Does the Reduction of Sexual Abstinence Influence Sperm DNA Fragmentation? Exploring the Relationship Between the Two Parameters

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ANDROLOGY
Andrologia Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI:10.1155/and/2060268
Stefano Castellano, Edoardo Carnesi, Elena Albani, Ozgur Bulbul, Antonella Smeraldi, Massimo Romano, Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
{"title":"Does the Reduction of Sexual Abstinence Influence Sperm DNA Fragmentation? Exploring the Relationship Between the Two Parameters","authors":"Stefano Castellano,&nbsp;Edoardo Carnesi,&nbsp;Elena Albani,&nbsp;Ozgur Bulbul,&nbsp;Antonella Smeraldi,&nbsp;Massimo Romano,&nbsp;Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti","doi":"10.1155/and/2060268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The exact mechanisms underlying age-related sperm decline remain unclear. Factors like increased free radicals and prolonged sexual abstinence (SA) have been explored in literature. Recent studies suggest that shorter SA may positively affect sperm parameters, though results are controversial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective analysis investigated whether reduced SA provides measurable benefits for sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in patsperm DNA fragmentationients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), across different age groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>1030 patients underwent both sperm analysis and SDF evaluation. The dataset was both studied entirely and split in groups with generalized linear model (GLM) and quantile regression analyses. Primarily, we considered four groups based on patients’ age (≤38 and &gt;38 years) and days of SA (0–3 and 4–7 days); then, we examined two age-based groups (≤38 and &gt;38 years).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>SA emerged as a significant predictor of SDF (<i>p</i> = 0.020), with a stronger effect observed in patients &gt;38 years (<i>p</i> = 0.013). No significant interaction between age and SA was found in the general model (<i>p</i> = 0.524), but stratified analysis revealed a threshold effect, where prolonged SA was particularly detrimental in older individuals. Quantile regression further confirmed that SA had the most pronounced impact on patients with higher baseline DNA fragmentation index (DFI), suggesting that oxidative stress accumulates disproportionately in this subgroup.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings highlight the complex interplay between age, SA, and DFI, demonstrating that prolonged abstinence is especially detrimental for older men. Unlike previous studies, we introduce a threshold effect, emphasizing that the impact of SA is not uniform across all individuals. The use of quantile regression allows a more refined assessment, revealing that those with pre-existing sperm DNA damage are more susceptible. These results suggest that standard World Health Organization (WHO-recommended abstinence windows may not be optimal for all patients, particularly in ART settings. However, the clinical significance of these findings requires careful consideration of the trade-offs between DFI improvement and potential impacts on conventional sperm parameters, advocating for more individualized SA guidelines to improve reproductive outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7817,"journal":{"name":"Andrologia","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/and/2060268","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/and/2060268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The exact mechanisms underlying age-related sperm decline remain unclear. Factors like increased free radicals and prolonged sexual abstinence (SA) have been explored in literature. Recent studies suggest that shorter SA may positively affect sperm parameters, though results are controversial.

Objectives

This retrospective analysis investigated whether reduced SA provides measurable benefits for sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in patsperm DNA fragmentationients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), across different age groups.

Methods

1030 patients underwent both sperm analysis and SDF evaluation. The dataset was both studied entirely and split in groups with generalized linear model (GLM) and quantile regression analyses. Primarily, we considered four groups based on patients’ age (≤38 and >38 years) and days of SA (0–3 and 4–7 days); then, we examined two age-based groups (≤38 and >38 years).

Results

SA emerged as a significant predictor of SDF (p = 0.020), with a stronger effect observed in patients >38 years (p = 0.013). No significant interaction between age and SA was found in the general model (p = 0.524), but stratified analysis revealed a threshold effect, where prolonged SA was particularly detrimental in older individuals. Quantile regression further confirmed that SA had the most pronounced impact on patients with higher baseline DNA fragmentation index (DFI), suggesting that oxidative stress accumulates disproportionately in this subgroup.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the complex interplay between age, SA, and DFI, demonstrating that prolonged abstinence is especially detrimental for older men. Unlike previous studies, we introduce a threshold effect, emphasizing that the impact of SA is not uniform across all individuals. The use of quantile regression allows a more refined assessment, revealing that those with pre-existing sperm DNA damage are more susceptible. These results suggest that standard World Health Organization (WHO-recommended abstinence windows may not be optimal for all patients, particularly in ART settings. However, the clinical significance of these findings requires careful consideration of the trade-offs between DFI improvement and potential impacts on conventional sperm parameters, advocating for more individualized SA guidelines to improve reproductive outcomes.

减少性节制是否影响精子DNA断裂?探索两个参数之间的关系
与年龄相关的精子减少的确切机制尚不清楚。诸如自由基增加和延长性禁欲(SA)等因素已在文献中进行了探讨。最近的研究表明,较短的SA可能会对精子参数产生积极影响,尽管结果存在争议。本回顾性分析调查了在不同年龄组接受体外受精(IVF)的精子DNA片段化患者中,SA降低是否对精子DNA片段化(SDF)有可测量的益处。方法对1030例患者进行精子分析和SDF评价。使用广义线性模型(GLM)和分位数回归分析对数据集进行整体研究和分组。首先,我们根据患者年龄(≤38岁和≤38岁)和SA天数(0-3天和4-7天)分为四组;然后,我们检查了两个基于年龄的组(≤38岁和>;38岁)。结果SA是SDF的显著预测因子(p = 0.020),在38岁的患者中观察到更强的影响(p = 0.013)。在一般模型中,年龄和SA之间没有发现显著的相互作用(p = 0.524),但分层分析显示存在阈值效应,其中延长SA对老年人尤其有害。分位数回归进一步证实,SA对基线DNA片段化指数(DFI)较高的患者影响最为显著,提示氧化应激在该亚组中不成比例地积累。结论:我们的研究结果强调了年龄、SA和DFI之间复杂的相互作用,表明长期禁欲对老年男性尤其有害。与以往的研究不同,我们引入了阈值效应,强调SA的影响在所有个体中并不均匀。使用分位数回归可以进行更精确的评估,揭示那些先前存在精子DNA损伤的人更容易受到影响。这些结果表明,世界卫生组织(who)推荐的标准禁欲窗口可能并非对所有患者都是最佳的,特别是在抗逆转录病毒治疗环境中。然而,这些发现的临床意义需要仔细考虑改善DFI和对传统精子参数的潜在影响之间的权衡,提倡更个性化的SA指南来改善生殖结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Andrologia
Andrologia 医学-男科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
292
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Andrologia provides an international forum for original papers on the current clinical, morphological, biochemical, and experimental status of organic male infertility and sexual disorders in men. The articles inform on the whole process of advances in andrology (including the aging male), from fundamental research to therapeutic developments worldwide. First published in 1969 and the first international journal of andrology, it is a well established journal in this expanding area of reproductive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书