Chamindika L Siriwardana, Ashleigh S Carlton, Thalia Lizeth Moncayo, Elizabeth A O'Bier, Laura E Bartley
{"title":"An Introduction to Network Analysis in Plant Biology.","authors":"Chamindika L Siriwardana, Ashleigh S Carlton, Thalia Lizeth Moncayo, Elizabeth A O'Bier, Laura E Bartley","doi":"10.1002/pld3.70114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This beginner's guide is intended for plant biologists new to network analysis. Here, we introduce key concepts and resources for researchers interested in incorporating network analysis into research, either as a stand-alone component for generating hypotheses or as a framework for examining and visualizing experimental results. Network analysis provides a powerful tool to predict gene functions. Advances in and reduced costs for systems biology techniques, such as genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, have generated abundant omics data for plants; however, the functional annotation of plant genes lags. Therefore, predictions from network analysis can be a starting point to annotate genes and ultimately elucidate genotype-phenotype relationships. In this paper, we introduce networks and compare network-building resources available for plant biologists, including databases and software for network analysis. We then compare four databases available for plant biologists in more detail: AraNet, GeneMANIA, ATTED-II, and STRING. AraNet and GeneMANIA are functional association networks, ATTED-II is a gene coexpression database, and STRING is a protein-protein interaction database. AraNet and ATTED-II are plant-specific databases that can analyze multiple plant species, whereas GeneMANIA builds networks for <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> and nonplant species and STRING for multiple species. Finally, we compare the performance of the four databases in predicting known and probable gene functions of the <i>A. thaliana</i> Nuclear Factor-Y (NF-Y) genes. We conclude that plant biologists have an invaluable resource in these databases and discuss how users can decide which type of database to use depending on their research question.</p>","PeriodicalId":20230,"journal":{"name":"Plant Direct","volume":"9 10","pages":"e70114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12560016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Direct","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.70114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This beginner's guide is intended for plant biologists new to network analysis. Here, we introduce key concepts and resources for researchers interested in incorporating network analysis into research, either as a stand-alone component for generating hypotheses or as a framework for examining and visualizing experimental results. Network analysis provides a powerful tool to predict gene functions. Advances in and reduced costs for systems biology techniques, such as genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, have generated abundant omics data for plants; however, the functional annotation of plant genes lags. Therefore, predictions from network analysis can be a starting point to annotate genes and ultimately elucidate genotype-phenotype relationships. In this paper, we introduce networks and compare network-building resources available for plant biologists, including databases and software for network analysis. We then compare four databases available for plant biologists in more detail: AraNet, GeneMANIA, ATTED-II, and STRING. AraNet and GeneMANIA are functional association networks, ATTED-II is a gene coexpression database, and STRING is a protein-protein interaction database. AraNet and ATTED-II are plant-specific databases that can analyze multiple plant species, whereas GeneMANIA builds networks for Arabidopsis thaliana and nonplant species and STRING for multiple species. Finally, we compare the performance of the four databases in predicting known and probable gene functions of the A. thaliana Nuclear Factor-Y (NF-Y) genes. We conclude that plant biologists have an invaluable resource in these databases and discuss how users can decide which type of database to use depending on their research question.
这个初学者的指南是为植物生物学家新的网络分析。在这里,我们为有兴趣将网络分析纳入研究的研究人员介绍了关键概念和资源,无论是作为产生假设的独立组件,还是作为检查和可视化实验结果的框架。网络分析是预测基因功能的有力工具。基因组学、转录组学和蛋白质组学等系统生物学技术的进步和成本的降低,产生了丰富的植物组学数据;然而,植物基因的功能注释却滞后。因此,来自网络分析的预测可以作为注释基因并最终阐明基因型-表型关系的起点。在本文中,我们介绍了网络,并比较了植物生物学家可用的网络建设资源,包括数据库和网络分析软件。然后,我们更详细地比较了四个可供植物生物学家使用的数据库:AraNet、GeneMANIA、ATTED-II和STRING。AraNet和GeneMANIA是功能关联网络,ATTED-II是基因共表达数据库,STRING是蛋白-蛋白相互作用数据库。AraNet和ATTED-II是植物特异性数据库,可以分析多种植物物种,而GeneMANIA建立了拟南芥和非植物物种的网络,STRING建立了多种物种的网络。最后,我们比较了四种数据库在预测拟南芥核因子- y (NF-Y)基因已知和可能基因功能方面的性能。我们得出结论,植物生物学家在这些数据库中拥有宝贵的资源,并讨论了用户如何根据他们的研究问题决定使用哪种类型的数据库。
期刊介绍:
Plant Direct is a monthly, sound science journal for the plant sciences that gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting work dealing with a variety of subjects. Topics include but are not limited to genetics, biochemistry, development, cell biology, biotic stress, abiotic stress, genomics, phenomics, bioinformatics, physiology, molecular biology, and evolution. A collaborative journal launched by the American Society of Plant Biologists, the Society for Experimental Biology and Wiley, Plant Direct publishes papers submitted directly to the journal as well as those referred from a select group of the societies’ journals.