Metals exposure and biomarkers of liver damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

IF 5.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Reviews on Environmental Health Pub Date : 2025-10-29 Print Date: 2026-03-26 DOI:10.1515/reveh-2025-0089
Ibrahim Issah, Serwaa A Bawua, John Arko-Mensah, Mabel S Duah, Shirley V Simpson, Thomas P Agyekum, Olalekan A Uthman, Julius N Fobil
{"title":"Metals exposure and biomarkers of liver damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.","authors":"Ibrahim Issah, Serwaa A Bawua, John Arko-Mensah, Mabel S Duah, Shirley V Simpson, Thomas P Agyekum, Olalekan A Uthman, Julius N Fobil","doi":"10.1515/reveh-2025-0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Environmental exposure to metals represents a significant global health concern, yet the hepatotoxic potential of these contaminants remains incompletely characterized. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the association between exposure to metals and liver damage as indicated by liver enzyme alterations.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases for epidemiological studies that examined associations between metal exposure and liver enzymes. Using random-effects models, we calculated pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for each metal. Subgroup analyses explored variations by geographical region, exposure assessment methodology, liver biomarkers, and study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Thirty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. All four metals showed significant positive associations with liver damage, with cadmium exhibiting the strongest association (SMD=5.98, 95 % CI: 2.16-9.87), followed by lead (SMD=5.48, 95 % CI: 0.63-10.33), mercury (SMD=5.15, 95 % CI: 0.21-10.51), and arsenic (SMD=1.52, 95 % CI: 0.53-2.52). Metal-specific patterns of liver enzyme alterations were observed: arsenic primarily affected transaminases (ALT, AST), while cadmium, mercury, and lead showed stronger associations with AST and GGT.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis provides robust evidence that environmental exposure to arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead is significantly associated with liver damage across diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21165,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on Environmental Health","volume":" ","pages":"109-141"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2025-0089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Environmental exposure to metals represents a significant global health concern, yet the hepatotoxic potential of these contaminants remains incompletely characterized. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the association between exposure to metals and liver damage as indicated by liver enzyme alterations.

Content: We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases for epidemiological studies that examined associations between metal exposure and liver enzymes. Using random-effects models, we calculated pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for each metal. Subgroup analyses explored variations by geographical region, exposure assessment methodology, liver biomarkers, and study characteristics.

Summary: Thirty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. All four metals showed significant positive associations with liver damage, with cadmium exhibiting the strongest association (SMD=5.98, 95 % CI: 2.16-9.87), followed by lead (SMD=5.48, 95 % CI: 0.63-10.33), mercury (SMD=5.15, 95 % CI: 0.21-10.51), and arsenic (SMD=1.52, 95 % CI: 0.53-2.52). Metal-specific patterns of liver enzyme alterations were observed: arsenic primarily affected transaminases (ALT, AST), while cadmium, mercury, and lead showed stronger associations with AST and GGT.

Outlook: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides robust evidence that environmental exposure to arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead is significantly associated with liver damage across diverse populations.

金属暴露和肝损伤的生物标志物:观察性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
环境暴露于金属是一个重大的全球健康问题,但这些污染物的肝毒性潜力仍然没有完全表征。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在量化暴露于金属和肝损伤之间的关系,肝酶改变表明。内容:我们对流行病学研究的电子数据库进行了全面的搜索,以检查金属暴露与肝酶之间的关系。使用随机效应模型,我们计算了每种金属的95% %置信区间(ci)的合并标准化平均差异(SMDs)。亚组分析探讨了地理区域、暴露评估方法、肝脏生物标志物和研究特征的差异。总结:39项研究符合纳入标准。所有四种金属都与肝损伤呈显著正相关,其中镉表现出最强的相关性(SMD=5.98, 95 % CI: 2.16-9.87),其次是铅(SMD=5.48, 95 % CI: 0.63-10.33),汞(SMD=5.15, 95 % CI: 0.21-10.51)和砷(SMD=1.52, 95 % CI: 0.53-2.52)。观察到金属特异性肝酶改变模式:砷主要影响转氨酶(ALT, AST),而镉,汞和铅显示与AST和GGT有更强的关联。展望:本系统综述和荟萃分析提供了强有力的证据,表明砷、镉、汞和铅的环境暴露与不同人群的肝损伤显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews on Environmental Health
Reviews on Environmental Health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Reviews on Environmental Health (REVEH) is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to fill the need for publication of review articles on hot topics in the field of environmental health. Reviews on Environmental Health aims to be an inspiring forum for scientists, environmentalists, physicians, engineers, and students who are concerned with aspects of human health, including quality of life, that are determined by physiological and psychosociological interactions between man and physical, chemical, biological, and social factors in the environment. Reviews on Environmental Health is an important niche served by no other journal, that’s being a site where thoughtful reviews can be published on a variety of subjects related to both health and environment. One challenge is to bridge the research on environmental causes of disease with the clinical practice of medicine. Reviews on Environmental Health is a source of integrated information on environment and health subjects that will be of value to the broad scientific community, whether students, junior and senior professionals, or clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书