From Likert Scales to Large Language Models: Validating a Computational Approach to Psychological Assessment of Future Self-Continuity.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-30 DOI:10.1080/00223891.2025.2576664
Yosef Sokol, Marianne Goodman
{"title":"From Likert Scales to Large Language Models: Validating a Computational Approach to Psychological Assessment of Future Self-Continuity.","authors":"Yosef Sokol, Marianne Goodman","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2576664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new assessment approaches that can help overcome the limitations of traditional Likert-item scales in measuring complex, subjective constructs. To demonstrate this, we introduce and validate a novel LLM-based methodology for psychological assessment by applying it to Future Self-Continuity (FSC), the perceived connection, including similarity, vividness, and positivity, between present and future selves. We used an LLM (Claude 3.5 Sonnet) to perform natural language processing (NLP) on transcripts of audio responses to 15 theory-based interview prompts. Data from 164 MTurk participants (including 93 with past-year suicide ideation, who were oversampled to examine clinical utility) yielded quantitative NLP-FSC scores that significantly correlated with the Future Self-Continuity Questionnaire (FSCQ; <i>r</i> = 0.57), supporting convergent validity. A Bland-Altman analysis also indicated acceptable agreement. Replication using one older and two updated LLM versions confirmed the method's robustness (inter-model total score <i>r</i> = 0.91, 0.88, and 0.84). Exploratory analysis using the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQR) found that the NLP assessment captured unique variance in the perceived likelihood of a future suicide attempt beyond the FSCQ, suggesting potential clinical implications. This validated NLP approach offers a nuanced assessment of FSC, advancing psychological measurement methodology in research and, potentially, clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"437-447"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2576664","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new assessment approaches that can help overcome the limitations of traditional Likert-item scales in measuring complex, subjective constructs. To demonstrate this, we introduce and validate a novel LLM-based methodology for psychological assessment by applying it to Future Self-Continuity (FSC), the perceived connection, including similarity, vividness, and positivity, between present and future selves. We used an LLM (Claude 3.5 Sonnet) to perform natural language processing (NLP) on transcripts of audio responses to 15 theory-based interview prompts. Data from 164 MTurk participants (including 93 with past-year suicide ideation, who were oversampled to examine clinical utility) yielded quantitative NLP-FSC scores that significantly correlated with the Future Self-Continuity Questionnaire (FSCQ; r = 0.57), supporting convergent validity. A Bland-Altman analysis also indicated acceptable agreement. Replication using one older and two updated LLM versions confirmed the method's robustness (inter-model total score r = 0.91, 0.88, and 0.84). Exploratory analysis using the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQR) found that the NLP assessment captured unique variance in the perceived likelihood of a future suicide attempt beyond the FSCQ, suggesting potential clinical implications. This validated NLP approach offers a nuanced assessment of FSC, advancing psychological measurement methodology in research and, potentially, clinical practice.

从李克特量表到大型语言模型:验证未来自我连续性心理评估的计算方法。
大型语言模型(llm)的最新进展提供了新的评估方法,可以帮助克服传统李克特项目量表在测量复杂主观结构方面的局限性。为了证明这一点,我们引入并验证了一种新的基于法学硕士的心理评估方法,将其应用于未来自我连续性(FSC),即现在和未来自我之间的感知联系,包括相似性、生动性和积极性。我们使用法学硕士(克劳德3.5十四行诗)对15个基于理论的面试提示的音频回答文本进行自然语言处理(NLP)。来自164名MTurk参与者的数据(包括93名过去一年有自杀念头的人,他们被抽样以检验临床效用)得出了定量的NLP-FSC分数,该分数与未来自我连续性问卷(FSCQ; r = 0.57)显著相关,支持收敛效度。布兰德-奥特曼的分析也表明了可以接受的共识。使用一个旧版本和两个更新版本的LLM进行复制证实了该方法的稳健性(模型间总分r = 0.91, 0.88和0.84)。使用自杀行为问卷(SBQR)的探索性分析发现,NLP评估在FSCQ之外捕获了未来自杀企图的感知可能性的独特差异,这表明了潜在的临床意义。这种经过验证的NLP方法为FSC提供了细致入微的评估,在研究和潜在的临床实践中推进了心理测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书