Best evidence summary on anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Xinyue Xiang , Yudi Yu , Xiaomei Fang , Tian Zheng , Wenbo Qiao
{"title":"Best evidence summary on anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism","authors":"Xinyue Xiang ,&nbsp;Yudi Yu ,&nbsp;Xiaomei Fang ,&nbsp;Tian Zheng ,&nbsp;Wenbo Qiao","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the best evidence for anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was an evidence summary study conducted in strict accordance with the reporting standards of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing. According to the evidence pyramid “6S” model, the search was performed from top to bottom. The following databases were searched: BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, Joanna Briggs Institute, Cochrane Library, Guidelines International Network, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, YiMaiTong Guidelines Network, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Sinomed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP. Professional association websites included those of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, British Society for Haematology, and the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The search period was from the inception of each database to October 2024. Literature types included clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, expert consensuses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 19 studies were included, comprising three clinical decisions, 10 guidelines, one expert consensus, four systematic reviews, and one RCT. Thirty-four pieces of evidence were synthesized across eight aspects: risk factor assessment, timing of anticoagulation, drug selection, treatment duration, management of recurrence, safety monitoring, health education, and follow-up care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study summarizes the best evidence for anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated VTE. When applying this evidence clinically, health care providers should thoroughly evaluate the feasibility and appropriateness of each recommendation to develop clinical decisions tailored to China's national conditions and health care resources.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>This study has been registered on the Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing (Registration No. ES20244015).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100789"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562525001374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the best evidence for anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Methods

This was an evidence summary study conducted in strict accordance with the reporting standards of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing. According to the evidence pyramid “6S” model, the search was performed from top to bottom. The following databases were searched: BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, Joanna Briggs Institute, Cochrane Library, Guidelines International Network, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, YiMaiTong Guidelines Network, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Sinomed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP. Professional association websites included those of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, British Society for Haematology, and the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The search period was from the inception of each database to October 2024. Literature types included clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, expert consensuses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Results

A total of 19 studies were included, comprising three clinical decisions, 10 guidelines, one expert consensus, four systematic reviews, and one RCT. Thirty-four pieces of evidence were synthesized across eight aspects: risk factor assessment, timing of anticoagulation, drug selection, treatment duration, management of recurrence, safety monitoring, health education, and follow-up care.

Conclusions

This study summarizes the best evidence for anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated VTE. When applying this evidence clinically, health care providers should thoroughly evaluate the feasibility and appropriateness of each recommendation to develop clinical decisions tailored to China's national conditions and health care resources.

Systematic review registration

This study has been registered on the Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing (Registration No. ES20244015).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

癌症相关性静脉血栓栓塞患者抗凝治疗的最佳证据总结。
目的:检索、评价和总结癌症相关性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)患者抗凝治疗的最佳证据。方法:本研究是一项严格按照复旦大学循证护理中心报告标准进行的证据总结研究。根据证据金字塔“6S”模型,从上到下进行搜索。检索的数据库包括:BMJ Best Practice、UpToDate、Joanna Briggs Institute、Cochrane Library、Guidelines International Network、National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence、Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network、Ontario注册护士协会、YiMaiTong Guidelines Network、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、中国医学信息网(CNKI)、万方、VIP。专业协会网站包括美国临床肿瘤学会、美国血液学会、英国血液学会、国际血栓与止血学会科学与标准化委员会。检索周期为每个数据库建立之初至2024年10月。文献类型包括临床实践指南、临床决策、专家共识、系统评价和随机对照试验(rct)。结果:共纳入19项研究,包括3项临床决定、10项指南、1项专家共识、4项系统评价和1项随机对照试验。从危险因素评估、抗凝时机、药物选择、治疗时间、复发管理、安全监测、健康教育和随访护理等8个方面综合34条证据。结论:本研究总结了癌症相关性静脉血栓栓塞患者抗凝治疗的最佳证据。在临床应用这些证据时,卫生保健提供者应全面评估每项建议的可行性和适当性,以制定适合中国国情和卫生保健资源的临床决策。系统评价注册:本研究已在复旦大学循证护理研究中心注册(注册号:ES20244015)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书