What helps and hinders recovery from depression? A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of patient-identified recovery factors.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
David Wedema,Johanna H M Hovenkamp-Hermelink,Eliza L Korevaar,Klaas J Wardenaar,Robert A Schoevers
{"title":"What helps and hinders recovery from depression? A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of patient-identified recovery factors.","authors":"David Wedema,Johanna H M Hovenkamp-Hermelink,Eliza L Korevaar,Klaas J Wardenaar,Robert A Schoevers","doi":"10.1159/000548808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nDepression is a common mental disorder with often persistent consequences. Even after adequate treatment, recovery may be far from optimal. To enhance outcomes, we aimed to identify and synthesize factors that depressed adults themselves perceived as facilitating or hindering recovery.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX (last search: February 2, 2025), screened reference lists and consulted experts. Eligible studies used a qualitative design, published in English or Dutch since 1980, and explored recovery factors in adults (≥18 years) with depression.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFrom 4,872 records, 3,394 were screened on title and abstract, and 122 on full text. Twenty-seven articles were eligible and included in the qualitative evidence synthesis. These articles described the experiences with recovery from depression of 939 individuals. Most studies were conducted in Europe (N=11), followed by North America (N=7), Asia (N=6), Australia (N=5), and South America (N=2). Eight overarching themes emerged: (1) Social connections, (2) Reconstructing the self, (3) Autonomy, (4) Professional support, (5) Self-management strategies, (6) Physical health, (7) Instrumental facilitators/barriers, and (8) Temporal dimensions. We present an overview of the relative importance of factors and propose a conceptual model illustrating the interconnectedness of themes.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nRecovery from depression involves a diverse range of interconnected factors. While professional treatment is considered valuable, various other factors also influence individuals' recovery. Our findings underscore the need for an integrated and person-centered approach that combines therapeutic support with personal capacities, self-management strategies, and contextual aspects, emphasizing relational quality, self-reflection, and open dialogue, to optimize subjectively experienced recovery.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"27 1","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548808","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Depression is a common mental disorder with often persistent consequences. Even after adequate treatment, recovery may be far from optimal. To enhance outcomes, we aimed to identify and synthesize factors that depressed adults themselves perceived as facilitating or hindering recovery. METHODS We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX (last search: February 2, 2025), screened reference lists and consulted experts. Eligible studies used a qualitative design, published in English or Dutch since 1980, and explored recovery factors in adults (≥18 years) with depression. RESULTS From 4,872 records, 3,394 were screened on title and abstract, and 122 on full text. Twenty-seven articles were eligible and included in the qualitative evidence synthesis. These articles described the experiences with recovery from depression of 939 individuals. Most studies were conducted in Europe (N=11), followed by North America (N=7), Asia (N=6), Australia (N=5), and South America (N=2). Eight overarching themes emerged: (1) Social connections, (2) Reconstructing the self, (3) Autonomy, (4) Professional support, (5) Self-management strategies, (6) Physical health, (7) Instrumental facilitators/barriers, and (8) Temporal dimensions. We present an overview of the relative importance of factors and propose a conceptual model illustrating the interconnectedness of themes. CONCLUSION Recovery from depression involves a diverse range of interconnected factors. While professional treatment is considered valuable, various other factors also influence individuals' recovery. Our findings underscore the need for an integrated and person-centered approach that combines therapeutic support with personal capacities, self-management strategies, and contextual aspects, emphasizing relational quality, self-reflection, and open dialogue, to optimize subjectively experienced recovery.
是什么帮助和阻碍了抑郁症的恢复?对患者确定的恢复因素进行系统回顾和定性证据合成。
抑郁症是一种常见的精神障碍,其后果往往是持续性的。即使经过适当的治疗,恢复也可能远非最佳。为了提高结果,我们旨在识别和综合抑郁症成年人自己认为促进或阻碍康复的因素。方法检索PubMed、PsycINFO、SocINDEX(最后检索日期:2025年2月2日),筛选参考文献并咨询专家。符合条件的研究采用定性设计,自1980年以来以英语或荷兰语发表,探讨成人(≥18岁)抑郁症的恢复因素。结果4872篇文献中,检索标题和摘要3394篇,检索全文122篇。27篇文章符合条件,纳入定性证据合成。这些文章描述了939个人从抑郁症中恢复的经历。大多数研究在欧洲进行(N=11),其次是北美(N=7)、亚洲(N=6)、澳大利亚(N=5)和南美(N=2)。八个主要主题出现了:(1)社会联系,(2)自我重建,(3)自主性,(4)专业支持,(5)自我管理策略,(6)身体健康,(7)工具性促进/障碍,(8)时间维度。我们提出了因素的相对重要性的概述,并提出了一个概念模型,说明主题的相互联系。结论抑郁症的康复涉及多种相互关联的因素。虽然专业治疗被认为是有价值的,但各种其他因素也会影响个人的康复。我们的研究结果强调需要一种综合的、以人为本的方法,将治疗支持与个人能力、自我管理策略和环境因素结合起来,强调关系质量、自我反思和公开对话,以优化主观体验的康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
29.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field. As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers. The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书