Cross-sectional associations of self-reported firearm use with blood lead concentrations in a nationally representative cohort of US adults.

IF 4.2 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-10-23 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1097/EE9.0000000000000427
Madeline Day, Joseph M Braun, Christian Hoover
{"title":"Cross-sectional associations of self-reported firearm use with blood lead concentrations in a nationally representative cohort of US adults.","authors":"Madeline Day, Joseph M Braun, Christian Hoover","doi":"10.1097/EE9.0000000000000427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Firearm-related lead exposure could occur when firearms discharge lead ammunition particles. Prior studies were primarily among military or police participants, but this relation has not been examined in civilian populations. Thus, among noninstitutionalized United States (US) adult civilians, we examined the association of self-reported firearm noise exposure (proxy for firearm-related lead exposure) and firearm use with blood lead concentrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 5 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Using lead biomarkers and questionnaires related to firearm noise exposure (1999-2004, n = 9,606) and firearm use (2011-2012 and 2015-2016, n = 5,972), we calculated survey-weighted and covariate-adjusted percent differences in blood lead concentrations. We adjusted for gender, age, race/ethnicity, and education. Sensitivity analyses separately examined whether former military status, pre-1978 housing, or occupation confounded these associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-reported firearm noise exposure was associated with blood lead concentrations (percent difference 15%; 95% CI = 7%, 23%), but firearm use was not (percent difference 1%; 95% CI = -5%, 9%). However, blood lead concentrations were 9% (95% CI = -5%, 25%) and 21% (95% CI = -5%, 54%) higher among those who reported shooting 1,000-10,000 and 10,000+ rounds, respectively (<i>P</i> value for trend = 0.07), compared with those who reported shooting 0 rounds. Results were similar after separate adjustment for former military status, pre-1978 housing, and occupation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this representative sample of US civilians, individuals who used firearms more frequently (10,000+ rounds) had increased blood lead concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11713,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Epidemiology","volume":"9 6","pages":"e427"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12551738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Firearm-related lead exposure could occur when firearms discharge lead ammunition particles. Prior studies were primarily among military or police participants, but this relation has not been examined in civilian populations. Thus, among noninstitutionalized United States (US) adult civilians, we examined the association of self-reported firearm noise exposure (proxy for firearm-related lead exposure) and firearm use with blood lead concentrations.

Methods: We used 5 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Using lead biomarkers and questionnaires related to firearm noise exposure (1999-2004, n = 9,606) and firearm use (2011-2012 and 2015-2016, n = 5,972), we calculated survey-weighted and covariate-adjusted percent differences in blood lead concentrations. We adjusted for gender, age, race/ethnicity, and education. Sensitivity analyses separately examined whether former military status, pre-1978 housing, or occupation confounded these associations.

Results: Self-reported firearm noise exposure was associated with blood lead concentrations (percent difference 15%; 95% CI = 7%, 23%), but firearm use was not (percent difference 1%; 95% CI = -5%, 9%). However, blood lead concentrations were 9% (95% CI = -5%, 25%) and 21% (95% CI = -5%, 54%) higher among those who reported shooting 1,000-10,000 and 10,000+ rounds, respectively (P value for trend = 0.07), compared with those who reported shooting 0 rounds. Results were similar after separate adjustment for former military status, pre-1978 housing, and occupation.

Conclusion: In this representative sample of US civilians, individuals who used firearms more frequently (10,000+ rounds) had increased blood lead concentrations.

Abstract Image

在一个具有全国代表性的美国成年人队列中,自我报告的枪支使用与血铅浓度的横断面关联。
背景:当火器释放含铅弹药颗粒时,可能发生与火器有关的铅暴露。先前的研究主要是在军队或警察参与者中进行的,但这种关系尚未在平民人口中进行研究。因此,在非收容的美国成年平民中,我们研究了自我报告的枪支噪音暴露(枪支相关铅暴露的代表)和枪支使用与血铅浓度的关系。方法:采用5个周期的全国健康与营养调查。利用铅生物标志物和与枪支噪音暴露(1999-2004年,n = 9606)和枪支使用(2011-2012年和2015-2016年,n = 5972)相关的问卷调查,我们计算了调查加权和协变量调整后血铅浓度的百分比差异。我们根据性别、年龄、种族/民族和教育程度进行了调整。敏感性分析分别检查了前军人身份、1978年以前的住房或职业是否会混淆这些关联。结果:自我报告的枪支噪音暴露与血铅浓度相关(百分比差异15%;95% CI = 7%, 23%),但枪支使用与血铅浓度无关(百分比差异1%;95% CI = -5%, 9%)。然而,在报告射击1,000-10,000发和10,000发以上的人群中,血铅浓度分别比报告射击0发的人群高9% (95% CI = -5%, 25%)和21% (95% CI = -5%, 54%)(趋势P值= 0.07)。在对退役军人身份、1978年以前的住房和职业进行单独调整后,结果相似。结论:在这个具有代表性的美国平民样本中,使用枪支频率更高(10000发以上)的人血铅浓度升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Epidemiology
Environmental Epidemiology Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
71
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书