RCKTE: Toward Global Optimal Causal Explanations for Deep Knowledge Tracing

IF 7.4 3区 教育学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Qing Li;Xin Yuan;Jianwen Sun;Xinrui Li;Sijing Chen;Xiaoxuan Shen;Sannyuya Liu
{"title":"RCKTE: Toward Global Optimal Causal Explanations for Deep Knowledge Tracing","authors":"Qing Li;Xin Yuan;Jianwen Sun;Xinrui Li;Sijing Chen;Xiaoxuan Shen;Sannyuya Liu","doi":"10.1109/TLT.2025.3616515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep-learning-based knowledge tracing (DLKT) models have achieved high predictive accuracy, but their opaque “black box” nature limits practical value: educators cannot trace why predictions are made and learners cannot obtain transparent feedback. Existing explainability techniques, which aim to explain why a model makes a particular prediction and provide the evidence for it, predominantly rely on correlational analyses, often yielding unfaithful or suboptimal explanations. To address this, we propose a post hoc reinforcement-learning-based causal deep knowledge tracing explainer (RCKTE). RCKTE operates through a structured workflow: First, it formulates the explanation task as a globally optimal subsequence screening problem, aiming to identify the most causally influential historical interactions from a student’s learning sequence. Then, a reinforcement learning agent, guided by a causal attribution reward and a dual-optimizer scheme, iteratively constructs the optimal subsequences by assessing the causal impact of each interaction. This process results in more faithful and concise explainable subsequences than those produced by correlation-based methods, achieving this within about 1 s to support real-time use. Finally, these explainable subsequences directly support actionable educational applications, including identifying a learner’s weak knowledge for targeted review, constructing personalized knowledge structure graphs for intervention tracking, and deriving group-level knowledge structures to guide curriculum design. Extensive experiments across multiple DLKT models and datasets confirm that RCKTE consistently outperforms existing post hoc methods in both the faithfulness and readability of explanations. By integrating causal attribution with reinforcement learning, RCKTE provides accurate, efficient, and educationally meaningful explanations that enhance the usability of DLKT in real learning environments.","PeriodicalId":49191,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","volume":"18 ","pages":"914-927"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11186224/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep-learning-based knowledge tracing (DLKT) models have achieved high predictive accuracy, but their opaque “black box” nature limits practical value: educators cannot trace why predictions are made and learners cannot obtain transparent feedback. Existing explainability techniques, which aim to explain why a model makes a particular prediction and provide the evidence for it, predominantly rely on correlational analyses, often yielding unfaithful or suboptimal explanations. To address this, we propose a post hoc reinforcement-learning-based causal deep knowledge tracing explainer (RCKTE). RCKTE operates through a structured workflow: First, it formulates the explanation task as a globally optimal subsequence screening problem, aiming to identify the most causally influential historical interactions from a student’s learning sequence. Then, a reinforcement learning agent, guided by a causal attribution reward and a dual-optimizer scheme, iteratively constructs the optimal subsequences by assessing the causal impact of each interaction. This process results in more faithful and concise explainable subsequences than those produced by correlation-based methods, achieving this within about 1 s to support real-time use. Finally, these explainable subsequences directly support actionable educational applications, including identifying a learner’s weak knowledge for targeted review, constructing personalized knowledge structure graphs for intervention tracking, and deriving group-level knowledge structures to guide curriculum design. Extensive experiments across multiple DLKT models and datasets confirm that RCKTE consistently outperforms existing post hoc methods in both the faithfulness and readability of explanations. By integrating causal attribution with reinforcement learning, RCKTE provides accurate, efficient, and educationally meaningful explanations that enhance the usability of DLKT in real learning environments.
面向深度知识追踪的全局最优因果解释
基于深度学习的知识跟踪(DLKT)模型已经取得了很高的预测精度,但其不透明的“黑盒子”性质限制了实用价值:教育者无法追踪做出预测的原因,学习者无法获得透明的反馈。现有的可解释性技术,其目的是解释为什么一个模型做出特定的预测并为其提供证据,主要依赖于相关分析,经常产生不忠实或次优的解释。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个基于事后强化学习的因果深度知识追踪解释器(RCKTE)。RCKTE通过结构化工作流程进行操作:首先,它将解释任务制定为全局最优子序列筛选问题,旨在从学生的学习序列中确定最具因果影响的历史交互。然后,在因果归因奖励和双优化器方案的指导下,强化学习代理通过评估每个交互的因果影响来迭代构建最优子序列。这个过程产生的子序列比基于相关性的方法产生的子序列更忠实、更简洁、可解释,在大约15秒内实现这一点,以支持实时使用。最后,这些可解释的子序列直接支持可操作的教育应用,包括识别学习者的薄弱知识以进行有针对性的复习,构建个性化的知识结构图以进行干预跟踪,以及推导群体层面的知识结构以指导课程设计。跨多个DLKT模型和数据集的广泛实验证实,RCKTE在解释的可靠性和可读性方面始终优于现有的事后方法。通过将因果归因与强化学习相结合,RCKTE提供了准确、高效和有教育意义的解释,从而增强了DLKT在真实学习环境中的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies covers all advances in learning technologies and their applications, including but not limited to the following topics: innovative online learning systems; intelligent tutors; educational games; simulation systems for education and training; collaborative learning tools; learning with mobile devices; wearable devices and interfaces for learning; personalized and adaptive learning systems; tools for formative and summative assessment; tools for learning analytics and educational data mining; ontologies for learning systems; standards and web services that support learning; authoring tools for learning materials; computer support for peer tutoring; learning via computer-mediated inquiry, field, and lab work; social learning techniques; social networks and infrastructures for learning and knowledge sharing; and creation and management of learning objects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书