Evaluating the Role of Baseline Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Predicting Heart Failure Post-acute Coronary Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 0.5 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart Views Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_125_24
Alivia Retra Kusumowardani, Narendra Lintang Yudhisthira
{"title":"Evaluating the Role of Baseline Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Predicting Heart Failure Post-acute Coronary Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Alivia Retra Kusumowardani, Narendra Lintang Yudhisthira","doi":"10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_125_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a frequent complication following acute coronary syndrome (ACS), leading to higher mortality and rehospitalization rates. Measurement of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is well established to diagnose HF, and its levels during ACS have been associated with poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aims to assess the predictive value of baseline BNP in determining the risk of HF following ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search for relevant studies was conducted through Medline database, focusing on studies that reported baseline BN<i>P</i> values in ACS patients, the incidence of HF after follow-up, and their possible association. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 647 studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies showed a positive association between baseline BNP and HF post-ACS. However, the meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in HF occurrence based on baseline BNP levels (odds ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11-29.07, <i>P</i> = 0.67). Although the development of HF was significantly correlated with higher baseline BNP (standard mean difference: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.54-1.37, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated baseline BNP levels were associated with an increased likelihood of HF following ACS. However, BNP alone may not be a reliable predictor. Serial measurements and integration with other risk factors may improve its predictive accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":32654,"journal":{"name":"Heart Views","volume":"26 2","pages":"116-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12571093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Views","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_125_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Heart failure (HF) is a frequent complication following acute coronary syndrome (ACS), leading to higher mortality and rehospitalization rates. Measurement of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is well established to diagnose HF, and its levels during ACS have been associated with poor outcomes.

Aims: This review aims to assess the predictive value of baseline BNP in determining the risk of HF following ACS.

Methods: The search for relevant studies was conducted through Medline database, focusing on studies that reported baseline BNP values in ACS patients, the incidence of HF after follow-up, and their possible association. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager.

Results: Out of 647 studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies showed a positive association between baseline BNP and HF post-ACS. However, the meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in HF occurrence based on baseline BNP levels (odds ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11-29.07, P = 0.67). Although the development of HF was significantly correlated with higher baseline BNP (standard mean difference: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.54-1.37, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Elevated baseline BNP levels were associated with an increased likelihood of HF following ACS. However, BNP alone may not be a reliable predictor. Serial measurements and integration with other risk factors may improve its predictive accuracy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估基线脑利钠肽在预测急性冠脉综合征后心力衰竭中的作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:心力衰竭(HF)是急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后常见的并发症,导致较高的死亡率和再住院率。测定脑钠肽(BNP)已被广泛用于诊断心衰,其在ACS期间的水平与不良预后相关。目的:本综述旨在评估基线BNP在确定ACS后HF风险方面的预测价值。方法:通过Medline数据库检索相关研究,重点关注ACS患者基线BNP值、随访后HF发生率及其可能关联的研究。使用Review Manager进行统计分析。结果:647项研究中,10项符合纳入标准。8项研究显示基线BNP与acs后HF呈正相关。然而,meta分析显示,基于基线BNP水平的HF发生率无显著差异(优势比1.83,95%可信区间[CI]: 0.11-29.07, P = 0.67)。尽管HF的发展与基线BNP升高显著相关(标准平均差:0.95,95% CI: 0.54-1.37, P < 0.001)。结论:基线BNP水平升高与ACS后HF的可能性增加有关。然而,单靠BNP可能不是一个可靠的预测指标。连续测量和与其他危险因素的整合可以提高其预测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Views
Heart Views CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书