{"title":"Variations in environmental DNA deteAQBOT 103954ction of aquatic plants across water body types: A case study of the Tokachi River","authors":"Chigaya Enju , Souta Nakajima , Kenji Tsuri , Ryusuke Shinohara , Kazuki Kanno , Keiko Muraoka , Koji Katagiri","doi":"10.1016/j.aquabot.2025.103954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The conservation of aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems is essential for supporting aquatic animal communities. However, conducting field surveys of aquatic plants in riverine environments remains challenging, posing as a barrier to understanding their habitats. In this study, vegetation surveys and environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding were conducted in the main channel, connected ponds, and isolated ponds of the Tokachi River—one of the major rivers in Japan. The aim of this study was to (i) compare species detection between eDNA metabarcoding and field survey results using multiple markers, (ii) determine whether eDNA detection of aquatic plants varies across water body types, and (iii) identify whether detection differences are associated with taxonomic groups or life forms of aquatic plants. A total of 34 species were recorded through field surveys, and 29 species were detected through eDNA analysis. At the species level, 24 species (approximately 80 %) could only be detected using one marker. Isolated ponds yielded the highest number of species in field and eDNA surveys. The families Potamogetonaceae and Poaceae were most frequently detected by eDNA (five species each); notably, both families were also well represented in vegetation surveys across many sites. Overall, submerged plants were detected more frequently by eDNA than emergent plants across all water body type. Additionally, eDNA was able to detect rare species. These findings suggest that eDNA surveys are a valuable tool for detecting submerged and rare aquatic plant species in large river systems, particularly where field-based identification is limited.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8273,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Botany","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 103954"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304377025000890","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The conservation of aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems is essential for supporting aquatic animal communities. However, conducting field surveys of aquatic plants in riverine environments remains challenging, posing as a barrier to understanding their habitats. In this study, vegetation surveys and environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding were conducted in the main channel, connected ponds, and isolated ponds of the Tokachi River—one of the major rivers in Japan. The aim of this study was to (i) compare species detection between eDNA metabarcoding and field survey results using multiple markers, (ii) determine whether eDNA detection of aquatic plants varies across water body types, and (iii) identify whether detection differences are associated with taxonomic groups or life forms of aquatic plants. A total of 34 species were recorded through field surveys, and 29 species were detected through eDNA analysis. At the species level, 24 species (approximately 80 %) could only be detected using one marker. Isolated ponds yielded the highest number of species in field and eDNA surveys. The families Potamogetonaceae and Poaceae were most frequently detected by eDNA (five species each); notably, both families were also well represented in vegetation surveys across many sites. Overall, submerged plants were detected more frequently by eDNA than emergent plants across all water body type. Additionally, eDNA was able to detect rare species. These findings suggest that eDNA surveys are a valuable tool for detecting submerged and rare aquatic plant species in large river systems, particularly where field-based identification is limited.
期刊介绍:
Aquatic Botany offers a platform for papers relevant to a broad international readership on fundamental and applied aspects of marine and freshwater macroscopic plants in a context of ecology or environmental biology. This includes molecular, biochemical and physiological aspects of macroscopic aquatic plants as well as the classification, structure, function, dynamics and ecological interactions in plant-dominated aquatic communities and ecosystems. It is an outlet for papers dealing with research on the consequences of disturbance and stressors (e.g. environmental fluctuations and climate change, pollution, grazing and pathogens), use and management of aquatic plants (plant production and decomposition, commercial harvest, plant control) and the conservation of aquatic plant communities (breeding, transplantation and restoration). Specialized publications on certain rare taxa or papers on aquatic macroscopic plants from under-represented regions in the world can also find their place, subject to editor evaluation. Studies on fungi or microalgae will remain outside the scope of Aquatic Botany.