Pericervical Dentin Preservation: Comparative Study of Three Reciprocating Systems.

Revista Cientifica Odontologica Pub Date : 2025-08-31 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.21142/2523-2754-1303-2025-250
Daniel López-Velasco, Carmen Rojano-Buelvas, Liceth Rodríguez-Wilches, Javier Alvear-Pérez, José Flórez-Ariza, Luisa Barriga-Periñán, Jaime Plazas-Román
{"title":"Pericervical Dentin Preservation: Comparative Study of Three Reciprocating Systems.","authors":"Daniel López-Velasco, Carmen Rojano-Buelvas, Liceth Rodríguez-Wilches, Javier Alvear-Pérez, José Flórez-Ariza, Luisa Barriga-Periñán, Jaime Plazas-Román","doi":"10.21142/2523-2754-1303-2025-250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endodontic treatment aims to disinfect and shape root canals through controlled wear of their walls. Selecting the appropriate rotary system is essential for preserving pericervical dentin. To compare pericervical dentin wear produced by three reciprocating.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>systems (WaveOne Gold, One Reci, and Reciproc Blue).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>An in vitro experimental study was conducted using 30 single-rooted premolars, randomly distributed into three groups of 10 teeth each. Tomographic evaluations were performed before and after instrumentation, measuring mesial, distal, palatal/lingual, and buccal surfaces at 4 mm from the cemento-enamel junction. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the three systems, with Dunn's post-hoc test for pairwise comparisons (significance level p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was found in the distal sector (p=0.005), with One Reci causing the least wear (0.05±0.02mm) compared to WaveOne Gold (0.21±0.21mm). No significant differences were found in the mesial, buccal, and palatal surfaces. Conclusions: One Reci proved to be the most conservative system for pericervical dentin, suggesting that system selection can significantly impact dental structure preservation during endodontic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":33326,"journal":{"name":"Revista Cientifica Odontologica","volume":"13 3","pages":"e250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12551564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Cientifica Odontologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21142/2523-2754-1303-2025-250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endodontic treatment aims to disinfect and shape root canals through controlled wear of their walls. Selecting the appropriate rotary system is essential for preserving pericervical dentin. To compare pericervical dentin wear produced by three reciprocating.

Objective: systems (WaveOne Gold, One Reci, and Reciproc Blue).

Methodology: An in vitro experimental study was conducted using 30 single-rooted premolars, randomly distributed into three groups of 10 teeth each. Tomographic evaluations were performed before and after instrumentation, measuring mesial, distal, palatal/lingual, and buccal surfaces at 4 mm from the cemento-enamel junction. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the three systems, with Dunn's post-hoc test for pairwise comparisons (significance level p<0.05).

Results: A statistically significant difference was found in the distal sector (p=0.005), with One Reci causing the least wear (0.05±0.02mm) compared to WaveOne Gold (0.21±0.21mm). No significant differences were found in the mesial, buccal, and palatal surfaces. Conclusions: One Reci proved to be the most conservative system for pericervical dentin, suggesting that system selection can significantly impact dental structure preservation during endodontic treatment.

Abstract Image

颈周牙本质保存:三种往复系统的比较研究。
根管治疗的目的是通过控制根管管壁的磨损来消毒和塑造根管。选择合适的旋转系统是保护颈周牙本质的关键。比较三种往复牙本质产生的颈周磨损。目标:系统(WaveOne Gold, One Reci,和Reciproc Blue)。方法:采用体外实验方法,将30颗单根前磨牙随机分为3组,每组10颗。在器械前后进行断层扫描评估,测量离牙骨质-牙釉质交界处4mm处的近中、远端、腭/舌面和颊面。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验对三种系统进行比较,并使用Dunn事后检验进行两两比较(显著性水平)结果:在远端部分发现具有统计学意义的差异(p=0.005), One Reci与WaveOne Gold(0.21±0.21mm)相比造成的磨损最小(0.05±0.02mm)。在中、颊和腭面没有发现明显的差异。结论:一种Reci系统被证明是最保守的宫颈周牙本质系统,这表明在根管治疗过程中,系统的选择可以显著影响牙结构的保存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书