Effect of Augmented Capacity Development Interventions (ACDI) on Information Utilization for Decision-Making in the Routine Health Information System in Public Health Institutions of Gofa Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2025-10-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329251381429
Bedilu Kucho Doka, Keneni Gutema Negeri, Abebaw Gebeyehu Worku, Dejene Hailu Kassa
{"title":"Effect of Augmented Capacity Development Interventions (ACDI) on Information Utilization for Decision-Making in the Routine Health Information System in Public Health Institutions of Gofa Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Bedilu Kucho Doka, Keneni Gutema Negeri, Abebaw Gebeyehu Worku, Dejene Hailu Kassa","doi":"10.1177/11786329251381429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many health systems fail to fully link evidence to decisions and suffer from inadequate ability to respond to priority health needs. Routine data use capacity-building efforts are poorly implemented, lacking integration, quality training, and adequate support.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of Augmented Capacity Development Interventions (ACDI) strategies on information utilization for decision-making in the Routine Health Information System (RHIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-arm parallel-group cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted across clusters of public health institutions. Baseline data were collected in April 2023, an eight-month intervention was implemented from July 2023 to February 2024, and end-line data were collected in April 2024. Training, supportive supervision, mentorship, recognition, and monitoring and evaluation were the ACDI strategies implemented in this study. The study involved 72 health institutions and 304 health workers. A general linear mixed model analysis was used to assess the effect of the intervention on information utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of participants with good information utilization increased significantly from 55.2% at baseline to 82.3% at the end-line among the intervention groups. The ACDI intervention has a significant effect on information utilization (β = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.33, <i>P</i> = .006). Moreover, availability of internet service (β = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.38; <i>P</i> = .017), culture of information utilization (β = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.22; <i>P</i> = .018), ease or skill of data management (β = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.39; <i>P</i> < .001) and timeliness of reports (β = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.40; <i>P</i> < .001) were predictors that increased information utilization in intervention health institutions as compared to control institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the implementation of ACDI led to a significant improvement in information utilization. These results suggest that the intervention effectively improved information use in the RHIS and support adopting this approach in similar settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration id: </strong>PACTR202212472091194, registered on 14 December 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251381429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12553876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251381429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many health systems fail to fully link evidence to decisions and suffer from inadequate ability to respond to priority health needs. Routine data use capacity-building efforts are poorly implemented, lacking integration, quality training, and adequate support.

Objective: This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of Augmented Capacity Development Interventions (ACDI) strategies on information utilization for decision-making in the Routine Health Information System (RHIS).

Methods: A two-arm parallel-group cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted across clusters of public health institutions. Baseline data were collected in April 2023, an eight-month intervention was implemented from July 2023 to February 2024, and end-line data were collected in April 2024. Training, supportive supervision, mentorship, recognition, and monitoring and evaluation were the ACDI strategies implemented in this study. The study involved 72 health institutions and 304 health workers. A general linear mixed model analysis was used to assess the effect of the intervention on information utilization.

Results: The proportion of participants with good information utilization increased significantly from 55.2% at baseline to 82.3% at the end-line among the intervention groups. The ACDI intervention has a significant effect on information utilization (β = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.33, P = .006). Moreover, availability of internet service (β = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.38; P = .017), culture of information utilization (β = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.22; P = .018), ease or skill of data management (β = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.39; P < .001) and timeliness of reports (β = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.40; P < .001) were predictors that increased information utilization in intervention health institutions as compared to control institutions.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the implementation of ACDI led to a significant improvement in information utilization. These results suggest that the intervention effectively improved information use in the RHIS and support adopting this approach in similar settings.

Trial registration id: PACTR202212472091194, registered on 14 December 2022.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

增强能力发展干预(ACDI)对埃塞俄比亚南部戈法地区公共卫生机构常规卫生信息系统决策信息利用的影响:一项聚类随机对照试验
背景:许多卫生系统未能将证据与决策充分联系起来,并且应对重点卫生需求的能力不足。常规数据使用能力建设工作执行不力,缺乏整合、高质量培训和充分支持。目的:本研究旨在评估增强能力发展干预(ACDI)策略对常规卫生信息系统(RHIS)决策信息利用的影响。方法:采用双组平行组随机对照试验,跨公共卫生机构聚类。基线数据于2023年4月收集,为期8个月的干预于2023年7月至2024年2月实施,终点数据于2024年4月收集。培训、支持性监督、指导、认可、监测和评估是本研究实施的ACDI策略。这项研究涉及72个卫生机构和304名卫生工作者。采用一般线性混合模型分析来评估干预对信息利用的影响。结果:在干预组中,信息利用良好的参与者比例从基线时的55.2%显著增加到终点时的82.3%。ACDI干预对信息利用有显著影响(β = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.33, P = 0.006)。此外,互联网服务的可用性(β = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.38; P = 0.017)、信息利用文化(β = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.22; P = 0.018)、数据管理的便捷性或技能(β = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.39; P < 0.001)和报告的及时性(β = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.40; P < 0.001)是干预卫生机构与对照机构相比提高信息利用的预测因素。结论:本研究表明,ACDI的实施导致了信息利用的显著提高。这些结果表明,干预有效地改善了RHIS的信息使用,并支持在类似环境中采用这种方法。试验注册id: PACTR202212472091194,注册于2022年12月14日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书