Reconstructing trust in preventive care: Black women's perspectives on equity-centered, cervical cancer interventions.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Ethnicity & Health Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-26 DOI:10.1080/13557858.2025.2577130
Toluwani E Adekunle, Tiwaladeoluwa B Adekunle, Sabena Thomas
{"title":"Reconstructing trust in preventive care: Black women's perspectives on equity-centered, cervical cancer interventions.","authors":"Toluwani E Adekunle, Tiwaladeoluwa B Adekunle, Sabena Thomas","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2025.2577130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black women in the United States face disproportionately high rates of cervical cancer incidence and mortality, driven in part by structural racism, medical mistrust, and barriers to culturally responsive care. Existing interventions often overlook the lived experiences of Black women and fail to address the systemic roots of healthcare inequities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore how Black women conceptualize healthcare mistrust and identify multilevel changes needed to improve cervical cancer screening and equity-centered preventive care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with self-identified Black women aged 21-65 years between February and April 2023. Guided by an integrated theoretical framework including Ecological Systems Theory, Ecosocial Theory of Embodiment, Intersectionality, and Black Feminist Thought. Interviews were thematically analyzed to surface key barriers and recommendations. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling, and thematic saturation was achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes emerged: (1) increasing access to affordable, community-centered healthcare; (2) expanding reproductive health knowledge and addressing informational gaps; (3) enhancing provider training in diversity, equity, and culturally responsive care; and (4) implementing systemic reforms to rebuild trust and deliver holistic, justice-driven healthcare. Participants underscored the importance of long-term community engagement, generational knowledge transfer, and trauma-informed care. Trust was framed as a central determinant, shaped by intersecting histories of discrimination and institutional exclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the urgent need for systemic transformation in preventive care delivery. Improving cervical cancer outcomes among Black women requires multilevel strategies that prioritize trust, equity, and the leadership of communities most affected. These insights inform policy, provider training, and structural reforms aimed at advancing justice in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2025.2577130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Black women in the United States face disproportionately high rates of cervical cancer incidence and mortality, driven in part by structural racism, medical mistrust, and barriers to culturally responsive care. Existing interventions often overlook the lived experiences of Black women and fail to address the systemic roots of healthcare inequities.

Objective: To explore how Black women conceptualize healthcare mistrust and identify multilevel changes needed to improve cervical cancer screening and equity-centered preventive care.

Methods: Seventeen in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with self-identified Black women aged 21-65 years between February and April 2023. Guided by an integrated theoretical framework including Ecological Systems Theory, Ecosocial Theory of Embodiment, Intersectionality, and Black Feminist Thought. Interviews were thematically analyzed to surface key barriers and recommendations. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling, and thematic saturation was achieved.

Results: Four major themes emerged: (1) increasing access to affordable, community-centered healthcare; (2) expanding reproductive health knowledge and addressing informational gaps; (3) enhancing provider training in diversity, equity, and culturally responsive care; and (4) implementing systemic reforms to rebuild trust and deliver holistic, justice-driven healthcare. Participants underscored the importance of long-term community engagement, generational knowledge transfer, and trauma-informed care. Trust was framed as a central determinant, shaped by intersecting histories of discrimination and institutional exclusion.

Conclusions: This study highlights the urgent need for systemic transformation in preventive care delivery. Improving cervical cancer outcomes among Black women requires multilevel strategies that prioritize trust, equity, and the leadership of communities most affected. These insights inform policy, provider training, and structural reforms aimed at advancing justice in healthcare.

重建信任在预防保健:黑人妇女对平等为中心的观点,宫颈癌干预。
背景:美国黑人妇女面临着不成比例的高宫颈癌发病率和死亡率,部分原因是结构性种族主义、医疗不信任和文化反应性护理的障碍。现有的干预措施往往忽视了黑人妇女的生活经历,未能解决医疗不平等的系统性根源。目的:探讨黑人妇女如何理解医疗保健不信任,并确定改善宫颈癌筛查和以公平为中心的预防保健所需的多层次变化。方法:于2023年2月至4月对自认为21-65岁的黑人女性进行了17次深度、半结构化访谈。以生态系统理论、体现性生态社会理论、交叉性生态社会理论、黑人女性主义思想为理论框架。对访谈进行主题分析,以揭示主要障碍和建议。参与者通过有目的的抽样来招募,并达到主题饱和。结果:出现了四个主要主题:(1)增加获得负担得起的、以社区为中心的医疗服务的机会;(2)扩大生殖健康知识和解决信息差距;(3)加强提供者在多元化、公平和文化响应性护理方面的培训;(4)实施系统性改革,重建信任,提供全面、公正的医疗服务。与会者强调了长期社区参与、代际知识转移和创伤知情护理的重要性。信任被认为是一个核心决定因素,是由相互交织的歧视和体制排斥历史塑造的。结论:本研究强调了预防保健服务系统转型的迫切需要。改善黑人妇女宫颈癌的预后需要多层次的战略,优先考虑信任、公平和受影响最严重的社区的领导。这些见解为旨在促进医疗保健公正的政策、提供者培训和结构改革提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Health
Ethnicity & Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Health is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书