{"title":"Factors influencing the availability of anesthesiologists: a scoping review.","authors":"Zahra Keyvanlo, Fatemeh Kokabisaghi, Mahdi Yousefi, Alireza Sedaghat, Hossein Ebrahimipour","doi":"10.1186/s12960-025-01021-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Access to safe surgery and anesthesia remains a pressing global challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study examines the factors influencing the worldwide availability of anesthesiologists, a critical determinant of effective surgical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a scoping review based on the five-stage Arksey and O'Malley framework. Relevant studies were identified through systematic searches of scientific and grey literature databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, as well as anesthesia-specific websites and journals. The review encompassed publications from May 2015 to November 2023. A multidisciplinary team conducted data extraction and thematic coding using the STEEP(Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political) model, resolving discrepancies through consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 925 screened articles, 63 met the inclusion criteria. The analysis identified 68 distinct factors organized into five STEEP areas. The most frequently cited issues in each category are as follows: (1) Political Factors: These emerged as the most frequently cited, with national and international institutional support for workforce planning identified as a cornerstone issue. (2) Social Factors: Key challenges included limited opportunities for professional development and skills evaluation, compounded by poor work-life balance. (3) Economic Factors: Financial disincentives and excessive workloads stood out as the primary barriers to anesthesiologist availability. (4) Technological Factors: Restricted access to medical training opportunities posed a significant obstacle. (5) Environmental Factors: Though less prominent, these were recognized for their potential to enhance geographical equity and resource access in anesthesia education and service delivery. High-income countries focused on optimizing performance, improving workplace quality, and strengthening retention strategies, while LMICs contended with structural challenges such as resource shortages, workforce migration, and inadequate infrastructure. Across all countries, social issues such as job burnout and work-life imbalance, alongside economic challenges like financial incentives and workload were recurring themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings illuminate the complex, multifaceted nature of factors affecting anesthesiologist availability. They underscore the necessity for comprehensive strategies that promote collaboration at local, national, and global levels. Addressing the political, economic, social, technological, and environmental dimensions is imperative to ensure safe and effective anesthesia care worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":39823,"journal":{"name":"Human Resources for Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12553181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resources for Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-025-01021-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Access to safe surgery and anesthesia remains a pressing global challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study examines the factors influencing the worldwide availability of anesthesiologists, a critical determinant of effective surgical care.
Methods: We performed a scoping review based on the five-stage Arksey and O'Malley framework. Relevant studies were identified through systematic searches of scientific and grey literature databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, as well as anesthesia-specific websites and journals. The review encompassed publications from May 2015 to November 2023. A multidisciplinary team conducted data extraction and thematic coding using the STEEP(Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political) model, resolving discrepancies through consensus.
Results: Of the 925 screened articles, 63 met the inclusion criteria. The analysis identified 68 distinct factors organized into five STEEP areas. The most frequently cited issues in each category are as follows: (1) Political Factors: These emerged as the most frequently cited, with national and international institutional support for workforce planning identified as a cornerstone issue. (2) Social Factors: Key challenges included limited opportunities for professional development and skills evaluation, compounded by poor work-life balance. (3) Economic Factors: Financial disincentives and excessive workloads stood out as the primary barriers to anesthesiologist availability. (4) Technological Factors: Restricted access to medical training opportunities posed a significant obstacle. (5) Environmental Factors: Though less prominent, these were recognized for their potential to enhance geographical equity and resource access in anesthesia education and service delivery. High-income countries focused on optimizing performance, improving workplace quality, and strengthening retention strategies, while LMICs contended with structural challenges such as resource shortages, workforce migration, and inadequate infrastructure. Across all countries, social issues such as job burnout and work-life imbalance, alongside economic challenges like financial incentives and workload were recurring themes.
Conclusions: These findings illuminate the complex, multifaceted nature of factors affecting anesthesiologist availability. They underscore the necessity for comprehensive strategies that promote collaboration at local, national, and global levels. Addressing the political, economic, social, technological, and environmental dimensions is imperative to ensure safe and effective anesthesia care worldwide.
获得安全手术和麻醉仍然是一项紧迫的全球挑战,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。本研究探讨了影响全球麻醉师可用性的因素,这是有效外科护理的关键决定因素。方法:我们根据Arksey和O'Malley的五阶段框架进行了范围审查。通过系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、谷歌Scholar等科学文献和灰色文献数据库,以及麻醉相关网站和期刊,确定相关研究。该审查包括2015年5月至2023年11月的出版物。一个多学科团队使用陡(社会、技术、经济、环境、政治)模型进行数据提取和专题编码,通过共识解决差异。结果:925篇筛选文章中,63篇符合纳入标准。分析确定了68个不同的因素,分为五个陡峭区域。(1)政治因素:这些是最常被提及的问题,国家和国际机构对劳动力规划的支持被确定为一个基石问题。(2)社会因素:主要挑战包括专业发展和技能评估机会有限,工作与生活平衡不佳。(3)经济因素:经济激励和过度的工作量是麻醉师可用性的主要障碍。(4)技术因素:获得医疗培训机会的机会有限是一个重大障碍。(5)环境因素:虽然不太突出,但这些因素在麻醉教育和服务提供中具有增强地域公平和资源获取的潜力。高收入国家侧重于优化绩效、提高工作场所质量和加强留住战略,而中低收入国家则面临资源短缺、劳动力迁移和基础设施不足等结构性挑战。在所有国家,诸如工作倦怠和工作与生活不平衡等社会问题,以及诸如财务激励和工作量等经济挑战,都是反复出现的主题。结论:这些发现阐明了影响麻醉师可用性的因素的复杂性和多面性。它们强调了制定促进地方、国家和全球各级合作的综合战略的必要性。解决政治、经济、社会、技术和环境方面的问题是确保全球麻醉护理安全有效的必要条件。
期刊介绍:
Human Resources for Health is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal covering all aspects of planning, producing and managing the health workforce - all those who provide health services worldwide. Human Resources for Health aims to disseminate research on health workforce policy, the health labour market, health workforce practice, development of knowledge tools and implementation mechanisms nationally and internationally; as well as specific features of the health workforce, such as the impact of management of health workers" performance and its link with health outcomes. The journal encourages debate on health sector reforms and their link with human resources issues, a hitherto-neglected area.