Making safe spaces safer: Political activism, therapeutic culture, and the evolution of feminist consciousness-raising, 1968-1988.

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q1 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
History of Psychology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-27 DOI:10.1037/hop0000283
Ulrich Koch
{"title":"Making safe spaces safer: Political activism, therapeutic culture, and the evolution of feminist consciousness-raising, 1968-1988.","authors":"Ulrich Koch","doi":"10.1037/hop0000283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores one of the origins of the notion of \"safe space.\" Its aims are twofold: First, by using the early history of feminist consciousness-raising (CR) as a lens, it draws out consequential shifts in the methods and rationales for creating and maintaining psychologically safe group environments. Second, by doing so, the essay aims to complicate contemporary debates surrounding the use of safe spaces. The rules we today associate with the establishment of such environments (demanding confidentiality, suspension of judgment) were initially prompted by egalitarian concerns about power imbalances within CR groups. As the method circulated beyond circles of radical feminists in the early 1970s, however, its aims and targets changed, letting it converge with self-help and encounter groups. The reform-oriented National Organization for Women both aided in the wider diffusion of CR while also constricting the practice. As the epistemic aims of CR became deemphasized in the process, such groups now more often took on emotional-supportive functions. Safety concerns, in turn, shifted toward protecting participants from the potential psychological harms of group experiences. These psychological safety measures were subsequently adopted by psychologists and educators, whereas in activist circles, in the 1980s, safe spaces, similarly, became places of refuge from external oppression and internal strife. Making safe spaces safer in this way represented a fundamental shift in how psychological safety within group environments was conceived. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"312-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores one of the origins of the notion of "safe space." Its aims are twofold: First, by using the early history of feminist consciousness-raising (CR) as a lens, it draws out consequential shifts in the methods and rationales for creating and maintaining psychologically safe group environments. Second, by doing so, the essay aims to complicate contemporary debates surrounding the use of safe spaces. The rules we today associate with the establishment of such environments (demanding confidentiality, suspension of judgment) were initially prompted by egalitarian concerns about power imbalances within CR groups. As the method circulated beyond circles of radical feminists in the early 1970s, however, its aims and targets changed, letting it converge with self-help and encounter groups. The reform-oriented National Organization for Women both aided in the wider diffusion of CR while also constricting the practice. As the epistemic aims of CR became deemphasized in the process, such groups now more often took on emotional-supportive functions. Safety concerns, in turn, shifted toward protecting participants from the potential psychological harms of group experiences. These psychological safety measures were subsequently adopted by psychologists and educators, whereas in activist circles, in the 1980s, safe spaces, similarly, became places of refuge from external oppression and internal strife. Making safe spaces safer in this way represented a fundamental shift in how psychological safety within group environments was conceived. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

使安全空间更安全:政治激进主义、治疗文化和女权主义意识提升的演变,1968-1988。
本文探讨了“安全空间”概念的起源之一。它的目的有两个:首先,通过使用女权主义意识提升(CR)的早期历史作为镜头,它引出了创造和维持心理安全的群体环境的方法和基本原理的相应转变。其次,通过这样做,本文旨在使围绕安全空间使用的当代辩论复杂化。我们今天与建立这样的环境相关的规则(要求保密,暂停判断)最初是由对企业社会责任集团内部权力不平衡的平等主义担忧引起的。然而,随着这种方法在20世纪70年代早期在激进女权主义者圈子之外的传播,它的目的和目标发生了变化,使它与自助和偶遇团体融合在一起。以改革为导向的全国妇女组织既促进了社会责任的广泛传播,同时也限制了这种做法。在这一过程中,由于CR的认知目标被淡化,这些团体现在更多地承担了情感支持功能。安全问题转而转向保护参与者免受群体体验的潜在心理伤害。这些心理安全措施随后被心理学家和教育工作者采用,而在20世纪80年代的激进分子圈子里,安全空间同样成为逃避外部压迫和内部冲突的地方。以这种方式使安全空间更安全代表了群体环境中心理安全的根本转变。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: History of Psychology features refereed articles addressing all aspects of psychology"s past and of its interrelationship with the many contexts within which it has emerged and has been practiced. It also publishes scholarly work in closely related areas, such as historical psychology (the history of consciousness and behavior), psychohistory, theory in psychology as it pertains to history, historiography, biography and autobiography, and the teaching of the history of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书