Epithelial Impermeability to Water: A Second Look.

IF 2.5 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY
Lydia G Gibson, Elena K DeFilippo, Austin Mahajan, Michael A Model
{"title":"Epithelial Impermeability to Water: A Second Look.","authors":"Lydia G Gibson, Elena K DeFilippo, Austin Mahajan, Michael A Model","doi":"10.33594/000000820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Impermeability of the ascending limb of the Henle loop for water is traditionally regarded as essential for countercurrent multiplication in the kidney. Similar claims have been made about permeability properties of the collecting duct and some other epithelia. It is not clear, however, how a structure based on phospholipid bilayers can be water-impermeant if phospholipid bilayers themselves have measurable permeability. The presence of two membranes separated by the cytoplasm may only account for a several-fold reduction in permeability compared to a single bilayer. By analyzing published data, we conclude that these tubules do have a finite water permeability, especially the collecting duct. Although the results on isolated ascending limbs vary among authors, osmotic shock experiments clearly indicate that both the collecting duct and the ascending Henle loop are sufficiently water-permeable to observe volume regulation effects. We conclude that these epithelia by themselves do not display unusual resistance to water flow; it can be estimated that 20-50% of the fluid entering the tubules can be reabsorbed into a strongly hypertonic medulla. It is possible, however, that unstirred layers in the intact kidney may contribute to the apparent low permeability of the tubules.</p>","PeriodicalId":9845,"journal":{"name":"Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry","volume":"59 5","pages":"730-735"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33594/000000820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Impermeability of the ascending limb of the Henle loop for water is traditionally regarded as essential for countercurrent multiplication in the kidney. Similar claims have been made about permeability properties of the collecting duct and some other epithelia. It is not clear, however, how a structure based on phospholipid bilayers can be water-impermeant if phospholipid bilayers themselves have measurable permeability. The presence of two membranes separated by the cytoplasm may only account for a several-fold reduction in permeability compared to a single bilayer. By analyzing published data, we conclude that these tubules do have a finite water permeability, especially the collecting duct. Although the results on isolated ascending limbs vary among authors, osmotic shock experiments clearly indicate that both the collecting duct and the ascending Henle loop are sufficiently water-permeable to observe volume regulation effects. We conclude that these epithelia by themselves do not display unusual resistance to water flow; it can be estimated that 20-50% of the fluid entering the tubules can be reabsorbed into a strongly hypertonic medulla. It is possible, however, that unstirred layers in the intact kidney may contribute to the apparent low permeability of the tubules.

上皮细胞对水的不渗透性:再看。
传统上认为,Henle环上升肢对水的不渗透性是肾脏逆流增殖的必要条件。关于集管和其他上皮的通透性也有类似的说法。然而,目前尚不清楚的是,如果磷脂双层本身具有可测量的渗透性,那么基于磷脂双层的结构是如何不含水的。由细胞质分离的两层膜的存在可能只解释了与单一双层膜相比通透性降低的几倍。通过分析已发表的数据,我们得出结论,这些小管确实具有有限的透水性,特别是集水管。虽然不同作者在离体上升肢上的实验结果不同,但渗透冲击实验清楚地表明,集水管和上升亨勒回路都具有足够的透水性,可以观察到体积调节作用。我们得出的结论是,这些上皮本身没有表现出对水流的异常阻力;据估计,进入小管的20-50%的液体可被重吸收到强高渗的髓质中。然而,完整肾脏中未搅拌的层可能导致小管明显的低通透性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry is a multidisciplinary scientific forum dedicated to advancing the frontiers of basic cellular research. It addresses scientists from both the physiological and biochemical disciplines as well as related fields such as genetics, molecular biology, pathophysiology, pathobiochemistry and cellular toxicology & pharmacology. Original papers and reviews on the mechanisms of intracellular transmission, cellular metabolism, cell growth, differentiation and death, ion channels and carriers, and the maintenance, regulation and disturbances of cell volume are presented. Appearing monthly under peer review, Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry takes an active role in the concerted international effort to unravel the mechanisms of cellular function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书