Bloqueo ecoguiado del canal del aductor: ¿puede el abordaje del eje corto oblicuo facilitar la inserción del catéter perineural? Estudio controlado aleatorizado
M.A.R. Nasr, A. Ahmed, N. Ahmed, S. Soaida, M. Waheeb
{"title":"Bloqueo ecoguiado del canal del aductor: ¿puede el abordaje del eje corto oblicuo facilitar la inserción del catéter perineural? Estudio controlado aleatorizado","authors":"M.A.R. Nasr, A. Ahmed, N. Ahmed, S. Soaida, M. Waheeb","doi":"10.1016/j.redar.2025.501901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The transverse short-axis in-plane is the standard approach for ultrasound-guided perineural catheter insertion and threading during adductor canal block (BCA). We hypothesized that the oblique short-axis in-plane approach could simplify and speed up catheter insertion and threading by eliminating some technical difficulties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 50 patients aged ≥<!--> <!-->18<!--> <!-->years, ASA<!--> <!-->I and<!--> <!-->II, who were scheduled for unilateral knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia. We planned to use BCA with a perineural catheter for postoperative analgesia. After administering spinal anesthesia, the patients were randomly assigned to the oblique (oblique short-axis in-plane approach) or transverse (standard short-axis in-plane approach) groups. The primary endpoint was catheter insertion time. The secondary endpoints were catheter threading difficulty, and incidence of vascular puncture and catheter migration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The catheter insertion time was significantly shorter in the oblique group vs the transverse group (113.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->49.2<!--> <!-->s vs 185.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->46.7<!--> <!-->s, respectively, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001). Catheter threading was significantly easier in the oblique group, as shown by the lower threading difficulty score compared to the transverse group. Both groups were comparable in terms of the incidence of vascular puncture and catheter migration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients who underwent knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia, the oblique short-axis in-plane approach for catheter insertion during BCA was faster and less technically challenging than the standard transverse short-axis in-plane approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46479,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","volume":"72 9","pages":"Article 501901"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034935625001768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The transverse short-axis in-plane is the standard approach for ultrasound-guided perineural catheter insertion and threading during adductor canal block (BCA). We hypothesized that the oblique short-axis in-plane approach could simplify and speed up catheter insertion and threading by eliminating some technical difficulties.
Methods
We included 50 patients aged ≥ 18 years, ASA I and II, who were scheduled for unilateral knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia. We planned to use BCA with a perineural catheter for postoperative analgesia. After administering spinal anesthesia, the patients were randomly assigned to the oblique (oblique short-axis in-plane approach) or transverse (standard short-axis in-plane approach) groups. The primary endpoint was catheter insertion time. The secondary endpoints were catheter threading difficulty, and incidence of vascular puncture and catheter migration.
Results
The catheter insertion time was significantly shorter in the oblique group vs the transverse group (113.8 ± 49.2 s vs 185.8 ± 46.7 s, respectively, P < .001). Catheter threading was significantly easier in the oblique group, as shown by the lower threading difficulty score compared to the transverse group. Both groups were comparable in terms of the incidence of vascular puncture and catheter migration.
Conclusion
In patients who underwent knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia, the oblique short-axis in-plane approach for catheter insertion during BCA was faster and less technically challenging than the standard transverse short-axis in-plane approach.
横向短轴平面内入路是超声引导下内收管阻滞(BCA)术中围神经导管插入和穿线的标准入路。我们假设斜短轴平面内入路可以通过消除一些技术困难来简化和加快导管的插入和穿线。方法纳入50例年龄≥18岁,ASA I和II级的患者,在脊髓麻醉下行单侧膝关节镜检查。我们计划使用BCA配合神经周导管进行术后镇痛。给予脊髓麻醉后,将患者随机分为斜(斜短轴平面内入路)组和横(标准短轴平面内入路)组。主要终点为导管插入时间。次要终点是导管穿线困难、血管穿刺和导管移位的发生率。结果斜置组置管时间明显短于横置组(113.8±49.2 s vs 185.8±46.7 s, P < 001)。斜位组的导管穿线难度评分明显低于横位组。两组在血管穿刺和导管移位的发生率方面具有可比性。结论在脊柱麻醉下行膝关节镜患者行BCA时,斜短轴平面内入路比标准的横向短轴平面内入路更快,技术难度更小。