Katleen Janssens, Marjan De Rademaeker, Joke Muys, Bettina Blaumeiser, Katrien Janssens
{"title":"Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) - four-year single center experience.","authors":"Katleen Janssens, Marjan De Rademaeker, Joke Muys, Bettina Blaumeiser, Katrien Janssens","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2025-0302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluates the diagnostic yield of prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) and its impact on outcome, such as termination of pregnancy (TOP) or neonatal management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of more than 4 years of prenatal WES at a single genetic center was performed. Inclusion criteria included normal genome-wide deletion/duplication analysis and ≥1 ultrasound anomaly. Trio analysis was performed, filtering for <i>de novo</i>, compound heterozygous, homozygous, and hemizygous variants, complemented by a genome-wide phenotype-driven analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(Likely) pathogenic variants fitting the phenotype were identified in 36 of 171 cases (21.1 %), of which 19 were <i>de novo</i>, 14 autosomal recessive, one autosomal dominant, and 2 X-linked dominant. Median turnaround time was 16 days. Parents opted for TOP in 21 cases, three resulted in intrauterine death, 11 were carried to term and one was lost to follow-up. Among the neonates, the diagnosis led to optimized postnatal management in 8/11 (72.7 %), abstinence of care in two (18.2 %) and exclusion of syndromic disorders in one (9.1 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that in 1/5 pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies and normal deletion/duplication analysis, a (likely) pathogenic variant explaining the phenotype can be identified. The high proportion (17/36 or 47.2 %) of inherited variants highlights the importance of WES for recurrence risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"340-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2025-0302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluates the diagnostic yield of prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) and its impact on outcome, such as termination of pregnancy (TOP) or neonatal management.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of more than 4 years of prenatal WES at a single genetic center was performed. Inclusion criteria included normal genome-wide deletion/duplication analysis and ≥1 ultrasound anomaly. Trio analysis was performed, filtering for de novo, compound heterozygous, homozygous, and hemizygous variants, complemented by a genome-wide phenotype-driven analysis.
Results: (Likely) pathogenic variants fitting the phenotype were identified in 36 of 171 cases (21.1 %), of which 19 were de novo, 14 autosomal recessive, one autosomal dominant, and 2 X-linked dominant. Median turnaround time was 16 days. Parents opted for TOP in 21 cases, three resulted in intrauterine death, 11 were carried to term and one was lost to follow-up. Among the neonates, the diagnosis led to optimized postnatal management in 8/11 (72.7 %), abstinence of care in two (18.2 %) and exclusion of syndromic disorders in one (9.1 %).
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that in 1/5 pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies and normal deletion/duplication analysis, a (likely) pathogenic variant explaining the phenotype can be identified. The high proportion (17/36 or 47.2 %) of inherited variants highlights the importance of WES for recurrence risk assessment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.