Neighborhood disadvantage and fecundability in a cohort of US Black women.

IF 4.2 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-10-23 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1097/EE9.0000000000000428
Amelia K Wesselink, Mary D Willis, Sharonda M Lovett, Chen Sheng, Wendy Kuohung, Jacqueline Hicks, Junenette L Peters, Shanshan Sheehy, Julie R Palmer, Lauren A Wise, Yvette Cozier
{"title":"Neighborhood disadvantage and fecundability in a cohort of US Black women.","authors":"Amelia K Wesselink, Mary D Willis, Sharonda M Lovett, Chen Sheng, Wendy Kuohung, Jacqueline Hicks, Junenette L Peters, Shanshan Sheehy, Julie R Palmer, Lauren A Wise, Yvette Cozier","doi":"10.1097/EE9.0000000000000428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neighborhood context is a root cause of health disparities, but few epidemiologic studies have measured the effect of neighborhoods on fertility, a reproductive outcome with known racial disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Black Women's Health Study is a prospective cohort study of US Black women who enrolled in 1995. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline and every 2 years afterwards. We linked participant addresses to US Census block group data on six variables representing neighborhood disadvantage and used factor analysis to derive a composite neighborhood disadvantage score. In 2011, participants reported how many months it took to conceive each of their planned pregnancies and whether they had ever tried to conceive for 12 or more months without success. We included 2,085 participants who contributed 2,712 pregnancy attempts during 1995-2011. We fit proportional probabilities regression models with generalized estimating equations to estimate fecundability ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We stratified models by individual-level educational attainment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative to the lowest quintile of neighborhood disadvantage, fecundability ratios for participants in quintiles 2, 3, 4, and 5 were 0.89 (95% CI = 0.79, 1.01), 0.94 (95% CI = 0.83, 1.06), 0.84 (95% CI = 0.74, 0.96), and 0.89 (95% CI = 0.79, 1.02), respectively. The association persisted only among participants with a college degree or higher.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher neighborhood disadvantage was associated with reduced fecundability in this cohort of Black women, particularly among those with high educational attainment. These results support the relevance of studying place-based risk factors for subfertility and have important implications for advancing reproductive justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11713,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Epidemiology","volume":"9 6","pages":"e428"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12551729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neighborhood context is a root cause of health disparities, but few epidemiologic studies have measured the effect of neighborhoods on fertility, a reproductive outcome with known racial disparities.

Methods: The Black Women's Health Study is a prospective cohort study of US Black women who enrolled in 1995. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline and every 2 years afterwards. We linked participant addresses to US Census block group data on six variables representing neighborhood disadvantage and used factor analysis to derive a composite neighborhood disadvantage score. In 2011, participants reported how many months it took to conceive each of their planned pregnancies and whether they had ever tried to conceive for 12 or more months without success. We included 2,085 participants who contributed 2,712 pregnancy attempts during 1995-2011. We fit proportional probabilities regression models with generalized estimating equations to estimate fecundability ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We stratified models by individual-level educational attainment.

Results: Relative to the lowest quintile of neighborhood disadvantage, fecundability ratios for participants in quintiles 2, 3, 4, and 5 were 0.89 (95% CI = 0.79, 1.01), 0.94 (95% CI = 0.83, 1.06), 0.84 (95% CI = 0.74, 0.96), and 0.89 (95% CI = 0.79, 1.02), respectively. The association persisted only among participants with a college degree or higher.

Conclusion: Higher neighborhood disadvantage was associated with reduced fecundability in this cohort of Black women, particularly among those with high educational attainment. These results support the relevance of studying place-based risk factors for subfertility and have important implications for advancing reproductive justice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

美国黑人妇女群体的邻里劣势与生育能力。
背景:邻里环境是健康差异的根本原因,但很少有流行病学研究测量邻里对生育率的影响,这是一种已知的种族差异的生殖结果。方法:黑人妇女健康研究是一项对1995年入组的美国黑人妇女的前瞻性队列研究。参与者在基线时和之后每两年完成一次问卷调查。我们将参与者的地址与美国人口普查block组数据联系起来,其中包含六个代表社区劣势的变量,并使用因子分析得出综合社区劣势得分。2011年,参与者报告了每次计划怀孕需要多少个月的时间,以及他们是否曾试图怀孕12个月或更长时间而没有成功。我们纳入了2,085名参与者,他们在1995-2011年期间进行了2,712次怀孕尝试。我们用广义估计方程拟合比例概率回归模型来估计可育率和95%置信区间(CI)。我们根据个人受教育程度对模型进行分层。结果:相对于邻里劣势最低的五分位数,2、3、4和5分位数的受孕率分别为0.89 (95% CI = 0.79, 1.01)、0.94 (95% CI = 0.83, 1.06)、0.84 (95% CI = 0.74, 0.96)和0.89 (95% CI = 0.79, 1.02)。这种联系只在拥有大学或更高学历的参与者中存在。结论:在这组黑人妇女中,较高的社区劣势与生育能力降低有关,特别是那些受教育程度高的妇女。这些结果支持了研究基于地点的低生育能力风险因素的相关性,并对促进生殖公正具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Epidemiology
Environmental Epidemiology Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
71
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书