Can Large Language Models Generate Useful Linguistic Corpora?: A Case Study of the Word Frequency Effect in Young German Readers.

Q1 Social Sciences
Open Mind Pub Date : 2025-10-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1162/OPMI.a.30
Job Schepens, Hanna Woloszyn, Nicole Marx, Benjamin Gagl
{"title":"Can Large Language Models Generate Useful Linguistic Corpora?: A Case Study of the Word Frequency Effect in Young German Readers.","authors":"Job Schepens, Hanna Woloszyn, Nicole Marx, Benjamin Gagl","doi":"10.1162/OPMI.a.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Linguistic corpora are an essential resource in psycholinguistic research. Here, we generate new corpora using large language models (LLMs) and determine their usefulness for estimating the word frequency effect on reading performance, focusing on German children. We prompted three different LLMs to create corpora of children's stories using the titles of 500 books, mimicking an existing corpus of children's books (childLex). In Experiment 1, we found that word frequency correlated strongly between childLex and the LLM corpora, despite a lower lexical richness of LLM text. Compared to childLex, we found that the estimated effect size of the LLM-based word frequency effect was lower, but that it explained more variance in reading performance (using reaction times for about 1000 words in a lexical decision task). In Experiment 2, we found that prompting for children-directed text results in word frequency that better fits to child compared to adult reading times, and also that increasing temperature can increase lexical richness. In Experiment 3, we replicated Experiment 1 using two open-weight LLMs. Across all 10 corpora (out of which 9 were LLM-based), we found that corpora with lower lexical richness generally fit better to reaction times. We discuss the potential of this approach, considering the risks associated with utilizing highly complex large language models (LLMs).</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"1597-1656"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12571048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/OPMI.a.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Linguistic corpora are an essential resource in psycholinguistic research. Here, we generate new corpora using large language models (LLMs) and determine their usefulness for estimating the word frequency effect on reading performance, focusing on German children. We prompted three different LLMs to create corpora of children's stories using the titles of 500 books, mimicking an existing corpus of children's books (childLex). In Experiment 1, we found that word frequency correlated strongly between childLex and the LLM corpora, despite a lower lexical richness of LLM text. Compared to childLex, we found that the estimated effect size of the LLM-based word frequency effect was lower, but that it explained more variance in reading performance (using reaction times for about 1000 words in a lexical decision task). In Experiment 2, we found that prompting for children-directed text results in word frequency that better fits to child compared to adult reading times, and also that increasing temperature can increase lexical richness. In Experiment 3, we replicated Experiment 1 using two open-weight LLMs. Across all 10 corpora (out of which 9 were LLM-based), we found that corpora with lower lexical richness generally fit better to reaction times. We discuss the potential of this approach, considering the risks associated with utilizing highly complex large language models (LLMs).

大型语言模型能生成有用的语料库吗?德语青年读者词频效应的个案研究
语料库是心理语言学研究的重要资源。在这里,我们使用大型语言模型(llm)生成新的语料库,并确定它们对估计词频对阅读表现的影响的有用性,重点是德国儿童。我们促使三个不同的法学硕士使用500本书的标题创建儿童故事语料库,模仿现有的儿童书籍语料库(childLex)。在实验1中,我们发现尽管LLM文本的词汇丰富度较低,但childLex与LLM语料库之间的词频相关性很强。与childLex相比,我们发现基于llm的词频效应的估计效应量更低,但它解释了阅读表现的更多差异(在词汇决策任务中使用大约1000个单词的反应时间)。在实验2中,我们发现针对儿童的文本提示的词频比成人阅读时间更适合儿童,并且温度升高可以增加词汇丰富度。在实验3中,我们使用两个开重llm重复实验1。在所有10个语料库中(其中9个是基于法学硕士的),我们发现词汇丰富度较低的语料库通常更适合反应时间。我们讨论了这种方法的潜力,考虑了与使用高度复杂的大型语言模型(llm)相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书