Eastern pine sensitivity in New England.

J N Kalliel, G A Settipane
{"title":"Eastern pine sensitivity in New England.","authors":"J N Kalliel,&nbsp;G A Settipane","doi":"10.2500/108854188779023379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to assess the frequency of clinical sensitivity to Eastern White Pine Pollen, 100 consecutive patients with the seasonal (SAR) or perennial (PAR) allergic rhinitis seen in the allergy clinic were prick tested with pine pollen extract, 8-tree mixture, histamine and negative control. Positive skin test (ST) was defined as a wheal greater than 3 mm larger than control, plus flare. Patients with a positive ST were then asked to stop antihistamine and other related drug, for 48 hours and challenged in a double blind manner with increasing concentrations of intranasal pine extract, starting at 1/100,000 w/v, followed by 1/10,000, 1/1000 and 1/100 at 20 minute intervals. The dose given was 0.15 cc by metered dose spray; one nostril received pine extract diluted in saline, the other received plain saline,. Rhinometric measurements were obtained before and 20 minutes after each challenge. Positive challenges were defined as 1) subjective feeling of increased stuffiness or rhinorrhea and 2) greater than 25% decrease in nasal airflow. Six patients (6%) had a positive ST to pine pollen extract and two of four patients with positive pine skin test had a positive FAST. Four of these were challenged intranasally, 2 had a positive challenge. All six patients had a history of spring SAR and positive reaction to 8-tree mix. Out of the 100 patients skin tested, 61 had spring SAR; therefore, the incidence of positive ST to pine in patients with spring SAR was 6/61 (10%). We conclude that pine pollen can be a cause of spring SAR in the New England area.</p>","PeriodicalId":77755,"journal":{"name":"New England and regional allergy proceedings","volume":"9 3","pages":"233-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/108854188779023379","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England and regional allergy proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/108854188779023379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the frequency of clinical sensitivity to Eastern White Pine Pollen, 100 consecutive patients with the seasonal (SAR) or perennial (PAR) allergic rhinitis seen in the allergy clinic were prick tested with pine pollen extract, 8-tree mixture, histamine and negative control. Positive skin test (ST) was defined as a wheal greater than 3 mm larger than control, plus flare. Patients with a positive ST were then asked to stop antihistamine and other related drug, for 48 hours and challenged in a double blind manner with increasing concentrations of intranasal pine extract, starting at 1/100,000 w/v, followed by 1/10,000, 1/1000 and 1/100 at 20 minute intervals. The dose given was 0.15 cc by metered dose spray; one nostril received pine extract diluted in saline, the other received plain saline,. Rhinometric measurements were obtained before and 20 minutes after each challenge. Positive challenges were defined as 1) subjective feeling of increased stuffiness or rhinorrhea and 2) greater than 25% decrease in nasal airflow. Six patients (6%) had a positive ST to pine pollen extract and two of four patients with positive pine skin test had a positive FAST. Four of these were challenged intranasally, 2 had a positive challenge. All six patients had a history of spring SAR and positive reaction to 8-tree mix. Out of the 100 patients skin tested, 61 had spring SAR; therefore, the incidence of positive ST to pine in patients with spring SAR was 6/61 (10%). We conclude that pine pollen can be a cause of spring SAR in the New England area.

新英格兰东部松树的敏感性。
本研究的目的是评估临床对东部白松花粉的敏感频率,对100例连续在过敏临床中发现的季节性(SAR)或多年性(PAR)变应性鼻炎患者进行松花粉提取物、八树混合物、组胺和阴性对照的点刺试验。皮肤试验(ST)阳性定义为车轮比对照组大3mm以上,并伴有耀斑。ST阳性的患者被要求停用抗组胺药和其他相关药物48小时,并以双盲方式增加鼻内松提取物浓度,从1/100,000 w/v开始,然后以1/10,000,1/1000和1/100的间隔20分钟进行挑战。计量喷雾给药0.15 cc;一个鼻孔接受盐水稀释的松树提取物,另一个鼻孔接受普通盐水。每次注射前和注射后20分钟进行鼻测量。积极挑战被定义为1)主观感觉鼻塞或流涕增加,2)鼻气流减少超过25%。6例(6%)患者松花粉提取物ST阳性,4例松皮试验阳性患者中2例FAST阳性。其中4例为鼻内挑战,2例为阳性挑战。6例患者均有春季SAR病史,8树混合药阳性反应。在接受皮肤测试的100名患者中,有61名患有春季SAR;因此,春季SAR患者ST - pine阳性的发生率为6/61(10%)。我们得出结论,松花粉可能是新英格兰地区春季SAR的一个原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信