Case study on the evaluation of skin sensitization for 23 selected fragrance ingredients using a defined approach based on OECD Guideline 497.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Toxicological Research Pub Date : 2025-07-09 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI:10.1007/s43188-025-00303-1
Hyejin Kim, Kwangsik Park
{"title":"Case study on the evaluation of skin sensitization for 23 selected fragrance ingredients using a defined approach based on OECD Guideline 497.","authors":"Hyejin Kim, Kwangsik Park","doi":"10.1007/s43188-025-00303-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty-three single-ingredient substances, selected from materials labeled as allergens in cosmetic fragrances, were assessed for skin sensitization potential using a defined approach (DA) based on the OECD Guideline 497 Integrated Testing Strategy version 2 (ITSv2). According to the ITSv2, skin hypersensitivity data for these selected substances were integrated. In chemico data (from the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay, DPRA) and in vitro data (from the human Cell Line Activation Test, h-CLAT) were obtained from existing databases, while in silico data were generated via the automated workflow of the OECD QSAR Toolbox. The DA for skin sensitization, which combines QSAR predictions with DPRA and h-CLAT test results, categorized 17 substances, including 2-benzylideneheptanal, as \"Sensitizers\"; 5 substances, including 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, as \"Inconclusive\"; and citronellol alone was categorized as \"Not Classified.\" The outcomes from the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for substances identified as skin sensitizers by the DA method demonstrated similar classification patterns to those from DA. These results underscore the necessity of integrating comprehensive in vitro, in chemico, and in silico data for accurate evaluation of potential skin sensitizers. This case study could aid in enhancing the safety assessments of potential skin sensitizers using DA; however, final categorization is subject to validation by regulatory authorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23181,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Research","volume":"41 6","pages":"601-610"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12569283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-025-00303-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twenty-three single-ingredient substances, selected from materials labeled as allergens in cosmetic fragrances, were assessed for skin sensitization potential using a defined approach (DA) based on the OECD Guideline 497 Integrated Testing Strategy version 2 (ITSv2). According to the ITSv2, skin hypersensitivity data for these selected substances were integrated. In chemico data (from the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay, DPRA) and in vitro data (from the human Cell Line Activation Test, h-CLAT) were obtained from existing databases, while in silico data were generated via the automated workflow of the OECD QSAR Toolbox. The DA for skin sensitization, which combines QSAR predictions with DPRA and h-CLAT test results, categorized 17 substances, including 2-benzylideneheptanal, as "Sensitizers"; 5 substances, including 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, as "Inconclusive"; and citronellol alone was categorized as "Not Classified." The outcomes from the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for substances identified as skin sensitizers by the DA method demonstrated similar classification patterns to those from DA. These results underscore the necessity of integrating comprehensive in vitro, in chemico, and in silico data for accurate evaluation of potential skin sensitizers. This case study could aid in enhancing the safety assessments of potential skin sensitizers using DA; however, final categorization is subject to validation by regulatory authorities.

使用基于OECD指南497的定义方法对23种选定香料成分的皮肤致敏性进行评估的案例研究。
从化妆品香料中标记为过敏原的材料中选择23种单成分物质,使用基于经合组织指南497综合测试策略第2版(ITSv2)的定义方法(DA)评估皮肤致敏潜力。根据ITSv2,对这些选定物质的皮肤过敏数据进行了整合。化学数据(来自直接肽反应试验,DPRA)和体外数据(来自人类细胞系激活试验,h-CLAT)从现有数据库中获得,而计算机数据通过OECD QSAR工具箱的自动化工作流程生成。皮肤致敏DA将QSAR预测与dpa和h-CLAT测试结果相结合,将17种物质分类为“致敏剂”,包括2-苄基庚醛;5种物质,包括4-甲氧基苄基醇,列为“不确定”;而香茅醛则被归类为“未分类”。局部淋巴结测定(LLNA)中经DA方法鉴定为皮肤致敏物质的结果与DA方法的分类模式相似。这些结果强调了整合全面的体外、化学和计算机数据以准确评估潜在皮肤致敏剂的必要性。本案例研究有助于加强使用DA对潜在皮肤致敏剂的安全性评估;然而,最终的分类需要得到监管机构的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Toxicological Research is the official journal of the Korean Society of Toxicology. The journal covers all areas of Toxicological Research of chemicals, drugs and environmental agents affecting human and animals, which in turn impact public health. The journal’s mission is to disseminate scientific and technical information on diverse areas of toxicological research. Contributions by toxicologists, molecular biologists, geneticists, biochemists, pharmacologists, clinical researchers and epidemiologists with a global view on public health through toxicological research are welcome. Emphasis will be given to articles providing an understanding of the toxicological mechanisms affecting animal, human and public health. In the case of research articles using natural extracts, detailed information with respect to the origin, extraction method, chemical profiles, and characterization of standard compounds to ensure the reproducible pharmacological activity should be provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书