The BWC at 50: Exploring OSINT Opportunities and Challenges in the BWC Ecosystem.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lily Boland, Jackson du Pont, Yong-Bee Lim
{"title":"The BWC at 50: Exploring OSINT Opportunities and Challenges in the BWC Ecosystem.","authors":"Lily Boland, Jackson du Pont, Yong-Bee Lim","doi":"10.1177/23265094251387084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) was the first international disarmament treaty to eliminate an entire class of weapons. As it celebrates its semicentennial, the BWC is recognized for enshrining norms against the misuse of biology, even during the height of the Cold War: norms that encapsulated humanity's repugnance of bioweapons. Nevertheless, the BWC faces unique challenges compared to other disarmament treaties, such as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty or the Chemical Weapons Convention. These include debates around verification, sociopolitical friction across the states parties, and even accusations that states parties have maintained biological weapons programs despite their treaty obligations. Many experts note difficulties in strengthening the BWC, particularly in a multipolar, competitive geopolitical environment. One potential pathway to support the BWC is using open-source information collection, analysis, and methods applied toward a \"layered approach to verification [which] could help build confidence in compliance and potentially verify the BWC.\" Colloquially known as open-source intelligence (OSINT), this intelligence-gathering discipline uses publicly available information and signals sources for fact-checking, investigating suspicious occurrences, and examining items of interest. This approach has shown promise in other weapons of mass destruction applications, from tracking and tracing Syrian and Russian use of chemical weapons to uncovering nuclear weapons arsenals. Further, as stakeholders generate and retain more biological data from multisource samples, now is an opportune time to examine how open-source information and methods might mitigate bioweapons risks. This is particularly germane to the present, as people explore OSINT information and methods as 1 tool to both help strengthen the BWC architecture and support transparency and norm-setting efforts outside of the treaty.</p>","PeriodicalId":12955,"journal":{"name":"Health Security","volume":"23 5","pages":"314-325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Security","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23265094251387084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) was the first international disarmament treaty to eliminate an entire class of weapons. As it celebrates its semicentennial, the BWC is recognized for enshrining norms against the misuse of biology, even during the height of the Cold War: norms that encapsulated humanity's repugnance of bioweapons. Nevertheless, the BWC faces unique challenges compared to other disarmament treaties, such as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty or the Chemical Weapons Convention. These include debates around verification, sociopolitical friction across the states parties, and even accusations that states parties have maintained biological weapons programs despite their treaty obligations. Many experts note difficulties in strengthening the BWC, particularly in a multipolar, competitive geopolitical environment. One potential pathway to support the BWC is using open-source information collection, analysis, and methods applied toward a "layered approach to verification [which] could help build confidence in compliance and potentially verify the BWC." Colloquially known as open-source intelligence (OSINT), this intelligence-gathering discipline uses publicly available information and signals sources for fact-checking, investigating suspicious occurrences, and examining items of interest. This approach has shown promise in other weapons of mass destruction applications, from tracking and tracing Syrian and Russian use of chemical weapons to uncovering nuclear weapons arsenals. Further, as stakeholders generate and retain more biological data from multisource samples, now is an opportune time to examine how open-source information and methods might mitigate bioweapons risks. This is particularly germane to the present, as people explore OSINT information and methods as 1 tool to both help strengthen the BWC architecture and support transparency and norm-setting efforts outside of the treaty.

《禁止生物武器公约》成立50周年:探讨《禁止生物武器公约》生态系统中的机遇和挑战。
《禁止生物武器公约》(BWC)是第一个消除一整类武器的国际裁军条约。在庆祝其成立50周年之际,《禁止生物武器公约》被公认为是禁止滥用生物武器的准则,即使在冷战最激烈的时期也是如此:这些准则概括了人类对生物武器的反感。然而,与《不扩散核武器条约》或《禁止化学武器公约》等其他裁军条约相比,《禁止生物武器公约》面临着独特的挑战。其中包括围绕核查的辩论、各缔约国之间的社会政治摩擦,甚至有人指责各缔约国不顾条约义务维持生物武器计划。许多专家指出,加强《禁止生物武器公约》存在困难,特别是在多极、竞争激烈的地缘政治环境中。支持《禁止生物武器公约》的一个潜在途径是使用开源信息收集、分析和方法,用于“分层验证方法,这有助于建立对遵守情况的信心,并可能验证《禁止生物武器公约》。”通常称为开源情报(OSINT),这种情报收集规程使用公开可用的信息和信号源进行事实核查、调查可疑事件和检查感兴趣的项目。从追踪和追踪叙利亚和俄罗斯使用化学武器,到发现核武库,这种方法在其他大规模杀伤性武器应用中显示出了希望。此外,随着利益相关者从多来源样本中产生和保留更多的生物数据,现在是研究开源信息和方法如何减轻生物武器风险的时机。这一点与当前形势尤其密切相关,因为人们正在探索OSINT的信息和方法,将其作为一种工具,既有助于加强《生物武器公约》架构,又支持条约之外的透明度和规范制定工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Security
Health Security PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Health Security is a peer-reviewed journal providing research and essential guidance for the protection of people’s health before and after epidemics or disasters and for ensuring that communities are resilient to major challenges. The Journal explores the issues posed by disease outbreaks and epidemics; natural disasters; biological, chemical, and nuclear accidents or deliberate threats; foodborne outbreaks; and other health emergencies. It offers important insight into how to develop the systems needed to meet these challenges. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Health Security covers research, innovations, methods, challenges, and ethical and legal dilemmas facing scientific, military, and health organizations. The Journal is a key resource for practitioners in these fields, policymakers, scientific experts, and government officials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书