European Without Euros: How Geopolitical Histories Shape the Symbolic Boundaries of Europe

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
S Obradović, Reşit Kışlıoğlu, Nihan Albayrak, Mihaela Boza, Amena Amer, Murray Kennedy
{"title":"European Without Euros: How Geopolitical Histories Shape the Symbolic Boundaries of Europe","authors":"S Obradović,&nbsp;Reşit Kışlıoğlu,&nbsp;Nihan Albayrak,&nbsp;Mihaela Boza,&nbsp;Amena Amer,&nbsp;Murray Kennedy","doi":"10.1111/josi.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines how geopolitical, geoeconomic, and geocultural dynamics shape the symbolic boundaries of Europe and the psychological and political consequences of those boundaries. We extend traditional models of social identification by arguing that claims to group representativeness - and the recognition of such claims - are deeply informed by geopolitical contexts often neglected in mainstream psychological theory. Drawing on data from three studies conducted in Romania, Serbia, and Türkiye, we explore how perceptions of Europe's boundaries are socially constructed and experienced in non-Western European contexts. Study 1 investigates how geopolitical positioning informs constructions of a superordinate European identity, revealing a dominant framing of Europe as a “Western” project. Study 2 shows how this framing influences national self- and other-stereotyping, demonstrating an internalization of low status among non-Western countries in Europe. Study 3 experimentally evidences how positive recognition can create more positive geopolitical attitudes toward various European supranational organizations. Together, these studies show that geopolitical inclusion and exclusion have meaningful psychological effects. We argue for a more explicit integration of geopolitical histories and conditions into psychological research on superordinate identity. In doing so, we contribute to the emerging field of geopolitical psychology and highlight the mutually reinforcing relationship between geopolitical positioning and psychological recognition in defining the boundaries of Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.70033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines how geopolitical, geoeconomic, and geocultural dynamics shape the symbolic boundaries of Europe and the psychological and political consequences of those boundaries. We extend traditional models of social identification by arguing that claims to group representativeness - and the recognition of such claims - are deeply informed by geopolitical contexts often neglected in mainstream psychological theory. Drawing on data from three studies conducted in Romania, Serbia, and Türkiye, we explore how perceptions of Europe's boundaries are socially constructed and experienced in non-Western European contexts. Study 1 investigates how geopolitical positioning informs constructions of a superordinate European identity, revealing a dominant framing of Europe as a “Western” project. Study 2 shows how this framing influences national self- and other-stereotyping, demonstrating an internalization of low status among non-Western countries in Europe. Study 3 experimentally evidences how positive recognition can create more positive geopolitical attitudes toward various European supranational organizations. Together, these studies show that geopolitical inclusion and exclusion have meaningful psychological effects. We argue for a more explicit integration of geopolitical histories and conditions into psychological research on superordinate identity. In doing so, we contribute to the emerging field of geopolitical psychology and highlight the mutually reinforcing relationship between geopolitical positioning and psychological recognition in defining the boundaries of Europe.

没有欧元的欧洲:地缘政治历史如何塑造欧洲的象征性边界
本文考察了地缘政治、地缘经济和地缘文化动态如何塑造欧洲的象征性边界以及这些边界的心理和政治后果。我们扩展了传统的社会认同模型,认为对群体代表性的主张——以及对这种主张的认可——深受主流心理学理论中经常被忽视的地缘政治背景的影响。根据在罗马尼亚、塞尔维亚和罗马尼亚进行的三项研究的数据,我们探讨了在非西欧背景下,对欧洲边界的认知是如何被社会建构和体验的。研究1调查了地缘政治定位如何影响优越欧洲身份的构建,揭示了欧洲作为“西方”项目的主导框架。研究2表明,这种框架如何影响国家对自我和他人的刻板印象,表明欧洲非西方国家对低地位的内化。研究3通过实验证明,积极的认可如何能使人们对各种欧洲超国家组织产生更积极的地缘政治态度。综上所述,这些研究表明地缘政治包容和排斥具有重要的心理影响。我们主张将地缘政治历史和条件更明确地整合到上级身份的心理学研究中。在此过程中,我们为新兴的地缘政治心理学领域做出了贡献,并强调了地缘政治定位和心理认知之间在定义欧洲边界方面相互加强的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书