Chun Sing Lam , Rong Hua , Lung Wai Au-Doung , Yu Kang Wu , Ho Kee Koon , Keary Rui Zhou , Herbert Ho-Fung Loong , Vincent Chi-Ho Chung , Richard Lee , Alexandre Chan , Yin Ting Cheung
{"title":"Potential supplement-drug interactions and bleeding in patients with cancer: A UK Biobank study","authors":"Chun Sing Lam , Rong Hua , Lung Wai Au-Doung , Yu Kang Wu , Ho Kee Koon , Keary Rui Zhou , Herbert Ho-Fung Loong , Vincent Chi-Ho Chung , Richard Lee , Alexandre Chan , Yin Ting Cheung","doi":"10.1016/j.joim.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Interactions between supplements and drugs may potentially increase the risk of bleeding in patients with cancer. However, studies on drug interactions and bleeding risk in cancer patients in a real-world setting are limited. This study investigates supplement-drug interactions associated with bleeding risk using data from the UK Biobank database (<span><span>https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants included in this study had a cancer diagnosis and had completed supplement-use assessment after their diagnosis. Potential supplement-drug interactions associated with bleeding were identified using four tertiary databases. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between potential clinical predictors and the use of supplement-drug pairs with interactions that potentially increase the bleeding risk. Exploratory analysis utilized log-binomial regression to examine the association between potentially interacting supplement-drug pairs and the incidence rates of five major bleeding outcomes (gastrointestinal hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, hematuria, hemorrhage from respiratory passages, and postmenopausal bleeding). All analyses were adjusted for relevant factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study analyzed data from 30,239 participants (mean age = 60.0 years; 61.9% female). Over half (<em>n</em> = 17,698, 58.5%) of the participants reported using supplements after their cancer diagnosis. Among those using both supplements and drugs, one-third (<em>n</em> = 4970/14,308, 34.7%) were taking potentially interacting pairs that increase bleeding risk. Younger age at cancer diagnosis, longer time since diagnosis, specific cancer types, and comorbidities were associated with the use of these interacting pairs. Exploratory analyses found no significant associations between the use of potentially interacting supplement-drug pairs and the incidence of major bleeding events (all <em>P</em> > 0.05), although the risk of minor bleeding cannot be ruled out.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Approximately one-third of cancer patients who used supplements and drugs had a potential risk for bleeding due to supplement-drug interactions, suggesting the need to raise awareness about bleeding risks among patients and healthcare providers. Further pharmacovigilance monitoring and prospective cohort studies are needed to better understand the clinical impact of specific interactions.</div><div><br>Please cite this article as: Lam CS, Hua R, Au-Doung LW, Wu YK, Koon HK, Zhou KR, Loong HHF, Chung VCH, Lee R, Chan A, Cheung AT. Potential supplement-drug interactions and bleeding in patients with cancer: A UK Biobank study. <em>J Integr Med</em>. 2026; 24(1):90–97.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim","volume":"24 1","pages":"Pages 90-97"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095496425001633","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Interactions between supplements and drugs may potentially increase the risk of bleeding in patients with cancer. However, studies on drug interactions and bleeding risk in cancer patients in a real-world setting are limited. This study investigates supplement-drug interactions associated with bleeding risk using data from the UK Biobank database (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk).
Methods
Participants included in this study had a cancer diagnosis and had completed supplement-use assessment after their diagnosis. Potential supplement-drug interactions associated with bleeding were identified using four tertiary databases. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between potential clinical predictors and the use of supplement-drug pairs with interactions that potentially increase the bleeding risk. Exploratory analysis utilized log-binomial regression to examine the association between potentially interacting supplement-drug pairs and the incidence rates of five major bleeding outcomes (gastrointestinal hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, hematuria, hemorrhage from respiratory passages, and postmenopausal bleeding). All analyses were adjusted for relevant factors.
Results
This study analyzed data from 30,239 participants (mean age = 60.0 years; 61.9% female). Over half (n = 17,698, 58.5%) of the participants reported using supplements after their cancer diagnosis. Among those using both supplements and drugs, one-third (n = 4970/14,308, 34.7%) were taking potentially interacting pairs that increase bleeding risk. Younger age at cancer diagnosis, longer time since diagnosis, specific cancer types, and comorbidities were associated with the use of these interacting pairs. Exploratory analyses found no significant associations between the use of potentially interacting supplement-drug pairs and the incidence of major bleeding events (all P > 0.05), although the risk of minor bleeding cannot be ruled out.
Conclusion
Approximately one-third of cancer patients who used supplements and drugs had a potential risk for bleeding due to supplement-drug interactions, suggesting the need to raise awareness about bleeding risks among patients and healthcare providers. Further pharmacovigilance monitoring and prospective cohort studies are needed to better understand the clinical impact of specific interactions.
Please cite this article as: Lam CS, Hua R, Au-Doung LW, Wu YK, Koon HK, Zhou KR, Loong HHF, Chung VCH, Lee R, Chan A, Cheung AT. Potential supplement-drug interactions and bleeding in patients with cancer: A UK Biobank study. J Integr Med. 2026; 24(1):90–97.
期刊介绍:
The predecessor of JIM is the Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine (Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao). With this new, English-language publication, we are committed to make JIM an international platform for publishing high-quality papers on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and an open forum in which the different professions and international scholarly communities can exchange views, share research and their clinical experience, discuss CAM education, and confer about issues and problems in our various disciplines and in CAM as a whole in order to promote integrative medicine.
JIM is indexed/abstracted in: MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, Embase, Chemical Abstracts (CA), CAB Abstracts, EBSCO, WPRIM, JST China, Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI).
JIM Editorial Office uses ThomsonReuters ScholarOne Manuscripts as submitting and review system (submission link: http://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/jcim-en).
JIM is published bimonthly. Manuscripts submitted to JIM should be written in English. Article types include but are not limited to randomized controlled and pragmatic trials, translational and patient-centered effectiveness outcome studies, case series and reports, clinical trial protocols, preclinical and basic science studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, papers on methodology and CAM history or education, conference proceedings, editorials, commentaries, short communications, book reviews, and letters to the editor.
Our purpose is to publish a prestigious international journal for studies in integrative medicine. To achieve this aim, we seek to publish high-quality papers on any aspects of integrative medicine, such as acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine, Ayurveda medicine, herbal medicine, homeopathy, nutrition, chiropractic, mind-body medicine, taichi, qigong, meditation, and any other modalities of CAM; our commitment to international scope ensures that research and progress from all regions of the world are widely covered. These ensure that articles published in JIM have the maximum exposure to the international scholarly community.
JIM can help its authors let their papers reach the widest possible range of readers, and let all those who share an interest in their research field be concerned with their study.