Mario Palone, Petra J Koch, Julia De Geer, Gianmarco Guidetti, Francesca Cremonini, Giorgio A Spedicato, Luca Brucculeri, Alessandro Verducci, Luca Lombardo
{"title":"Accuracy of a new, slim, and rigid CAD-CAM transfer tray: An in vivo study.","authors":"Mario Palone, Petra J Koch, Julia De Geer, Gianmarco Guidetti, Francesca Cremonini, Giorgio A Spedicato, Luca Brucculeri, Alessandro Verducci, Luca Lombardo","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo transfer accuracy of a new slim and rigid computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) transfer tray.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen patients (9 males and 8 females; average age, 14.3 years) with permanent dentition undergoing orthodontic treatment were enrolled. Digital models were obtained, and brackets and molar tubes were virtually positioned. The CAD-CAM transfer tray was designed and 3-dimensionally printed, and the bonding procedure was performed. Transfer accuracy was assessed by measuring linear and angular deviations between planned and in vivo bonded bracket positions by superimposition using a local best-fit alignment performed by a semiautomatic algorithm in the analysis software Geomagic Control (3D System Inc, Rock Hill, NC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 408 teeth (208 maxillary and 200 mandibular) were superimposed. All mean linear deviations were <0.5 mm, although some exceeded the 0.25-mm cutoff (4.4% of mesiodistal measurements, 4.2% of vertical, and 0.2% of buccolingual). Angular discrepancies were greater, especially when using a 1° cutoff (25.7% for torque, 33.8% for rotation, and 18.6% for tip). However, these discrepancies decreased significantly when the cutoff was raised to 2° (in 5.6%, 9.3% and 3.4% respectively). Considering all brackets, no directional bias was detected, except in buccolingual measurements (35% vestibular and 65% lingual). Transfer accuracy was influenced by the variables tooth type, tooth position, and arch, which had various impacts across specific measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new CAD-CAM transfer tray demonstrated good overall transfer accuracy and some clinical advantages, although refinement of the design is required to enhance its performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.08.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo transfer accuracy of a new slim and rigid computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) transfer tray.
Methods: Seventeen patients (9 males and 8 females; average age, 14.3 years) with permanent dentition undergoing orthodontic treatment were enrolled. Digital models were obtained, and brackets and molar tubes were virtually positioned. The CAD-CAM transfer tray was designed and 3-dimensionally printed, and the bonding procedure was performed. Transfer accuracy was assessed by measuring linear and angular deviations between planned and in vivo bonded bracket positions by superimposition using a local best-fit alignment performed by a semiautomatic algorithm in the analysis software Geomagic Control (3D System Inc, Rock Hill, NC).
Results: A total of 408 teeth (208 maxillary and 200 mandibular) were superimposed. All mean linear deviations were <0.5 mm, although some exceeded the 0.25-mm cutoff (4.4% of mesiodistal measurements, 4.2% of vertical, and 0.2% of buccolingual). Angular discrepancies were greater, especially when using a 1° cutoff (25.7% for torque, 33.8% for rotation, and 18.6% for tip). However, these discrepancies decreased significantly when the cutoff was raised to 2° (in 5.6%, 9.3% and 3.4% respectively). Considering all brackets, no directional bias was detected, except in buccolingual measurements (35% vestibular and 65% lingual). Transfer accuracy was influenced by the variables tooth type, tooth position, and arch, which had various impacts across specific measurements.
Conclusions: The new CAD-CAM transfer tray demonstrated good overall transfer accuracy and some clinical advantages, although refinement of the design is required to enhance its performance.
简介:本研究的目的是评估一种新型细长刚性计算机辅助设计和制造(CAD-CAM)转移托盘的体内转移精度。方法:选取17例接受正畸治疗的恒牙列患者,男9例,女8例,平均年龄14.3岁。获得数字模型,并对托槽和磨牙管进行虚拟定位。设计并三维打印了CAD-CAM传递托盘,并进行了粘接。通过在分析软件Geomagic Control (3D System Inc ., Rock Hill, NC)中使用半自动算法进行局部最佳拟合校准,通过测量计划和体内粘合支架位置之间的线性和角度偏差来评估传递精度。结果:共种植牙408颗(上颌208颗,下颌骨200颗)。结论:新的CAD-CAM转移托盘显示出良好的整体转移精度和一些临床优势,尽管需要改进设计以提高其性能。
期刊介绍:
Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.