 1.50 [95% CI: 1.04-2.14]; p = 0.03)有显著相关性,而pTRG (OR 0.77 [95% CI: 0.44-1.34]; p = 0.326)、DFS (HR 1.00 [95% CI: 0.50-2.01]; p = 0.998)和OS (HR 1.42 [95% CI: 1.00-2.01]; p = 0.051)无相关性。尽管数据有限,亚组分析似乎没有显示新辅助治疗类型的任何显著差异。总之,采用标准新辅助治疗的dMMR/MSI-H直肠癌患者比pMMR/MSS肿瘤患者更有可能实现pCR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书