{"title":"Networking Characteristics and Innovation Effects of Complementary Technological Cooperation Among Chinese Cities","authors":"Hongji Chen, Pengxin Chen, Gang Zeng","doi":"10.1111/grow.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study employs geospatial analysis and social network analysis to reveal the geographical and relational dimensions of complementary technological cooperation among Chinese cities. Furthermore, using a panel negative binomial regression model, we examine the impact of complementary technological cooperation on urban innovation capacity, and compare it with the effects of non-complementary cooperation. Our findings reveal that: (1) The geographical structure of the complementary technological cooperation network has evolved from a “triangular” configuration—centered on Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen—toward a “rhombus-shaped” structure incorporating Chengdu, with a further tendency toward a “hexagonal” spatial pattern. (2) The social structure of the complementary technological cooperation network exhibits a classic “core–periphery” pattern, with the network's core gradually shifting from a dual-core configuration dominated by Beijing and Shanghai to a single-core, multi-centered structure centered on Beijing. (3) Complementary technological collaboration significantly enhances urban innovation capacity and proves more effective than non-complementary cooperation. This advantage stems from the fact that complementary cooperation not only directly improves innovation output capability but also strengthens the technological relatedness density within cities that non-complementary linkages cannot match.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47545,"journal":{"name":"Growth and Change","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Growth and Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study employs geospatial analysis and social network analysis to reveal the geographical and relational dimensions of complementary technological cooperation among Chinese cities. Furthermore, using a panel negative binomial regression model, we examine the impact of complementary technological cooperation on urban innovation capacity, and compare it with the effects of non-complementary cooperation. Our findings reveal that: (1) The geographical structure of the complementary technological cooperation network has evolved from a “triangular” configuration—centered on Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen—toward a “rhombus-shaped” structure incorporating Chengdu, with a further tendency toward a “hexagonal” spatial pattern. (2) The social structure of the complementary technological cooperation network exhibits a classic “core–periphery” pattern, with the network's core gradually shifting from a dual-core configuration dominated by Beijing and Shanghai to a single-core, multi-centered structure centered on Beijing. (3) Complementary technological collaboration significantly enhances urban innovation capacity and proves more effective than non-complementary cooperation. This advantage stems from the fact that complementary cooperation not only directly improves innovation output capability but also strengthens the technological relatedness density within cities that non-complementary linkages cannot match.
期刊介绍:
Growth and Change is a broadly based forum for scholarly research on all aspects of urban and regional development and policy-making. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal publishes both empirical and theoretical contributions from economics, geography, public finance, urban and regional planning, agricultural economics, public policy, and related fields. These include full-length research articles, Perspectives (contemporary assessments and views on significant issues in urban and regional development) as well as critical book reviews.