Clinically Relevant Gait Biomechanics Improvements After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Journal of Applied Biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-10-29 Print Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1123/jab.2024-0139
Annemarie F Laudanski, Jereme B Outerleys, Renata Kirkwood, Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey, Kathryn L Young-Shand, C Glen Richardson, Michael J Dunbar, Janie L Astephen Wilson
{"title":"Clinically Relevant Gait Biomechanics Improvements After Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Annemarie F Laudanski, Jereme B Outerleys, Renata Kirkwood, Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey, Kathryn L Young-Shand, C Glen Richardson, Michael J Dunbar, Janie L Astephen Wilson","doi":"10.1123/jab.2024-0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Improved joint function is a primary goal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet persistent postoperative deficits in joint biomechanics are common, and the link between these and other clinical outcomes is poorly understood. Evidence on clinically meaningful gait outcomes after arthroplasty is limited, hindering their uptake in clinical trials and technological innovations in arthroplasty. This paper examined the associations between gait outcomes and satisfaction after TKA and defined minimal detectable and clinically meaningful thresholds for gait outcome changes. Thirty-one patients underwent instrumented gait analysis immediately before and 1 year after TKA and were categorized as high (>90) and lower (≤90) satisfaction with their joint replacement after surgery. Sixteen (51.6%) patients self-reported high satisfaction, and 15 (48.4%) reported lower satisfaction. There were no pre-TKA gait differences between the groups, but higher satisfaction postarthroplasty was associated with more a biphasic pattern improvement of the knee flexion/extension moment during stance from presurgery to postsurgery (r = .59, P = .001). Most patients, however, did not achieve minimal detectable or meaningful clinically important improvements in knee biomechanics from pre-TKA to post-TKA. The established thresholds for meaningful improvement in biomechanical variables may be used in future studies to relate measures of patient satisfaction to objective gait outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"571-582"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2024-0139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improved joint function is a primary goal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet persistent postoperative deficits in joint biomechanics are common, and the link between these and other clinical outcomes is poorly understood. Evidence on clinically meaningful gait outcomes after arthroplasty is limited, hindering their uptake in clinical trials and technological innovations in arthroplasty. This paper examined the associations between gait outcomes and satisfaction after TKA and defined minimal detectable and clinically meaningful thresholds for gait outcome changes. Thirty-one patients underwent instrumented gait analysis immediately before and 1 year after TKA and were categorized as high (>90) and lower (≤90) satisfaction with their joint replacement after surgery. Sixteen (51.6%) patients self-reported high satisfaction, and 15 (48.4%) reported lower satisfaction. There were no pre-TKA gait differences between the groups, but higher satisfaction postarthroplasty was associated with more a biphasic pattern improvement of the knee flexion/extension moment during stance from presurgery to postsurgery (r = .59, P = .001). Most patients, however, did not achieve minimal detectable or meaningful clinically important improvements in knee biomechanics from pre-TKA to post-TKA. The established thresholds for meaningful improvement in biomechanical variables may be used in future studies to relate measures of patient satisfaction to objective gait outcomes.

全膝关节置换术后临床相关步态生物力学改善。
改善关节功能是全膝关节置换术(TKA)的主要目标,然而术后持续的关节生物力学缺陷是常见的,并且这些与其他临床结果之间的联系尚不清楚。关节置换术后临床有意义的步态结果的证据有限,阻碍了它们在临床试验和关节置换术技术创新中的应用。本文研究了TKA后步态结果与满意度之间的关系,并定义了步态结果变化的最小可检测阈值和临床意义阈值。31例患者在TKA术前和术后1年进行了仪器步态分析,并被分为高满意度(bbb90)和低满意度(≤90)。高满意度16例(51.6%),低满意度15例(48.4%)。两组之间在tka前步态没有差异,但髋关节置换术后更高的满意度与术前至术后站立时膝关节屈伸力矩的双相模式改善相关(r = 0.59, P = 0.001)。然而,从tka前到tka后,大多数患者在膝关节生物力学方面没有达到最小可检测到的或有意义的临床重要改善。建立的生物力学变量有意义改善的阈值可以在未来的研究中用于将患者满意度与客观步态结果联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Journal of Applied Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics (JAB) is to disseminate the highest quality peer-reviewed studies that utilize biomechanical strategies to advance the study of human movement. Areas of interest include clinical biomechanics, gait and posture mechanics, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular biomechanics, sport mechanics, and biomechanical modeling. Studies of sport performance that explicitly generalize to broader activities, contribute substantially to fundamental understanding of human motion, or are in a sport that enjoys wide participation, are welcome. Also within the scope of JAB are studies using biomechanical strategies to investigate the structure, control, function, and state (health and disease) of animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书