Promoting Inclusive Recruitment Within Children's Social Care Research Trials: Lessons From the Reflective Fostering Study's InCLUDE Project

Shayma Izzidien, Rachael Stemp, Sabbir Ahmed, Sakab Akram, Rebecca-Leigh Flanagan, Karen Irvine, Shivani Sharma, Nick Midgley
{"title":"Promoting Inclusive Recruitment Within Children's Social Care Research Trials: Lessons From the Reflective Fostering Study's InCLUDE Project","authors":"Shayma Izzidien,&nbsp;Rachael Stemp,&nbsp;Sabbir Ahmed,&nbsp;Sakab Akram,&nbsp;Rebecca-Leigh Flanagan,&nbsp;Karen Irvine,&nbsp;Shivani Sharma,&nbsp;Nick Midgley","doi":"10.1002/dvr2.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is widely acknowledged that those participating in clinical trials generally do not represent the intended beneficiaries of that research. This pattern is mirrored in trials within children's social care settings, where underserved communities are often not adequately represented. This paper shares learning from the Reflective Fostering Study, a clinical trial that evaluated the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Reflective Fostering Programme, a support programme for foster and kinship carers. The trial included a distinct workstream, the ‘InCLUDE (Increasing Collaboration and Learning with Underserved communities for Diversity and Equity.) project’, aiming to better understand the barriers preventing specific underserved groups (male carers, South Asian and kinship carers) from taking part in the study, as well as identifying facilitators for their active and meaningful involvement. Learning was used to iteratively modify the recruitment processes within the trial, with the aim of improving representation of groups initially underrepresented. Over the course of the trial, representation of specific underserved groups improved, as evidenced by the analysis of study data from the later phases of the study and compared to national data. Drawing on all the learning from InCLUDE, the paper presents broader recommendations for enhancing inclusion and representation in future children's social care research trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":100379,"journal":{"name":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dvr2.70038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dvr2.70038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that those participating in clinical trials generally do not represent the intended beneficiaries of that research. This pattern is mirrored in trials within children's social care settings, where underserved communities are often not adequately represented. This paper shares learning from the Reflective Fostering Study, a clinical trial that evaluated the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Reflective Fostering Programme, a support programme for foster and kinship carers. The trial included a distinct workstream, the ‘InCLUDE (Increasing Collaboration and Learning with Underserved communities for Diversity and Equity.) project’, aiming to better understand the barriers preventing specific underserved groups (male carers, South Asian and kinship carers) from taking part in the study, as well as identifying facilitators for their active and meaningful involvement. Learning was used to iteratively modify the recruitment processes within the trial, with the aim of improving representation of groups initially underrepresented. Over the course of the trial, representation of specific underserved groups improved, as evidenced by the analysis of study data from the later phases of the study and compared to national data. Drawing on all the learning from InCLUDE, the paper presents broader recommendations for enhancing inclusion and representation in future children's social care research trials.

在儿童社会关怀研究试验中促进包容性招募:来自反思性培养研究的包容性项目的启示
人们普遍认为,参加临床试验的人通常不代表该研究的预期受益者。这种模式在儿童社会护理机构的试验中得到了反映,在这些机构中,服务不足的社区往往没有得到充分的代表。本文分享了反思性抚养研究的经验,这是一项临床试验,评估了反思性抚养计划的临床和成本效益,这是一项为寄养和亲属照顾者提供支持的计划。该试验包括一个独特的工作流程,“包括(增加与服务不足社区的合作和学习,以促进多样性和公平性)项目”,旨在更好地了解阻碍特定服务不足群体(男性护理人员、南亚和亲属护理人员)参与研究的障碍,并确定他们积极和有意义参与的促进者。学习被用来反复修改试验中的招募过程,目的是提高最初未被充分代表的群体的代表性。在试验过程中,特定服务不足群体的代表性得到了改善,研究后期的研究数据分析以及与国家数据的比较证明了这一点。根据《包括》的所有经验教训,本文提出了在未来儿童社会关怀研究试验中加强包容性和代表性的更广泛建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书