Yun-Woo Chang, Jung Kyu Ryu, Jin Kyung An, Nami Choi, Young Mi Park, Kyung Hee Ko
求助PDF
{"title":"Breast Cancers Detected and Missed by AI-CAD: Results from the AI-STREAM Trial.","authors":"Yun-Woo Chang, Jung Kyu Ryu, Jin Kyung An, Nami Choi, Young Mi Park, Kyung Hee Ko","doi":"10.1148/ryai.250281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To evaluate the characteristics of breast cancers detected and missed by artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis (AI-CAD) during screening mammography. Materials and Methods This retrospective secondary analysis was conducted using data from the Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening in Mammography trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05024591), a prospective, multicenter cohort study performed from 2021 to 2022. AI-CAD results were categorized into nine subgroups based on abnormality scores (in 10% increments). Positive predictive values of recall (PPV1s) were calculated for each subgroup and by breast density, and AI-CAD scores were compared with mammographic and pathologic features. Results A total of 24 543 women (mean age ± SD, 59.8 years ± 11.2), including two with bilateral cancer, were included; 148 cancers were confirmed by pathologic evaluation after 1 year of follow-up. AI-CAD results were negative in 23 010 cases (93.8%) and positive in 1535 (6.2%). The overall PPV1 was 8.7% (133 of 1535), with a sensitivity of 89.9% and specificity of 94.3%; PPV1 increased with higher abnormality scores but remained below 3% in groups 1 and 3 for dense breasts. AI-CAD detected 3.4% (five of 148) of cancers missed by radiologists but missed 8.1% (12 of 148) that were detected at radiologist recall. Abnormality scores were lower in patients presenting with mammographic asymmetry (<i>P</i> = .001) and luminal A subtype (<i>P</i> = .032). Conclusion AI-CAD shows potential to improve breast cancer detection in screening programs and to support radiologists in mammogram interpretation. Understanding the imaging and pathologic features of cancers detected or missed by AI-CAD may enhance its effective clinical application. <b>Keywords:</b> Breast Cancer, Mammography, AI CAD Clinical trial registration no. NCT05024591 © RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Do and Bahl in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e250281"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.250281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the characteristics of breast cancers detected and missed by artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis (AI-CAD) during screening mammography. Materials and Methods This retrospective secondary analysis was conducted using data from the Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening in Mammography trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05024591), a prospective, multicenter cohort study performed from 2021 to 2022. AI-CAD results were categorized into nine subgroups based on abnormality scores (in 10% increments). Positive predictive values of recall (PPV1s) were calculated for each subgroup and by breast density, and AI-CAD scores were compared with mammographic and pathologic features. Results A total of 24 543 women (mean age ± SD, 59.8 years ± 11.2), including two with bilateral cancer, were included; 148 cancers were confirmed by pathologic evaluation after 1 year of follow-up. AI-CAD results were negative in 23 010 cases (93.8%) and positive in 1535 (6.2%). The overall PPV1 was 8.7% (133 of 1535), with a sensitivity of 89.9% and specificity of 94.3%; PPV1 increased with higher abnormality scores but remained below 3% in groups 1 and 3 for dense breasts. AI-CAD detected 3.4% (five of 148) of cancers missed by radiologists but missed 8.1% (12 of 148) that were detected at radiologist recall. Abnormality scores were lower in patients presenting with mammographic asymmetry (P = .001) and luminal A subtype (P = .032). Conclusion AI-CAD shows potential to improve breast cancer detection in screening programs and to support radiologists in mammogram interpretation. Understanding the imaging and pathologic features of cancers detected or missed by AI-CAD may enhance its effective clinical application. Keywords: Breast Cancer, Mammography, AI CAD Clinical trial registration no. NCT05024591 © RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Do and Bahl in this issue.
AI-CAD检测和遗漏乳腺癌:来自AI-STREAM试验的结果。
目的评价基于人工智能的计算机辅助诊断(AI-CAD)在乳腺x线筛查中发现和漏诊的乳腺癌特征。材料和方法本回顾性二次分析使用人工智能乳腺x线摄影筛查试验(ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05024591)的数据进行,这是一项前瞻性多中心队列研究,于2021年至2022年进行。AI-CAD结果根据异常评分分为9个亚组(以10%的增量)。计算每个亚组和乳腺密度的阳性回忆率预测值(PPV1),并比较AI-CAD评分和乳腺x线摄影和病理特征。结果共纳入24543例女性(平均年龄59.8岁±11.2 [SD]),其中双侧肿瘤2例,随访1年后病理证实肿瘤148例。AI-CAD阴性23,010例(93.8%),阳性1,535例(6.2%)。总体PPV1为8.7%(133/ 1535),敏感性为89.9%,特异性为94.3%,PPV1随着异常评分的增加而增加,但在致密乳房的1组和3组中仍低于3%。AI-CAD检测出被放射科医生遗漏的3.4%(5/148)的癌症,但遗漏了被放射科医生召回的8.1%(12/148)的癌症。乳房x线摄影不对称(P = 0.001)和腔内A亚型(P = 0.032)患者的异常评分较低。结论AI-CAD显示了在筛查项目中提高乳腺癌检测的潜力,并支持放射科医生对乳房x线照片的解释。了解AI-CAD检测或漏诊肿瘤的影像学及病理特征,有助于提高其临床有效应用。©RSNA, 2025年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。