Antibiotic-mediated prophage activation: Mechanisms, consequences, and therapeutic implications

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Damir Gavric, Petar Knezevic
{"title":"Antibiotic-mediated prophage activation: Mechanisms, consequences, and therapeutic implications","authors":"Damir Gavric,&nbsp;Petar Knezevic","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Prophages, as an integral part of bacterial genomes, play a pivotal role in regulating host virulence and shaping bacterial evolution. Exposure to antibiotics, particularly those that cause DNA damage, can trigger a shift from lysogeny to the lytic cycle, i.e., initiate prophage induction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review compares the effects of various antibiotic classes on prophage induction, with particular emphasis on the associated clinical consequences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This process can lead to undesirable consequences, such as increased toxin production, enhanced transduction frequency, and modulation of host phenotypes and virulence traits. Among the most potent inducers are fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin, which activate stx-harbouring prophages in enterohemorrhagic <em>Escherichia coli</em> (EHEC), resulting in elevated Shiga toxin production and disease exacerbation. This effect is primarily mediated through activation of the bacterial SOS response, although other mechanisms may also contribute. Similarly, subinhibitory concentrations of certain β-lactams, sulphonamides, nitrofurans, and fosfomycin can induce prophages, although the extent of induction varies depending on the antibiotic concentration, phage type, bacterial strain, and detection methodology. The antibiotics that predominantly suppress or inhibit phage induction are aminoglycosides, some macrolides, and newer generation tetracyclines.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Further studies on antibiotic-mediated phage induction, particularly those focusing on elucidating the underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon, are necessary to maximize its beneficial effects and minimize potential adverse outcomes during therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":"67 1","pages":"Article 107655"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857925002109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Prophages, as an integral part of bacterial genomes, play a pivotal role in regulating host virulence and shaping bacterial evolution. Exposure to antibiotics, particularly those that cause DNA damage, can trigger a shift from lysogeny to the lytic cycle, i.e., initiate prophage induction.

Methods

This review compares the effects of various antibiotic classes on prophage induction, with particular emphasis on the associated clinical consequences.

Results

This process can lead to undesirable consequences, such as increased toxin production, enhanced transduction frequency, and modulation of host phenotypes and virulence traits. Among the most potent inducers are fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin, which activate stx-harbouring prophages in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), resulting in elevated Shiga toxin production and disease exacerbation. This effect is primarily mediated through activation of the bacterial SOS response, although other mechanisms may also contribute. Similarly, subinhibitory concentrations of certain β-lactams, sulphonamides, nitrofurans, and fosfomycin can induce prophages, although the extent of induction varies depending on the antibiotic concentration, phage type, bacterial strain, and detection methodology. The antibiotics that predominantly suppress or inhibit phage induction are aminoglycosides, some macrolides, and newer generation tetracyclines.

Conclusions

Further studies on antibiotic-mediated phage induction, particularly those focusing on elucidating the underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon, are necessary to maximize its beneficial effects and minimize potential adverse outcomes during therapy.
抗生素介导的噬菌体激活:机制、后果和治疗意义。
原噬菌体作为细菌基因组的重要组成部分,在调节宿主毒力和塑造细菌进化过程中发挥着关键作用。暴露于抗生素,特别是那些引起DNA损伤的抗生素,可以触发从溶原性到溶解周期的转变,即启动前噬菌体诱导。这一过程可能导致不良后果,如毒素产生增加,转导频率增强,以及宿主表型和毒力性状的调节。这篇综述评估了不同种类的抗生素对噬菌体诱导的影响,特别强调了相关的临床后果。其中最有效的诱诱剂是氟喹诺酮类药物,如环丙沙星,可激活肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)中含有stx的噬菌体,导致志贺毒素产生升高和疾病恶化。这种效应主要是通过激活细菌SOS反应介导的,尽管其他机制也可能起作用。同样,某些β-内酰胺类、磺胺类、硝基呋喃类和磷霉素的亚抑制浓度可以诱导噬菌体,尽管诱导程度取决于抗生素浓度、噬菌体类型、细菌菌株和检测方法。主要抑制或抑制噬菌体诱导的抗生素是氨基糖苷类、一些大环内酯类和新一代四环素类。对抗生素介导的噬菌体诱导的进一步研究,特别是那些专注于阐明这一现象的潜在机制的研究,对于最大限度地发挥其有益作用并最大限度地减少治疗期间潜在的不良后果是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书