Comparative evaluation of orthodontic treatment needs index and the dental aesthetic index to assess the need for orthodontic treatment from the participants' perspective: A cross-sectional study.

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2025-09-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_24_25
Esraa S Jasim, Zainab M Kadhom, Dheaa Al-Groosh
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of orthodontic treatment needs index and the dental aesthetic index to assess the need for orthodontic treatment from the participants' perspective: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Esraa S Jasim, Zainab M Kadhom, Dheaa Al-Groosh","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_24_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the Dental Health Component (DHC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) with the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) in evaluating orthodontic treatment needs among adolescents. In addition, it sought to assess the concordance between adolescents' self-perception of the Aesthetic Component of the IOTN (AC-IOTN) with the evaluations made by orthodontic professionals.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A two-stage stratified cluster sampling method was used to select 248 high school students aged 11-14. Clinical examinations were conducted by specialist orthodontists. DAI, AC-IOTN, and DHC-IOTN were measured based on the students' occlusal morphology. Students also made self-assessments using the AC-IOTN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of DHC-IOTN, 9.7% of students had severe cases that definitely needed treatment. The DAI assessment identified 5.2% with severe malocclusion and 4% with handicapping malocclusion. Using the AC-IOTN, the students assessed 4.8% of cases as severe, compared with 8.5% according to orthodontists. A comparative analysis of the results of the modified DAI and the DHC-IOTN, using Chi-squared test demonstrated highly significant differences between the two indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights the need for improved orthodontic assessment methods, preventive care, and enhanced dental education to improve students' oral health behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"14 ","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12558379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_24_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the Dental Health Component (DHC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) with the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) in evaluating orthodontic treatment needs among adolescents. In addition, it sought to assess the concordance between adolescents' self-perception of the Aesthetic Component of the IOTN (AC-IOTN) with the evaluations made by orthodontic professionals.

Material and methods: A two-stage stratified cluster sampling method was used to select 248 high school students aged 11-14. Clinical examinations were conducted by specialist orthodontists. DAI, AC-IOTN, and DHC-IOTN were measured based on the students' occlusal morphology. Students also made self-assessments using the AC-IOTN.

Results: In terms of DHC-IOTN, 9.7% of students had severe cases that definitely needed treatment. The DAI assessment identified 5.2% with severe malocclusion and 4% with handicapping malocclusion. Using the AC-IOTN, the students assessed 4.8% of cases as severe, compared with 8.5% according to orthodontists. A comparative analysis of the results of the modified DAI and the DHC-IOTN, using Chi-squared test demonstrated highly significant differences between the two indices.

Conclusions: The study highlights the need for improved orthodontic assessment methods, preventive care, and enhanced dental education to improve students' oral health behaviors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

正畸治疗需求指数与口腔美学指数的对比评价:一项从被试角度评价正畸治疗需求的横断面研究
目的:比较正畸治疗需求指数(IOTN)的牙齿健康成分(DHC)与牙齿美观指数(DAI)在评估青少年正畸治疗需求中的差异。此外,本研究还试图评估青少年对IOTN美学成分(AC-IOTN)的自我知觉与正畸专业人员的评价之间的一致性。资料与方法:采用两阶段分层整群抽样方法,对248名11 ~ 14岁的高中生进行抽样调查。临床检查由专科正畸医生进行。根据学生的咬合形态测定DAI、AC-IOTN、DHC-IOTN。学生们还使用AC-IOTN进行了自我评估。结果:在DHC-IOTN方面,9.7%的学生有明确需要治疗的重症病例。DAI评估发现5.2%为严重错颌,4%为残障性错颌。使用AC-IOTN,学生将4.8%的病例评估为严重,而正畸医生的评估为8.5%。修正后的DAI与DHC-IOTN结果进行卡方检验的比较分析表明,两者之间存在高度显著性差异。结论:需要改进正畸评估方法,加强预防保健,加强口腔教育,以改善学生的口腔健康行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书