Kunming Locomotor Training: neurological, functional, and autonomic outcomes in complete spinal cord injury.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Current Opinion in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-23 DOI:10.1097/WCO.0000000000001439
Hui Zhu, Kwok-Fai So, Xiaoqing Feng, Fang Niu, James David Guest
{"title":"Kunming Locomotor Training: neurological, functional, and autonomic outcomes in complete spinal cord injury.","authors":"Hui Zhu, Kwok-Fai So, Xiaoqing Feng, Fang Niu, James David Guest","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) is variable, and the contribution of locomotor training to neurological and functional outcomes remains debated. This review summarizes post-SCI locomotor recovery patterns, compares training modalities, and presents recovery findings from the Kunming Locomotor Training (KLT) program, one of the largest reported series of patients with initial complete (AIS A) injuries.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several months of intensive task-specific overground training yielded substantial gains in neurological, locomotor, and autonomic outcomes. In a retrospective cohort of 485 AIS A patients, 47% improved their AIS grade, while nearly all showed some locomotor recovery measured by the Kunming Locomotor Scale (KLS). A ≥4-point KLS gain strongly predicted AIS conversion (sensitivity 83%, specificity 82%). Recovery probability was highest with lower thoracic and lumbar injuries. Improvements, including ambulation with assistive devices, and significant bladder and bowel recovery occurred even without AIS change. These outcomes reinforce the importance of active, patient-driven training.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>KLT experience indicates that prolonged, intensive overground locomotor training can promote neurological and functional recovery in individuals with initially complete injuries. KLS provides a sensitive measure of functional progress. These findings underscore the clinical value of task-specific stepping and provide a new benchmark for evaluating sustained rehabilitation strategies and research into post-SCI recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"644-653"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12594139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) is variable, and the contribution of locomotor training to neurological and functional outcomes remains debated. This review summarizes post-SCI locomotor recovery patterns, compares training modalities, and presents recovery findings from the Kunming Locomotor Training (KLT) program, one of the largest reported series of patients with initial complete (AIS A) injuries.

Recent findings: Several months of intensive task-specific overground training yielded substantial gains in neurological, locomotor, and autonomic outcomes. In a retrospective cohort of 485 AIS A patients, 47% improved their AIS grade, while nearly all showed some locomotor recovery measured by the Kunming Locomotor Scale (KLS). A ≥4-point KLS gain strongly predicted AIS conversion (sensitivity 83%, specificity 82%). Recovery probability was highest with lower thoracic and lumbar injuries. Improvements, including ambulation with assistive devices, and significant bladder and bowel recovery occurred even without AIS change. These outcomes reinforce the importance of active, patient-driven training.

Summary: KLT experience indicates that prolonged, intensive overground locomotor training can promote neurological and functional recovery in individuals with initially complete injuries. KLS provides a sensitive measure of functional progress. These findings underscore the clinical value of task-specific stepping and provide a new benchmark for evaluating sustained rehabilitation strategies and research into post-SCI recovery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

昆明运动训练:完全性脊髓损伤的神经、功能和自主神经预后。
回顾目的:脊髓损伤(SCI)后的恢复是可变的,运动训练对神经和功能预后的贡献仍然存在争议。这篇综述总结了脊髓损伤后的运动恢复模式,比较了训练方式,并介绍了昆明运动训练(KLT)项目的恢复结果。昆明运动训练(KLT)项目是报道最多的初始完全性损伤(AIS A)患者系列之一。最近的研究发现:几个月的高强度任务特异性地面训练在神经、运动和自主神经方面取得了实质性的进展。在485例AIS a患者的回顾性队列中,47%的患者AIS等级得到改善,而几乎所有患者都通过昆明运动量表(KLS)显示出一定程度的运动恢复。≥4点的KLS增益可强烈预测AIS转换(敏感性83%,特异性82%)。下胸腰椎损伤恢复概率最高。即使在没有AIS改变的情况下,也出现了改善,包括使用辅助装置行走,以及显著的膀胱和肠道恢复。这些结果强化了积极的、病人驱动的培训的重要性。总结:KLT的经验表明,长时间、高强度的地面运动训练可以促进最初完全损伤的个体的神经和功能恢复。KLS提供了功能进展的敏感度量。这些发现强调了任务特异性步进的临床价值,并为评估持续康复策略和研究脊髓损伤后恢复提供了新的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Neurology
Current Opinion in Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Neurology is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews; covering key subjects such as cerebrovascular disease, developmental disorders, neuroimaging and demyelinating diseases. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Neurology introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the neurology field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书