Sex differences in giant panda paw preferences during bamboo feeding.

IF 1.9 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Learning & Behavior Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-24 DOI:10.3758/s13420-025-00693-0
Rebecca J Snyder, Lisa P Barrett, Rong Hou, Jingchao Lan, Benjamin D Charlton
{"title":"Sex differences in giant panda paw preferences during bamboo feeding.","authors":"Rebecca J Snyder, Lisa P Barrett, Rong Hou, Jingchao Lan, Benjamin D Charlton","doi":"10.3758/s13420-025-00693-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined giant panda paw use while feeding on bamboo to determine if this species exhibits manual lateralization. Video recordings of 21 captive giant pandas (15 females and six males) were used to measure two unimanual behaviors: 1) duration of grasping and manipulating bamboo culm during feeding bouts and 2) number of reaches. We did not find paw preferences at the population level but found significant sex differences in paw use. Male giant pandas used their right paw significantly more than their left paw while manipulating bamboo culm, whereas females used their left paw more for both manipulating and reaching for bamboo. Our results differ from previous studies, in which males of most placental quadrupeds have been found to favor the left forelimb more so than females. This preliminary study also suggests that task differences influence the degree of manual lateralization in the giant panda, and challenges the hypothesis that a lack of a corpus callosum leads to sex differences in marsupial forelimb biases. Considering the giant panda's distinctive behavioral ecology, morphology, and evolutionary history, this species provides a valuable model for investigating manual lateralization. We recommend further research on giant pandas, to test our preliminary findings, as well as comparative studies across other ursid species, which exhibit substantial variation in habitat and feeding ecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":49914,"journal":{"name":"Learning & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"153-162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-025-00693-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined giant panda paw use while feeding on bamboo to determine if this species exhibits manual lateralization. Video recordings of 21 captive giant pandas (15 females and six males) were used to measure two unimanual behaviors: 1) duration of grasping and manipulating bamboo culm during feeding bouts and 2) number of reaches. We did not find paw preferences at the population level but found significant sex differences in paw use. Male giant pandas used their right paw significantly more than their left paw while manipulating bamboo culm, whereas females used their left paw more for both manipulating and reaching for bamboo. Our results differ from previous studies, in which males of most placental quadrupeds have been found to favor the left forelimb more so than females. This preliminary study also suggests that task differences influence the degree of manual lateralization in the giant panda, and challenges the hypothesis that a lack of a corpus callosum leads to sex differences in marsupial forelimb biases. Considering the giant panda's distinctive behavioral ecology, morphology, and evolutionary history, this species provides a valuable model for investigating manual lateralization. We recommend further research on giant pandas, to test our preliminary findings, as well as comparative studies across other ursid species, which exhibit substantial variation in habitat and feeding ecology.

大熊猫取食竹子时爪子偏好的性别差异。
我们研究了大熊猫在吃竹子时的爪子使用情况,以确定该物种是否表现出手动偏侧化。研究了21只圈养大熊猫(雌性15只,雄性6只)在进食过程中抓握和操纵竹竿的时间和伸手次数。我们没有在种群水平上发现对爪子的偏好,但在爪子的使用上发现了显著的性别差异。雄性大熊猫在操纵竹竿时明显更多地使用右爪而不是左爪,而雌性大熊猫则更多地使用左爪来操纵和抓取竹子。我们的结果与之前的研究不同,在之前的研究中,大多数胎盘四足动物的雄性比雌性更喜欢左前肢。这项初步研究还表明,任务差异影响了大熊猫手侧化的程度,并挑战了胼胝体缺失导致有袋动物前肢偏向性性别差异的假设。考虑到大熊猫独特的行为生态、形态和进化史,该物种为研究人工偏侧化提供了一个有价值的模型。我们建议对大熊猫进行进一步的研究,以验证我们的初步发现,并对其他熊科动物进行比较研究,这些物种在栖息地和摄食生态方面表现出巨大的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning & Behavior
Learning & Behavior 医学-动物学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Learning & Behavior publishes experimental and theoretical contributions and critical reviews concerning fundamental processes of learning and behavior in nonhuman and human animals. Topics covered include sensation, perception, conditioning, learning, attention, memory, motivation, emotion, development, social behavior, and comparative investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书