The hominin fossil record of the Omo-Turkana Basin

IF 3.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Journal of Human Evolution Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2025.103731
François Marchal , Denné Reed , Sandrine Prat
{"title":"The hominin fossil record of the Omo-Turkana Basin","authors":"François Marchal ,&nbsp;Denné Reed ,&nbsp;Sandrine Prat","doi":"10.1016/j.jhevol.2025.103731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Omo-Turkana Basin is one of three major regions for the study of hominin evolution in Africa. It has yielded a rich hominin fossil record of 1231 specimens, around a third of the record for the whole of Africa for the period from the Messinian through the Calabrian. Here, we consider the fossil hominin record of the Omo-Turkana Basin as an object of study in its own right and show the contribution that an analysis of such an exhaustive record can make. The data come from 117 publications allowing the most complete, accurate, and up-to-date synthesis of this record. Our analysis provides a quantitative perspective on the biases affecting this record, such as skeletal element abundance representation, chronostratigraphic distribution, and difficulties in taxonomic assignment. It also provides historical perspective, illustrating the major contribution made by the Omo-Turkana hominin fossil record to our knowledge of human evolution. We provide a synthetic overview of the taxa represented and discuss the chronological distribution of taxonomic groups in the basin including the relative abundance of <em>Paranthropus</em> and <em>Homo</em> (2/3 and 1/3, respectively) during their long period of coexistence. Integrating the data makes it possible to address difficult questions that have been underinvestigated until now. For example, contrary to the prevailing view, the genus <em>Homo</em> is well represented in the Omo-Turkana Basin between 2.7 and 2 Ma. Additionally, we show that the hominin fossil record of the Upper Burgi and KBS Members is atypical, both in terms of skeletal element abundance and taxonomy. Neither paleoenvironments nor taphonomic or collecting biases can fully explain this anomaly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Evolution","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 103731"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248425000843","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Omo-Turkana Basin is one of three major regions for the study of hominin evolution in Africa. It has yielded a rich hominin fossil record of 1231 specimens, around a third of the record for the whole of Africa for the period from the Messinian through the Calabrian. Here, we consider the fossil hominin record of the Omo-Turkana Basin as an object of study in its own right and show the contribution that an analysis of such an exhaustive record can make. The data come from 117 publications allowing the most complete, accurate, and up-to-date synthesis of this record. Our analysis provides a quantitative perspective on the biases affecting this record, such as skeletal element abundance representation, chronostratigraphic distribution, and difficulties in taxonomic assignment. It also provides historical perspective, illustrating the major contribution made by the Omo-Turkana hominin fossil record to our knowledge of human evolution. We provide a synthetic overview of the taxa represented and discuss the chronological distribution of taxonomic groups in the basin including the relative abundance of Paranthropus and Homo (2/3 and 1/3, respectively) during their long period of coexistence. Integrating the data makes it possible to address difficult questions that have been underinvestigated until now. For example, contrary to the prevailing view, the genus Homo is well represented in the Omo-Turkana Basin between 2.7 and 2 Ma. Additionally, we show that the hominin fossil record of the Upper Burgi and KBS Members is atypical, both in terms of skeletal element abundance and taxonomy. Neither paleoenvironments nor taphonomic or collecting biases can fully explain this anomaly.
奥莫-图尔卡纳盆地的古人类化石记录。
奥莫-图尔卡纳盆地是非洲人类进化研究的三个主要地区之一。它已经产生了1231个丰富的古人类化石记录,大约是整个非洲从墨西尼亚到卡拉布里亚时期记录的三分之一。在这里,我们认为奥莫-图尔卡纳盆地的古人类化石记录本身就是一个研究对象,并展示了对这种详尽记录的分析所能做出的贡献。这些数据来自117份出版物,可以对这一记录进行最完整、最准确和最新的综合。我们的分析为影响这一记录的偏差提供了定量的视角,如骨骼元素丰度表征、年代地层分布和分类分配的困难。它还提供了历史视角,说明了Omo-Turkana古人类化石记录对我们人类进化知识的主要贡献。本文对所代表的分类群进行了综合综述,并讨论了该盆地分类群的年代学分布,包括类人猿和人属在其长期共存期间的相对丰度(分别为2/3和1/3)。整合这些数据使解决迄今为止尚未充分研究的难题成为可能。例如,与主流观点相反,人属在2.7 - 2 Ma之间的Omo-Turkana盆地中得到了很好的代表。此外,我们还表明,上Burgi和KBS成员的古人类化石记录在骨骼元素丰度和分类方面都是非典型的。无论是古环境还是地貌学或收集偏见都不能完全解释这种异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Human Evolution
Journal of Human Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
104
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Evolution concentrates on publishing the highest quality papers covering all aspects of human evolution. The central focus is aimed jointly at paleoanthropological work, covering human and primate fossils, and at comparative studies of living species, including both morphological and molecular evidence. These include descriptions of new discoveries, interpretative analyses of new and previously described material, and assessments of the phylogeny and paleobiology of primate species. Submissions should address issues and questions of broad interest in paleoanthropology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书