Raw milk from individual teats with an optimal teat-end score has lower spore levels compared with teats with a suboptimal teat-end score

IF 2.2
JDS communications Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI:10.3168/jdsc.2025-0802
Aljoša Trmčić, Rachel L. Evanowski, Sriya Sunil, Martin Wiedmann, Nicole H. Martin
{"title":"Raw milk from individual teats with an optimal teat-end score has lower spore levels compared with teats with a suboptimal teat-end score","authors":"Aljoša Trmčić,&nbsp;Rachel L. Evanowski,&nbsp;Sriya Sunil,&nbsp;Martin Wiedmann,&nbsp;Nicole H. Martin","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2025-0802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Udder health in dairy cows is routinely monitored (for example, through determination of SCC) to help identify and control mastitis and other infectious diseases. Another parameter used to both assess udder health and milking machine performance is the teat-end condition, typically assessed at the herd level using a 4-point scoring system. Recently, the teat-end score has been suggested as a factor associated with the levels of bacterial spores in raw milk. Spores of cold-tolerant sporeforming bacteria present in raw milk can survive pasteurization and contribute to the spoilage of fluid milk. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine whether the condition of individual teat-ends (specifically, optimal versus suboptimal teat-end scores) affects the spore levels in raw milk obtained from these teats. A total of 102 raw milk samples were collected from 102 individual teats from cows on a single dairy farm, and tested for mesophilic spores, with 51 samples each from teats scored as either 1 (optimal) or 4 (suboptimal). A significantly lower mesophilic spore count was found in the raw milk samples collected from teats with a teat-end score of 1 compared with samples collected from teats with score of 4. The observed difference in mesophilic spore counts suggests that maintaining optimal teat-end condition through good udder health and milking machine management may help reduce spore levels in raw milk. Although the observed difference in mesophilic spore counts is expected to result in minimal improvement of fluid milk shelf-life and other quality parameters, interventions targeting teat-end status or farm management practices that aim to improve the same can still be an important incremental contributor to the overall improvement of these parameters as part of a comprehensive, multipronged approach to raw milk quality management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 6","pages":"Pages 733-737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910225001425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Udder health in dairy cows is routinely monitored (for example, through determination of SCC) to help identify and control mastitis and other infectious diseases. Another parameter used to both assess udder health and milking machine performance is the teat-end condition, typically assessed at the herd level using a 4-point scoring system. Recently, the teat-end score has been suggested as a factor associated with the levels of bacterial spores in raw milk. Spores of cold-tolerant sporeforming bacteria present in raw milk can survive pasteurization and contribute to the spoilage of fluid milk. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine whether the condition of individual teat-ends (specifically, optimal versus suboptimal teat-end scores) affects the spore levels in raw milk obtained from these teats. A total of 102 raw milk samples were collected from 102 individual teats from cows on a single dairy farm, and tested for mesophilic spores, with 51 samples each from teats scored as either 1 (optimal) or 4 (suboptimal). A significantly lower mesophilic spore count was found in the raw milk samples collected from teats with a teat-end score of 1 compared with samples collected from teats with score of 4. The observed difference in mesophilic spore counts suggests that maintaining optimal teat-end condition through good udder health and milking machine management may help reduce spore levels in raw milk. Although the observed difference in mesophilic spore counts is expected to result in minimal improvement of fluid milk shelf-life and other quality parameters, interventions targeting teat-end status or farm management practices that aim to improve the same can still be an important incremental contributor to the overall improvement of these parameters as part of a comprehensive, multipronged approach to raw milk quality management.
与次优乳末评分的奶牛相比,具有最佳乳末评分的个体奶牛的生乳具有较低的孢子水平
对奶牛的乳房健康进行常规监测(例如,通过测定SCC),以帮助识别和控制乳腺炎和其他传染病。另一个用于评估奶牛乳腺健康和挤奶机性能的参数是末端状况,通常在牛群水平上使用4分评分系统进行评估。最近,被认为是与生牛奶中细菌孢子水平相关的一个因素。原料奶中存在的耐冷孢子形成细菌的孢子可以在巴氏灭菌中存活,并有助于液体奶的变质。因此,本研究的目的是确定单个乳头末端的条件(特别是最佳与次优乳头末端得分)是否会影响从这些乳头中获得的原料奶中的孢子水平。从一个奶牛场的102头奶牛身上收集了102份原料奶样本,并对中温性孢子进行了检测,其中51份样本分别被评为1(最佳)或4(次优)。与从得分为4的乳头中收集的样品相比,从乳头末端得分为1的乳头中收集的原料奶样品中发现了显着较低的中温性孢子计数。观察到的中温菌孢子数量的差异表明,通过良好的乳房健康和挤奶机管理来保持最佳的末端状态可能有助于降低原料奶中的孢子水平。虽然观察到的中温菌孢子数的差异预计会导致液体奶保质期和其他质量参数的最小改善,但针对末端状态的干预措施或旨在改善相同质量的农场管理实践,仍然可以作为原料奶质量管理综合、多管齐下方法的一部分,对这些参数的总体改善做出重要的增量贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书