Does governance quality moderate the impact of energy efficiency on CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis

IF 3.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Muhammad Khan
{"title":"Does governance quality moderate the impact of energy efficiency on CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis","authors":"Muhammad Khan","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10388-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energy efficiency (EE) is widely recognized as a strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, some empirical studies highlight the presence of <i>rebound effects</i>—where improvements in EE lead to increased overall energy consumption, ultimately resulting in higher CO₂ emissions. This study argues that such pollution-augmenting effects of EE are primarily observed in countries with poor governance quality. In contrast, economies with strong institutional frameworks—characterized by effective policy implementation and well-functioning markets—are better able to translate EE gains into actual reductions in emissions. To test all these hypothesized relationships, we use Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) framework and rely upon a large panel data of 112 economies over the period from 1996 to 2020. Our econometric results, based on dynamic OLS and system-GMM techniques, support the contingency effects of institutional quality in the EE–CO<sub>2</sub> emissions nexus. Furthermore, the empirical findings also support the relevance of the EKC theory for the selected panel economies. The study suggests that the global economy must improve the overall governance quality for reducing energy intensity and experiencing the desirable effects of EE for sustainable economic development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-025-10388-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy efficiency (EE) is widely recognized as a strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, some empirical studies highlight the presence of rebound effects—where improvements in EE lead to increased overall energy consumption, ultimately resulting in higher CO₂ emissions. This study argues that such pollution-augmenting effects of EE are primarily observed in countries with poor governance quality. In contrast, economies with strong institutional frameworks—characterized by effective policy implementation and well-functioning markets—are better able to translate EE gains into actual reductions in emissions. To test all these hypothesized relationships, we use Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) framework and rely upon a large panel data of 112 economies over the period from 1996 to 2020. Our econometric results, based on dynamic OLS and system-GMM techniques, support the contingency effects of institutional quality in the EE–CO2 emissions nexus. Furthermore, the empirical findings also support the relevance of the EKC theory for the selected panel economies. The study suggests that the global economy must improve the overall governance quality for reducing energy intensity and experiencing the desirable effects of EE for sustainable economic development.

Abstract Image

治理质量是否能缓和能源效率对二氧化碳排放的影响?跨国分析
能源效率(EE)被广泛认为是减少温室气体排放的一种策略。然而,一些实证研究强调了反弹效应的存在——能效的提高会导致整体能耗的增加,最终导致二氧化碳排放量的增加。本研究认为,这种污染加剧效应主要出现在治理质量较差的国家。相比之下,具有强大制度框架的经济体——以有效的政策实施和运转良好的市场为特征——更能将节能减排的收益转化为实际的减排。为了检验所有这些假设的关系,我们使用了环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)框架,并依赖于1996年至2020年期间112个经济体的大型面板数据。我们基于动态OLS和系统- gmm技术的计量经济学结果支持制度质量在EE-CO2排放关系中的偶然性效应。此外,实证结果也支持EKC理论对所选面板经济体的相关性。研究表明,全球经济必须提高整体治理质量,以降低能源强度,实现能源效率对经济可持续发展的预期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书