Michael Wayne O'Dell, George Ghafari, Marc Campo, Abhishek Jaywant, Daniel Tufaro, Joan Toglia
{"title":"Validity of the stroke upper limb capacity scale in acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation.","authors":"Michael Wayne O'Dell, George Ghafari, Marc Campo, Abhishek Jaywant, Daniel Tufaro, Joan Toglia","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to determine the validity of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) and its three hand categories in an acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation setting. We included 312 persons, about 10 days poststroke, with a mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) of 7.3. Participants were also assessed on the functional independence measure (FIM), Upper Extremity-Motricity Index (UE-MI), modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, and proportion of home discharges. Spearmans rho between total SULCS and FIM-self-care score and UE-MI at admission were strong at 0.72 and 0.82, respectively. Correlations were stronger between SULCS and individual FIM items of eating, grooming, and bathing [rho= 0.52-0.57, that is, 'more' activity of daily living (ADL)-like items] rather than walking, bowel, and expression (rho= 0.28-0.51, that is, 'less' ADL-like items). Admission and discharge FIM, NIHSS, and proportion of home discharges were higher with more favorable SULCS hand categories. Floor effect was 11.9% and ceiling effect was 14.7% with an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.92). The SULCS is a valid measure of upper extremity capacity at admission to inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Further examination regarding ceiling effects and responsiveness in inpatient stroke rehabilitation is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"48 4","pages":"217-224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the validity of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) and its three hand categories in an acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation setting. We included 312 persons, about 10 days poststroke, with a mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) of 7.3. Participants were also assessed on the functional independence measure (FIM), Upper Extremity-Motricity Index (UE-MI), modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, and proportion of home discharges. Spearmans rho between total SULCS and FIM-self-care score and UE-MI at admission were strong at 0.72 and 0.82, respectively. Correlations were stronger between SULCS and individual FIM items of eating, grooming, and bathing [rho= 0.52-0.57, that is, 'more' activity of daily living (ADL)-like items] rather than walking, bowel, and expression (rho= 0.28-0.51, that is, 'less' ADL-like items). Admission and discharge FIM, NIHSS, and proportion of home discharges were higher with more favorable SULCS hand categories. Floor effect was 11.9% and ceiling effect was 14.7% with an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.92). The SULCS is a valid measure of upper extremity capacity at admission to inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Further examination regarding ceiling effects and responsiveness in inpatient stroke rehabilitation is recommended.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.