Ibrahim Issah, Serwaa A Bawua, John Arko-Mensah, Mabel S Duah, Shirley V Simpson, Thomas P Agyekum, Olalekan A Uthman, Julius N Fobil
{"title":"Metals exposure and biomarkers of liver damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.","authors":"Ibrahim Issah, Serwaa A Bawua, John Arko-Mensah, Mabel S Duah, Shirley V Simpson, Thomas P Agyekum, Olalekan A Uthman, Julius N Fobil","doi":"10.1515/reveh-2025-0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Environmental exposure to metals represents a significant global health concern, yet the hepatotoxic potential of these contaminants remains incompletely characterized. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the association between exposure to metals and liver damage as indicated by liver enzyme alterations.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases for epidemiological studies that examined associations between metal exposure and liver enzymes. Using random-effects models, we calculated pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for each metal. Subgroup analyses explored variations by geographical region, exposure assessment methodology, liver biomarkers, and study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Thirty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. All four metals showed significant positive associations with liver damage, with cadmium exhibiting the strongest association (SMD=5.98, 95 % CI: 2.16-9.87), followed by lead (SMD=5.48, 95 % CI: 0.63-10.33), mercury (SMD=5.15, 95 % CI: 0.21-10.51), and arsenic (SMD=1.52, 95 % CI: 0.53-2.52). Metal-specific patterns of liver enzyme alterations were observed: arsenic primarily affected transaminases (ALT, AST), while cadmium, mercury, and lead showed stronger associations with AST and GGT.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis provides robust evidence that environmental exposure to arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead is significantly associated with liver damage across diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21165,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on Environmental Health","volume":" ","pages":"109-141"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2025-0089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Environmental exposure to metals represents a significant global health concern, yet the hepatotoxic potential of these contaminants remains incompletely characterized. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the association between exposure to metals and liver damage as indicated by liver enzyme alterations.
Content: We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases for epidemiological studies that examined associations between metal exposure and liver enzymes. Using random-effects models, we calculated pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for each metal. Subgroup analyses explored variations by geographical region, exposure assessment methodology, liver biomarkers, and study characteristics.
Summary: Thirty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. All four metals showed significant positive associations with liver damage, with cadmium exhibiting the strongest association (SMD=5.98, 95 % CI: 2.16-9.87), followed by lead (SMD=5.48, 95 % CI: 0.63-10.33), mercury (SMD=5.15, 95 % CI: 0.21-10.51), and arsenic (SMD=1.52, 95 % CI: 0.53-2.52). Metal-specific patterns of liver enzyme alterations were observed: arsenic primarily affected transaminases (ALT, AST), while cadmium, mercury, and lead showed stronger associations with AST and GGT.
Outlook: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides robust evidence that environmental exposure to arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead is significantly associated with liver damage across diverse populations.
期刊介绍:
Reviews on Environmental Health (REVEH) is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to fill the need for publication of review articles on hot topics in the field of environmental health. Reviews on Environmental Health aims to be an inspiring forum for scientists, environmentalists, physicians, engineers, and students who are concerned with aspects of human health, including quality of life, that are determined by physiological and psychosociological interactions between man and physical, chemical, biological, and social factors in the environment.
Reviews on Environmental Health is an important niche served by no other journal, that’s being a site where thoughtful reviews can be published on a variety of subjects related to both health and environment. One challenge is to bridge the research on environmental causes of disease with the clinical practice of medicine. Reviews on Environmental Health is a source of integrated information on environment and health subjects that will be of value to the broad scientific community, whether students, junior and senior professionals, or clinicians.