Validity of the stroke upper limb capacity scale in acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Michael Wayne O'Dell, George Ghafari, Marc Campo, Abhishek Jaywant, Daniel Tufaro, Joan Toglia
{"title":"Validity of the stroke upper limb capacity scale in acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation.","authors":"Michael Wayne O'Dell, George Ghafari, Marc Campo, Abhishek Jaywant, Daniel Tufaro, Joan Toglia","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to determine the validity of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) and its three hand categories in an acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation setting. We included 312 persons, about 10 days poststroke, with a mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) of 7.3. Participants were also assessed on the functional independence measure (FIM), Upper Extremity-Motricity Index (UE-MI), modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, and proportion of home discharges. Spearmans rho between total SULCS and FIM-self-care score and UE-MI at admission were strong at 0.72 and 0.82, respectively. Correlations were stronger between SULCS and individual FIM items of eating, grooming, and bathing [rho= 0.52-0.57, that is, 'more' activity of daily living (ADL)-like items] rather than walking, bowel, and expression (rho= 0.28-0.51, that is, 'less' ADL-like items). Admission and discharge FIM, NIHSS, and proportion of home discharges were higher with more favorable SULCS hand categories. Floor effect was 11.9% and ceiling effect was 14.7% with an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.92). The SULCS is a valid measure of upper extremity capacity at admission to inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Further examination regarding ceiling effects and responsiveness in inpatient stroke rehabilitation is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"48 4","pages":"217-224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the validity of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) and its three hand categories in an acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation setting. We included 312 persons, about 10 days poststroke, with a mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) of 7.3. Participants were also assessed on the functional independence measure (FIM), Upper Extremity-Motricity Index (UE-MI), modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, and proportion of home discharges. Spearmans rho between total SULCS and FIM-self-care score and UE-MI at admission were strong at 0.72 and 0.82, respectively. Correlations were stronger between SULCS and individual FIM items of eating, grooming, and bathing [rho= 0.52-0.57, that is, 'more' activity of daily living (ADL)-like items] rather than walking, bowel, and expression (rho= 0.28-0.51, that is, 'less' ADL-like items). Admission and discharge FIM, NIHSS, and proportion of home discharges were higher with more favorable SULCS hand categories. Floor effect was 11.9% and ceiling effect was 14.7% with an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.92). The SULCS is a valid measure of upper extremity capacity at admission to inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Further examination regarding ceiling effects and responsiveness in inpatient stroke rehabilitation is recommended.

卒中上肢能力量表在急性卒中住院患者康复中的有效性。
本研究的目的是确定中风上肢能力量表(SULCS)及其三个手部类别在急性住院中风康复环境中的有效性。我们纳入312人,卒中后约10天,平均nih卒中评分(NIHSS)为7.3。参与者还被评估了功能独立性测量(FIM)、上肢运动指数(UE-MI)、改良Charlson合并症指数和家庭出院比例。总SULCS与入院时fim -自我护理评分和UE-MI之间的Spearmans rho分别为0.72和0.82。SULCS与进食、梳洗和洗澡等单项FIM项目之间的相关性更强[rho= 0.52-0.57,即“更多”日常生活活动(ADL)类项目],而不是行走、排便和表达(rho= 0.28-0.51,即“更少”ADL类项目)。入院和出院FIM、NIHSS和家庭出院比例越高,SULCS手类越好。地板效应为11.9%,天花板效应为14.7%,具有可接受的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha为0.92)。SULCS是住院中风康复患者入院时上肢能力的有效测量。建议进一步检查脑卒中住院康复患者的天花板效应和反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书