Comparing the efficacy of two antibiotic cocktails in decontamination of cardiovascular tissues.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Alina Levy, Helit Cohen, Nadezda Savieva, Meytal Neeman-Azulay, Natasha Belausov, Ehud Raanani, David Mishali, Rachel Kornhaber, Michelle Cleary, Jonathan Esensten, Sharon Amit, Ayelet Di Segni
{"title":"Comparing the efficacy of two antibiotic cocktails in decontamination of cardiovascular tissues.","authors":"Alina Levy, Helit Cohen, Nadezda Savieva, Meytal Neeman-Azulay, Natasha Belausov, Ehud Raanani, David Mishali, Rachel Kornhaber, Michelle Cleary, Jonathan Esensten, Sharon Amit, Ayelet Di Segni","doi":"10.1007/s10561-025-10198-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular allografts are essential for patients with severe cardiovascular diseases. Yet, microbial contamination of the grafts poses a life-threatening risk to recipients. Tissue banks utilize various decontamination methods during cardiovascular tissue processing, often involving antibiotic solutions. This study compares the efficacy of an in-house prepared antibiotic cocktail (tissue bank cocktail) and a commercially available solution (BASE.128) in decontaminating cardiovascular tissues. For this study, the efficacy of the two antibiotic cocktails was compared through quantitative comparisons against challenge microorganisms, and retrospective analysis of routine sterility tests. Both solutions demonstrated comparable decontamination efficiency against challenge strains, achieving significant reductions in bacterial load. However, retrospective sterility tests revealed that while both antibiotic solutions were highly effective in decontaminating cardiovascular allografts, the use of BASE.128 followed a tenfold increase in contamination rates compared to the tissue bank cocktail, primarily due to a slow-growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria strain. These findings highlight the importance of tailored decontamination protocols that consider prevalent microbial contaminants while preserving tissue quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9723,"journal":{"name":"Cell and Tissue Banking","volume":"26 4","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12575547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell and Tissue Banking","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-025-10198-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiovascular allografts are essential for patients with severe cardiovascular diseases. Yet, microbial contamination of the grafts poses a life-threatening risk to recipients. Tissue banks utilize various decontamination methods during cardiovascular tissue processing, often involving antibiotic solutions. This study compares the efficacy of an in-house prepared antibiotic cocktail (tissue bank cocktail) and a commercially available solution (BASE.128) in decontaminating cardiovascular tissues. For this study, the efficacy of the two antibiotic cocktails was compared through quantitative comparisons against challenge microorganisms, and retrospective analysis of routine sterility tests. Both solutions demonstrated comparable decontamination efficiency against challenge strains, achieving significant reductions in bacterial load. However, retrospective sterility tests revealed that while both antibiotic solutions were highly effective in decontaminating cardiovascular allografts, the use of BASE.128 followed a tenfold increase in contamination rates compared to the tissue bank cocktail, primarily due to a slow-growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria strain. These findings highlight the importance of tailored decontamination protocols that consider prevalent microbial contaminants while preserving tissue quality.

Abstract Image

两种抗生素鸡尾酒对心血管组织去污效果的比较。
心血管异体移植对于严重心血管疾病患者是必不可少的。然而,移植物的微生物污染对受者构成威胁生命的危险。组织库在心血管组织处理过程中使用各种去污方法,通常涉及抗生素溶液。本研究比较了内部制备的抗生素鸡尾酒(组织库鸡尾酒)和市售溶液(BASE.128)在净化心血管组织方面的效果。在本研究中,通过对攻毒微生物的定量比较和常规无菌检查的回顾性分析,比较了两种抗生素鸡尾酒的疗效。两种解决方案对挑战菌株表现出相当的去污效率,实现了细菌负荷的显著减少。然而,回顾性无菌试验显示,虽然这两种抗生素溶液对去污心血管同种异体移植物都非常有效,但与组织库鸡尾酒相比,使用BASE.128的污染率增加了10倍,主要是由于生长缓慢的非结核分枝杆菌菌株。这些发现强调了在保持组织质量的同时考虑普遍存在的微生物污染物的定制去污方案的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cell and Tissue Banking
Cell and Tissue Banking CELL BIOLOGY-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cell and Tissue Banking provides a forum for disseminating information to scientists and clinicians involved in the banking and transplantation of cells and tissues. Cell and Tissue Banking is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers in the following areas: basic research concerning general aspects of tissue banking such as quality assurance and control of banked cells/tissues, effects of preservation and sterilisation methods on cells/tissues, biotechnology, etc.; clinical applications of banked cells/tissues; standards of practice in procurement, processing, storage and distribution of cells/tissues; ethical issues; medico-legal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书