Measuring executive function in preschoolers: Is a single assessment occasion sufficient?

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-27 DOI:10.1037/pas0001419
Michael T Willoughby, Jason Williams, Erich M Lauff, Kesha Hudson
{"title":"Measuring executive function in preschoolers: Is a single assessment occasion sufficient?","authors":"Michael T Willoughby, Jason Williams, Erich M Lauff, Kesha Hudson","doi":"10.1037/pas0001419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines whether a single assessment occasion is sufficient to measure executive function (EF) in preschoolers. We administered a battery of EF tasks to 283 children aged 3-5 years (54% female) from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds (41% non-Hispanic white, 36% non-Hispanic black, 14% Hispanic, 8% mixed race, 1% Asian, 1% American Indian) across three occasions within an academic year. Using longitudinal bifactor models, we decomposed task performance into trait and state components. Results indicated that most of the reliable variation in EF task scores reflected trait-level influences (consistency estimates = 50%-89%). By contrast, most of the reliable variation in comparison task scores (simple reaction time task; assessor-rated attention during testing) reflected state-level influences (consistency estimates = 32%-36%). This is the first study to characterize the relative proportion of state- and trait-level influences on EF tasks in preschool-aged children. Our study underscores the importance of considering both trait and state influences in EF measurement and provides recommendations for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines whether a single assessment occasion is sufficient to measure executive function (EF) in preschoolers. We administered a battery of EF tasks to 283 children aged 3-5 years (54% female) from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds (41% non-Hispanic white, 36% non-Hispanic black, 14% Hispanic, 8% mixed race, 1% Asian, 1% American Indian) across three occasions within an academic year. Using longitudinal bifactor models, we decomposed task performance into trait and state components. Results indicated that most of the reliable variation in EF task scores reflected trait-level influences (consistency estimates = 50%-89%). By contrast, most of the reliable variation in comparison task scores (simple reaction time task; assessor-rated attention during testing) reflected state-level influences (consistency estimates = 32%-36%). This is the first study to characterize the relative proportion of state- and trait-level influences on EF tasks in preschool-aged children. Our study underscores the importance of considering both trait and state influences in EF measurement and provides recommendations for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

测量学龄前儿童的执行功能:单一的评估场合是否足够?
本研究探讨单一的评估场合是否足以衡量学龄前儿童的执行功能。我们对283名3-5岁儿童(54%为女性)进行了一系列EF任务,这些儿童来自不同的种族和民族背景(41%非西班牙裔白人,36%非西班牙裔黑人,14%西班牙裔,8%混合种族,1%亚洲人,1%美洲印第安人),在一个学年中分三次进行。采用纵向双因素模型,将任务绩效分解为特征和状态两个分量。结果表明,EF任务得分的大部分可靠变化反映了特质水平的影响(一致性估计= 50%-89%)。相比之下,比较任务得分(简单反应时间任务;测试期间评估者评定的注意力)的大多数可靠变化反映了状态水平的影响(一致性估计= 32%-36%)。这是第一个描述状态和特质水平对学龄前儿童EF任务影响的相对比例的研究。我们的研究强调了在EF测量中同时考虑特质和状态影响的重要性,并为未来的研究提供了建议。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书