Network Approaches to Binary Assessment Data: Network Psychometrics Versus Latent Space Item Response Models.

IF 4.4 3区 心理学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Educational and Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2025-10-23 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1177/00131644251371187
Ludovica De Carolis, Minjeong Jeon
{"title":"Network Approaches to Binary Assessment Data: Network Psychometrics Versus Latent Space Item Response Models.","authors":"Ludovica De Carolis, Minjeong Jeon","doi":"10.1177/00131644251371187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compares two network-based approaches for analyzing binary psychological assessment data: network psychometrics and latent space item response modeling (LSIRM). Network psychometrics, a well-established method, infers relationships among items or symptoms based on pairwise conditional dependencies. In contrast, LSIRM is a more recent framework that represents item responses as a bipartite network of respondents and items embedded in a latent metric space, where the likelihood of a response decreases with increasing distance between the respondent and item. We evaluate the performance of both methods through simulation studies under varying data-generating conditions. In addition, we demonstrate their applications to real assessment data, showcasing the distinct insights each method offers to researchers and practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"217-253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12549609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644251371187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares two network-based approaches for analyzing binary psychological assessment data: network psychometrics and latent space item response modeling (LSIRM). Network psychometrics, a well-established method, infers relationships among items or symptoms based on pairwise conditional dependencies. In contrast, LSIRM is a more recent framework that represents item responses as a bipartite network of respondents and items embedded in a latent metric space, where the likelihood of a response decreases with increasing distance between the respondent and item. We evaluate the performance of both methods through simulation studies under varying data-generating conditions. In addition, we demonstrate their applications to real assessment data, showcasing the distinct insights each method offers to researchers and practitioners.

二元评估数据的网络方法:网络心理测量与潜在空间项目反应模型。
本研究比较了两种基于网络的二元心理评估数据分析方法:网络心理测量法和潜在空间项目反应模型(LSIRM)。网络心理测量是一种行之有效的方法,它基于成对条件依赖来推断项目或症状之间的关系。相比之下,LSIRM是一个较新的框架,它将项目反应表示为嵌入在潜在度量空间中的被调查者和项目的二分网络,其中响应的可能性随着被调查者和项目之间距离的增加而降低。我们通过在不同数据生成条件下的模拟研究来评估这两种方法的性能。此外,我们还展示了它们在真实评估数据中的应用,展示了每种方法为研究人员和从业者提供的独特见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Educational and Psychological Measurement 医学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Educational and Psychological Measurement (EPM) publishes referred scholarly work from all academic disciplines interested in the study of measurement theory, problems, and issues. Theoretical articles address new developments and techniques, and applied articles deal with innovation applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书