Bladder wash as an alternative specimen for postmortem toxicology: Critical evaluation of 87 authentic samples

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Forensic science international Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112701
Théo Willeman , Berenice Royez , Nicolas Gattegno , Amandine Fort , Jérémy Borges , Coralie Boudin , François Paysant , Françoise Stanke-Labesque , Hélène Eysseric-Guerin , Virginie Scolan
{"title":"Bladder wash as an alternative specimen for postmortem toxicology: Critical evaluation of 87 authentic samples","authors":"Théo Willeman ,&nbsp;Berenice Royez ,&nbsp;Nicolas Gattegno ,&nbsp;Amandine Fort ,&nbsp;Jérémy Borges ,&nbsp;Coralie Boudin ,&nbsp;François Paysant ,&nbsp;Françoise Stanke-Labesque ,&nbsp;Hélène Eysseric-Guerin ,&nbsp;Virginie Scolan","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In post-mortem toxicology, the analysis of various biological matrices is essential for obtaining reliable results. However, conventional matrices may be challenging to analyze using standard protocols or might be unavailable. Bladder washing (BW) has emerged as a valuable alternative when urine samples are absent. This study aims to describe the BW sampling technique and provide a critical evaluation of its current utility in post-mortem toxicological practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>BW was performed during forensic autopsies, over a three-year period. BW samples were collected from cases where the bladder was empty, using a single 5 mL wash with a 0.9 % NaCl solution. Toxicological analyses were conducted upon request from law enforcement or prosecutors. Screenings for drugs of abuse and medications were performed using LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS, while volatiles were analyzed by HS-GC-FID. To characterize the wash, creatinine and protein assays were carried out. BW analytical results were subsequently compared to blood analyses in order to determined its sensitivity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study included 87 authentic BW samples, with a median BW volume of 2 mL. The subjects, 55.2 % of whom were women, ranged in age from 1 month to 92 years. The median post-mortem interval was 2 days. Sensitivity for drugs and for alcohol and volatiles were 91.6 % and 65.1 %, respectively. No substances were identified in 14 BW samples, mirroring blood findings. Biochemically, 82.2 % of BWs had undetectable creatinine levels (&lt;0.18 mmol/L) and elevated proteinuria (median: 2.92 g/L).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>BW yielded satisfactory results as a biological matrix for confirmatory toxicological analysis. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the advantages of close collaboration with forensic pathologists in advancing forensic practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 112701"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073825003457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In post-mortem toxicology, the analysis of various biological matrices is essential for obtaining reliable results. However, conventional matrices may be challenging to analyze using standard protocols or might be unavailable. Bladder washing (BW) has emerged as a valuable alternative when urine samples are absent. This study aims to describe the BW sampling technique and provide a critical evaluation of its current utility in post-mortem toxicological practice.

Methods

BW was performed during forensic autopsies, over a three-year period. BW samples were collected from cases where the bladder was empty, using a single 5 mL wash with a 0.9 % NaCl solution. Toxicological analyses were conducted upon request from law enforcement or prosecutors. Screenings for drugs of abuse and medications were performed using LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS, while volatiles were analyzed by HS-GC-FID. To characterize the wash, creatinine and protein assays were carried out. BW analytical results were subsequently compared to blood analyses in order to determined its sensitivity.

Results

This study included 87 authentic BW samples, with a median BW volume of 2 mL. The subjects, 55.2 % of whom were women, ranged in age from 1 month to 92 years. The median post-mortem interval was 2 days. Sensitivity for drugs and for alcohol and volatiles were 91.6 % and 65.1 %, respectively. No substances were identified in 14 BW samples, mirroring blood findings. Biochemically, 82.2 % of BWs had undetectable creatinine levels (<0.18 mmol/L) and elevated proteinuria (median: 2.92 g/L).

Conclusion

BW yielded satisfactory results as a biological matrix for confirmatory toxicological analysis. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the advantages of close collaboration with forensic pathologists in advancing forensic practice.
膀胱冲洗作为死后毒理学的替代标本:对87个真实样本的关键评估。
在死后毒理学中,各种生物基质的分析对于获得可靠的结果至关重要。然而,使用标准协议分析传统矩阵可能具有挑战性,或者可能不可用。膀胱冲洗(BW)已成为一个有价值的替代,当尿液样本缺失。本研究旨在描述动物体重取样技术,并对其目前在死后毒理学实践中的应用进行关键评估。方法:在法医尸检期间进行BW,为期三年。从膀胱空的病例中收集体重样本,用0.9% % NaCl溶液单次洗涤5 mL。毒理学分析是应执法部门或检察官的要求进行的。使用LC-MS/MS和LC-HRMS对滥用药物和药物进行筛选,使用HS-GC-FID对挥发物进行分析。为了表征洗涤,进行了肌酐和蛋白质测定。随后将体重分析结果与血液分析结果进行比较,以确定其敏感性。结果:本研究纳入87份真实的体重样本,体重体积中位数为2 mL。受试者55.2% 为女性,年龄从1个月到92岁不等。中位死亡间隔为2天。对药物、酒精和挥发物的敏感性分别为91.6 %和65.1% %。14份BW样本中未发现任何物质,与血液结果相符。生物化学方面,82.2 %的BW检测不到肌酐水平(结论:BW作为确认毒理学分析的生物基质结果令人满意。此外,本研究强调与法医病理学家密切合作在推进法医实践中的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书